"Nick" wrote in message
oups.com...
John J. wrote (to Jason Repa):
Well, since I don't see too many folks coming to your defence
I can conclude that it's you who needs to understand.

What I write in this post should *not* be construed
as any defence of Jason Repa in this thread.

Aw, come on.....don't you want to be my friend? Please Nick.....be my
friend. Pretty please?



I'm done with you. You obviously have something to prove. I don't.
Maybe you hate Americans?

As I can recall, Jason Repa has been in conflicts with
some other Canadian writer(s) in rec.games.chess.*

You have excellent recall Mr. Bourbaki! I am an equal opportunity
"conflicter". No nation, race, creed, or religion, is immune from being in
conflict with me.



I'm sure they could use more guys with attitudes like yours.

As far as I can tell, most Canadians are *not* eager to send
their young men and young women to fight and risk dying
on behalf of the American Empire.

Right you are!

Jason Repa

"John J." wrote in message
.. .
Geez Nick. OK, maybe i should have said Afghanistan. Plenty of Canadians
there.

Looks like you missed the point of my post.

No idiot....as usual...the real point flew right over your head.

Jason Repa

"Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message
news:uMp6g.123358$WI1.25903@pd7tw2no...
Phil, i'm not the kind of guy to brag about my size and strength while
hiding behind the computer as you like to do,

hey, i'm just a patzer these days, would lose to an electirc toaster

even though there is nothing impressive about you. This is typical fare
for a coward who can't deal with things face to face. 6'3" doesn't impress
me....i'm 6'5".

cool! can you still focus on the ground? i'm starting to need glasses to
drive and also see if my shoewlaces ar tied

And climbing mountains doesn't make you a tough guy....

more an endurance thing than explosive strength - although you need some to
wham an iceaxe three inches into a face

nor does pretending to be tough in your usenet posts by trying to convince
people that you kick ass

only if they run away - i am not so much interested in men's bottoms as is
more commonly admitted

when someone insults your family and telling everyone you have a rifle.
The truth is you've probably had your pathetic ass kicked so many
times.....you've relented to making violent postings on the internet
instead of talking like that in person. Face it Phil, you're an old man
that can't fight your way out of a paper bag.

true, getting old is secretly depressing - old people don't talk about it
because younger people become bored and avoid the issue

I could probably knock your mouthpiece mountain climber ass out with one
punch.

of course, only people who have not so much experience in actual fighting
forecast what they are going to do, what they do, and what they have done -
often they do not consider to whom they write, as if, what they said of
themselves superceded their opponent. this sometimes results in a
dissapointing experience in any actual encounter

now, here is the complication - quite often in conflicts people are most
afraid of themselves - so they say about others what they are themselves
most afraid of [think about this a moment, is it bull****, or is it true, in
your experience?]

and the next thing is that there are those people who know this, and who
manipulate this fact. they use words to be clever and to try to control you,
by their knowledge

when in conflict with others, this is useful information to know, otherwise
clever people with words always seem to win and frustrate your insight -
which you know is a true insight, but in speaking about it, they become
untrue and lost

even great geniuses have said this about themselves

there is a flash, right ? and then you see clearly

what is hard is to communicate it

But my hope would be that you could take a punch, so I'd be able to give
you a real nice beating.

exciting phantasy, no? but really, only a phantasy

I don't like your chances in a chess match either. Your 2044 uscf rating
is worth about 1750 cfc.

that was some time ago, i should doubt its worth more than 1200 now,
depreciation and all

I proved that by beating every american "expert" I ever played....such as
Don Aldrich, Kurt Brasket, etc. Also, you're probably not even worth
anywhere near 2044 anyway.

yeah - but who knows really?

You're a tired old man on the decline, and your uscf membership expired
ten years ago.

you can;'t see me, but tears are running down my face

Repa,Jason (1960) - Aldrich,Don (2080) [A02]
Canadian Open 1997 Winnipeg (5), 15.07.1997
[Repa,Jason]

1.f4

Really!

e5

Another really!

2.fxe5 d6 3.exd6 Bxd6 4.Nf3 g5 5.d4 g4 6.Ng5 f5 7.e4 f4 8.Nh3 gxh3 9.Qh5+
Kf8 10.e5 Bb4+ 11.c3 Qxd4 12.cxb4 Qe4+ 13.Be2 hxg2 14.Rg1 Nc6 15.Nc3 Qf5
16.Rxg2 Qxh5 17.Bxh5 Nxe5 18.Bxf4 Nd3+ 19.Kd2 Nxf4 20.Rf1 Be6 21.Rxf4+ Ke7
22.Rg7+ Kd6 23.Rd4+ Ke5 24.Re4+ Kf6 25.Rxc7 the paper "expert" resigns
here 1-0

would you like me to comment on your game, or maybe you have analysed it
very much already? do you know your own weak moves? would you say you won
the game or basically he lost it?

Anytime you grow some balls instead of hiding from the world in the
usenet,

ain't that like it is!

come to Winnipeg for some Chess n Boxing.

Okay! thank you for the invitation.

Phil Innes

Repa,Jason (1960) - Aldrich,Don (2080) [A02]
Canadian Open 1997 Winnipeg (5), 15.07.1997
[Repa,Jason]

1.f4

Really!

e5

Another really!

2.fxe5 d6 3.exd6 Bxd6 4.Nf3 g5 5.d4 g4 6.Ng5 f5 7.e4 f4 8.Nh3 gxh3 9.Qh5+
Kf8 10.e5 Bb4+ 11.c3 Qxd4 12.cxb4 Qe4+ 13.Be2 hxg2 14.Rg1 Nc6 15.Nc3 Qf5
16.Rxg2 Qxh5 17.Bxh5 Nxe5 18.Bxf4 Nd3+ 19.Kd2 Nxf4 20.Rf1 Be6 21.Rxf4+
Ke7 22.Rg7+ Kd6 23.Rd4+ Ke5 24.Re4+ Kf6 25.Rxc7 the paper "expert"
resigns here 1-0

Forgot to ask - what is the time control in this game? Phil


would you like me to comment on your game, or maybe you have analysed it
very much already? do you know your own weak moves? would you say you won
the game or basically he lost it?

Anytime you grow some balls instead of hiding from the world in the
usenet,

ain't that like it is!

come to Winnipeg for some Chess n Boxing.

Okay! thank you for the invitation.

Phil Innes

"Chess One" wrote in message news:xdu6g.9581$b77.2715@trndny03...
|
| "Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message
| news:uMp6g.123358$WI1.25903@pd7tw2no...
| come to Winnipeg for some Chess n Boxing.
|
| Okay! thank you for the invitation.
|
| Phil Innes
|

Exciting times here, folks! It's Pillsbury Doughboy Repa vs.
Mountain Man Innes! A battle royal between two middle-aged
heavyweights!

When can we buy tickets to this thriller?

"Chess One" wrote in message
news:xdu6g.9581$b77.2715@trndny03...

"Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message
news:uMp6g.123358$WI1.25903@pd7tw2no...
Phil, i'm not the kind of guy to brag about my size and strength while
hiding behind the computer as you like to do,

hey, i'm just a patzer these days, would lose to an electirc toaster

even though there is nothing impressive about you. This is typical fare
for a coward who can't deal with things face to face. 6'3" doesn't
impress me....i'm 6'5".

cool! can you still focus on the ground? i'm starting to need glasses to
drive and also see if my shoewlaces ar tied



Hmmm....you start off butting into a heated thread that has nothing to do
with you......telling everyone that you have a gun and making violent
threats, etc, and now you're trying to be civil. Did your generic-brand
psychotropic medication just kick in?


And climbing mountains doesn't make you a tough guy....

more an endurance thing than explosive strength - although you need some
to wham an iceaxe three inches into a face

Cool! I lift weights and run on a treadmill. Do I get a red star or
something?



when someone insults your family and telling everyone you have a rifle.
The truth is you've probably had your pathetic ass kicked so many
times.....you've relented to making violent postings on the internet
instead of talking like that in person. Face it Phil, you're an old man
that can't fight your way out of a paper bag.


true, getting old is secretly depressing - old people don't talk about it
because younger people become bored and avoid the issue

Again, why didn't you talk to me in a civil fashion in the beginning? You
start off bragging about owning a firearm and pretending to be "The
Terminator" and now you want to make light jokes and be decent. Is it
because you're afraid? Or did those generic SSRI's really kick in???


I could probably knock your mouthpiece mountain climber ass out with one
punch.

of course, only people who have not so much experience in actual fighting
forecast what they are going to do, what they do, and what they have
done - often they do not consider to whom they write, as if, what they
said of themselves superceded their opponent. this sometimes results in a
dissapointing experience in any actual encounter

You're talking out of your ass again Innes. Just when I thought there might
be some hope for you as your tone had suddenly become more civil.
Professional fighters always talk about what they could (and would) do to
their prospective opponents well in advance of their encounter. Ever hear a
Mike Tyson interview? Ken Shamrock was recently interviewed as he is getting
ready to fight a rematch with Tito Ortiz....and he went into detail about
how he is going to pulverize his opposition. I'm no professional fighter,
but I know with every fibre of my being that I could knock the living ****
out of mouthpiece jackass usenet trolls like you, Bauer, Nemmers, etc
(probably all at the same time) without even working up a sweat. I've been
waiting for someone to take me up on this offer but there have been no
takers as of yet. I don't want to wait until i'm your age when I may need a
rifle to defend myself.


now, here is the complication - quite often in conflicts people are most
afraid of themselves - so they say about others what they are themselves
most afraid of [think about this a moment, is it bull****, or is it true,
in your experience?]


The phrase that most aptly describes you is "a little bit of knowledge is a
dangerous thing". Being old doesn't make you wise Innes. There are plenty of
old-timer, know-nothing jackasses like you around. People tolerate you
because you connect them to a different time period and are amusing to laugh
at. While you were spending your days doing clerical work and performing
your usual daily mediocrity, I was studying the likes of Carl G. Jung and
Nietzsche, so if you think you're impressing me with your pop psychology 101
reference to a concept known as PROJECTION you are sadly mistaken. What am I
going to read in your next post.....how you can impress your friends at
parties by administering the Myers-Briggs typology test? Amateur hour is
over Innes. You need to work harder than that to impress me.




Repa,Jason (1960) - Aldrich,Don (2080) [A02]
Canadian Open 1997 Winnipeg (5), 15.07.1997
[Repa,Jason]

1.f4

Really!

e5

Another really!


You never heard of the Bird's Opening or the From Gambit before? NIC did an
exhaustive article on it.

Jason Repa

"Chess One" wrote in message
news:%ju6g.4666$HN3.1247@trndny01...

Repa,Jason (1960) - Aldrich,Don (2080) [A02]
Canadian Open 1997 Winnipeg (5), 15.07.1997
[Repa,Jason]

1.f4

Really!

e5

Another really!

2.fxe5 d6 3.exd6 Bxd6 4.Nf3 g5 5.d4 g4 6.Ng5 f5 7.e4 f4 8.Nh3 gxh3
9.Qh5+ Kf8 10.e5 Bb4+ 11.c3 Qxd4 12.cxb4 Qe4+ 13.Be2 hxg2 14.Rg1 Nc6
15.Nc3 Qf5 16.Rxg2 Qxh5 17.Bxh5 Nxe5 18.Bxf4 Nd3+ 19.Kd2 Nxf4 20.Rf1 Be6
21.Rxf4+ Ke7 22.Rg7+ Kd6 23.Rd4+ Ke5 24.Re4+ Kf6 25.Rxc7 the paper
"expert" resigns here 1-0

Forgot to ask - what is the time control in this game? Phil


You really need to ask that question Phil? The game header says it was the
Canadian Open of 1997. How intelligent does one need to be to do the
necessary research to find out that this was a regular tournament slow chess
rated event?

"Chess Freak" wrote in message
t...

"Chess One" wrote in message
news:xdu6g.9581$b77.2715@trndny03...
|
| "Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message
| news:uMp6g.123358$WI1.25903@pd7tw2no...
| come to Winnipeg for some Chess n Boxing.
|
| Okay! thank you for the invitation.
|
| Phil Innes
|

Exciting times here, folks! It's Pillsbury Doughboy Repa vs.
Mountain Man Innes! A battle royal between two middle-aged
heavyweights!

35 is "middle-aged"?

Jason Repa

"Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message
news:2fz6g.126691$WI1.68938@pd7tw2no...

Hmmm....you start off butting into a heated thread that has nothing to do
with you......telling everyone that you have a gun

no no no - that's too exciting, used to have to one carry around, is what i
said - it has the opposite effect of glamorising guns

and making violent threats, etc, and now you're trying to be civil. Did
your generic-brand psychotropic medication just kick in?

sometimes people's motives are overdetermined, you know that term, not one
thing, but a complexity

more an endurance thing than explosive strength - although you need some
to wham an iceaxe three inches into a face

Cool! I lift weights and run on a treadmill. Do I get a red star or
something?

oddly enough mountain climbing has different requirements - upper body
strength is less important than legs, treadmill work is good but generally
the trouble with gym-training is that it doesn't snow in a gym, and its not
cold, and you can stop moving without freezing. but the main difference is
that you have less exertion rather than more - but it needs to be more
concentrated, since mistakes traversing a slope have severe consequencies
whereas in a gym nothing of consequence happens if you mess up

its a bit like chess, playing well for 20 moves - and then one goof from
lack of attention sinks all your prospects!

-------

You're talking out of your ass again Innes. Just when I thought there
might be some hope for you as your tone had suddenly become more civil.

But its just talk Jason! Which has a range of moods - and as you say, lots
of people BS about themselves. Its not talk about real stuff, is it? I can't
climb a wall like a fly, can't beat Kasparov and maybe can't beat Tapper!
Who knows?

If you want to know something about aggression abandon psychological talk
and read Lorenz. He, rightly, said shrinks had got it very wrong, and
actually said how necessary aggression was in society.

Professional fighters always talk about what they could (and would) do to
their prospective opponents well in advance of their encounter. Ever hear
a Mike Tyson interview? Ken Shamrock was recently interviewed as he is
getting ready to fight a rematch with Tito Ortiz....and he went into
detail about how he is going to pulverize his opposition. I'm no
professional fighter, but I know with every fibre of my being that I could
knock the living **** out of mouthpiece jackass usenet trolls like you,
Bauer, Nemmers, etc

But you don't know! You don't /really/ know that, or if you can beat anyone
at chess. What you DO know is that aggression pays off - and if you find a
'chess player' without aggression then maybe they are not real chess
players? The problem is how to use that aggression in a fight or a game.

Big-time chess players DEFINITELY have it. Some people give it off like an
aura - you can feel it. Taimanov said Fischer had it, Kasparov has it, but
most of all in his experience Tal had it more than anyone. He didn't just
want to win the game, he wanted to beat YOU, and he wanted YOU to know it.
It wasn't anything said - but maybe stronger than anything that can be said.

But for you and me as chess players, how to use that energy to play chess?
Its the same on the mountain, tough guys, even really tough guys, often get
hurt, or embarass themselves and have to be helped home, because CONTROL of
that energy is difficult.

(probably all at the same time) without even working up a sweat. I've been
waiting for someone to take me up on this offer but there have been no
takers as of yet. I don't want to wait until i'm your age when I may need
a rifle to defend myself.

This is sort of jokey guy-talk, but just the usual bull****ting, right?

The trouble with fighting old guys, actually fighting or playing chess, is
that they have less obvious aggression, but far more control - they have had
more opportunity to channel their energy and put it to use. Rule #2 of
fighting is to notice what or who you are fighting!

Look at all these young buck street blitz players - they are experts at
throwing you off your game, right? Its a critical position, and they razz
you by insulting your mother! Its a good tactic, interrupts your thought,
and your emotions make you numb to what's happening - your energy isn't
going into the game any more. They understand what fuels good chess play,
and how to screw you up.

now, here is the complication - quite often in conflicts people are most
afraid of themselves - so they say about others what they are themselves
most afraid of [think about this a moment, is it bull****, or is it true,
in your experience?]


The phrase that most aptly describes you is "a little bit of knowledge is
a dangerous thing". Being old doesn't make you wise Innes. There are
plenty of old-timer, know-nothing jackasses like you around. People
tolerate you because you connect them to a different time period and are
amusing to laugh at. While you were spending your days doing clerical work
and performing your usual daily mediocrity, I was studying the likes of
Carl G. Jung and Nietzsche,

Nietzsche is a depresing old bloke with a beard, went nuts!

so if you think you're impressing me with your pop psychology 101
reference to a concept known as PROJECTION you are sadly mistaken.

You are mistaken, it doesn't LIMIT you to 101. But what is in 101 isn't
become irrelevant because you can also do 201. That's an error in your
logic.

What am I going to read in your next post.....how you can impress your
friends at parties by administering the Myers-Briggs typology test?

BLINK. If you are bored with the standard crap - or rather how people talk
about it - you are likely to understand Adaptive Unconscious.

Amateur hour is over Innes. You need to work harder than that to impress
me.

O! Be careful of that! Let's say I write to express myself rather than to
impress you. Now I have an advantage, right?

And let's also say that I am interested in people who can express themselves
about what they OBSERVE about their own experience - not what they SPECULATE
upon, about what they have not observed. Those people become boring to write
with, and same as on a mountain, because they are in their heads, they don't
observe much, and you are going to have to carry them home or leave them
where they fell.

That's simpler, isn't it?

The alternative is to continue to speculate with other people who also know
**** about anything - and ALL you know is that everyone is lying - or just
guessing. Its a choice. This isn't easy, its tough. Mouthing off about it is
easy, so is pointing out that mouthing off is a kind of lying.



Repa,Jason (1960) - Aldrich,Don (2080) [A02]
Canadian Open 1997 Winnipeg (5), 15.07.1997
[Repa,Jason]

1.f4

Really!

e5

Another really!


You never heard of the Bird's Opening or the From Gambit before? NIC did
an exhaustive article on it.

That ain't exactly what I asked. I wondered if you thought he lost it, or if
you won it, and if you saw your own weak move. But I don't care if you
don't.

Cordially, Phil

Jason Repa

Randy Bauer wrote:

I appreciate your post. Jason is a sick soul who has gone so far as to
take a picture of my wife and me once posted on Matt Nemmer's site with
pictures of RGCP posters, crop me out of the picture, then post it on
dating sites.

He is obviously mentally ill. I am not concerned about him in the
physical sense -- I've had others send me pics from Canadian
tournaments, and he is a slouching Pillsbury doughboy type. I suspect
he lives at home, and when working, he and asks if people want fries
with their burger.

Given the choice of saving Sam or Jason from a burning building, Sam
will be my choice.

Randy Bauer

Thank you so much.

But Jason is the Champion of Winnepeg
Plus, he has a famous movie character named after him.

Does not that count for anything with you?

Sam