![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: jail, sam, sloan |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#81
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jason (the grim) Repa wrote: "Chess Freak" wrote in message t... "Chess One" wrote in message news:xdu6g.9581$b77.2715@trndny03... | | "Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message | news:uMp6g.123358$WI1.25903@pd7tw2no... | come to Winnipeg for some Chess n Boxing. | | Okay! thank you for the invitation. | | Phil Innes | Exciting times here, folks! It's Pillsbury Doughboy Repa vs. Mountain Man Innes! A battle royal between two middle-aged heavyweights! 35 is "middle-aged"? Jason Repa Yep! avg lifespan is about 80. Divide that by three(1/3 youth; 1/3 middle;1/3 old age) youth lasts from birth till appx age 26 or 27. Middle age till about 53 or 54; old age last from 53 or 54 until death. Rob |
| Ads |
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
|
LOL. This from a guy who didn't want to divulge his address because he
was afraid we'd come up to Winnepeg to throw eggs at his house. Yes, WE are all the cowards who won't come to him, yet I don't see him going out of his way to meet anyone else. Now Jason is going to call me a pathetic snivelling coward that hides behind his computer and tell me how I have **** for brains because my rating is only 1600 (actually, it's less!). Oh, and how he'll be sure to take care of me the next time he's in the Greater Boston area. Yawn... John Jason (the grim) Repa wrote: Let us recall who started with whom Bauer. I hadn't even heard of you until you started butting into my argument with Matt Nemmers and flaming me a few years back. You went out of your way to start with me even though the thread had nothing whatsoever to do with you. I know a mentally-deficient piece of **** loser like you who's only achievements are through lying, cheating, and breaking the rules can't comprehend this, but you picked the wrong guy to start a fight with. And here you go again with your cowardly reference to hiding behind the state for protection and running away from the fights that you started. You're the kind of guy who as a child would ring doorbells and run away, or taunt others and run to the teacher, or some other authority figure for protection when you got caught and were being dealt with. You are the epitome of a coward and a weasel Bauer. Sooner or later we likely will be in the same room somewhere, and I won't be requiring your volition. Who will you run to then? Jason Repa |
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message news:%FL6g.128281$WI1.59895@pd7tw2no... sometimes people's motives are overdetermined, you know that term, not one thing, but a complexity I'm quite good at profilling people and you've made it very clear that your waters don't run that deep Innes. Interesting in what you chose to say and what not. A "complexity" to a guy like you is watching Jerry Springer while making a cheese sandwich. You have a TV in your kitchen - or you make the sandwiches in your living room? What is 'complexity' is not 101 emotions with Jerry, its 1001 assessment of the Warren Harding Error. I'm not going to waste any more time trying to educate a psuedo-intellectual mouthpiece pansy such as yourself. Good! I indicated the same to you - basically only ******s try to influence other people as their main motive, no? Rather than just say, for me, it happens like this. As hard as you're trying, True again! But also by the usual inversion of logic of what is observable. Is it really me or you who is trying to impress the other? you still haven't impressed me Proof of something? Why, eg, should I want to? And why should you mention it quite often? ![]() Innes, and I doubt you ever will. More speculation? zzzz You have already recognised I offered you a test on relating from experience or being just like others. Pity! You have all the right attributes to be a good player, except self-discipline, and settle for being a yet another zzzz commentator. No regrets for me! We don't meet anywhere that interest me. Phil Innes Jason Repa |
|
#84
|
|||
|
|||
|
All anyone needs to do to meet with me personally is give me some
notification as to when they'll be in my city and they have my word i'll show up and be alone as well. They won't be coming over for drinks so my address isn't required. You know you you would even have the guts to come and see me in person Swartz. I don't need to call you a spineless coward, you already admitted to being one yourself. You at least know what you are. And your IQ is too low to play chess. With all that hard word and study you've done you can't do better than 1600....ROFL! You should stick to tic-tac-toe and go-fish. Jason Repa |
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
|
No wonder you couldn't cut it at chess Innes. You take a primitive approach
to problem-solving and make allot of invalid assumptions (another hallmark of a weak mind). You try to compensate for your lack of genuine intelligence by making the occassional obscure reference and regurgitating something you read. Your facade is completely transparent. And I know you're working like a dog to try to impress me Innes but there will be no gold star for you. I'll give you a red checkmark for effort though. It happens from time to time but it's not everyday I'm the object of someone's obsession as a puppy dog obsesses about his master. Go climb up the wall of a school or something, and stop littering the Usenet with your drivel. Jason Repa |
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message news:_5M6g.127163$7a.119252@pd7tw1no... No wonder you couldn't cut it at chess Innes. You take a primitive approach to problem-solving and make allot of invalid assumptions (another hallmark of a weak mind). You try to compensate for your lack of genuine intelligence by making the occassional obscure reference and regurgitating something you read. Your facade is completely transparent. And I know you're working like a dog to try to impress me Innes Jason, having once indicated what I was interested in, and the second time made it clear what was a really a brush off, are you really thinking you are engaging anyone with your insistent protests about those trying to impress you? That's not really so credible is it? but there will be no gold star for you. I'll give you a red checkmark for effort though. It happens from time to time but it's not everyday I'm the object of someone's obsession as a puppy dog obsesses about his master. Go climb up the wall of a school or something, and stop littering the Usenet with your drivel. This is quite a good post, for a non chess player on newsnet. It is sufficiently abstract as to apply to any person on any subject, and as sui generis commentary, quite well done according to its type. I regret that it is not to my interest to engage further, since all mention of chess content by way of experiential reflections have now dissapeared. Cordially, Phil Innes Jason Repa |
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
|
All anyone needs to do to meet with me personally is give me some notification as to when they'll be in my city and they have my word i'll show up and be alone as well. Of course you will...all 6'5" of you...because your "word" means so much to everyone on this forum... But seriously, Jason, I don't have so much disposable income and free time as to make a special trip up to your area, even if I believed you'd show up. And if I did, I'll let you know right now that I wouldn't show up alone - not because I would be afraid of you, or need any assistance - I'd just like someone there with a video camera so that we could record our meeting for posterity (and maybe the amusement of others on this forum). They won't be coming over for drinks so my address isn't required. You know you you would even have the guts to come and see me in person Swartz. Sounds to me like you're the one hiding behind a computer...oh, I know, I have your "word"... "you you..." Why Jason, I do believe you're stuttering... ;-) I don't need to call you a spineless coward, you already admitted to being one yourself. You at least know what you are. Sorry, I admitted to know such thing - I merely pointed out what I expected your response to my post would be - having seen it so many times already... And your IQ is too low to play chess. I'll never beat Kasparov, but so what? Neither will you...guess you should give it up too. With all that hard word and study you've done you can't do better than 1600.... Who says I've put in a lot of hard work and study? You really make too many assumptions... Oh, and by the way, don't feel like you need to respond to this - it is, afterall, Friday, not to mention Cinco de Mayo - I'd much rather go drink a few beers and enjoy the nice weather we're having here in New England today than reply back. John Swartz |
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
|
You're the only person I've said is trying to impress me Innes. Not anyone
else. Your cheap, pseudo-intellectual, beer hall argument tactics don't work with me. My comment, as indicated, was directed towards you and you only. As I've told you several times....amatuer hour has long been over. You've been so desperately trying to impress me, as a student who rides the short bus to school tries to impress his homeroom teacher by spelling his name correctly and tying his own shoes. The problem is, you're nothing more than a prozaic clerk who spends an enormous time on the internet because you're a failure in the real world. You're also very predictable, and I know you're going to make some reference to how I must be "projecting" here. You learned a new word this week and now you want to show everyone how "smart" you are by repeating it over and over, even if out of context. The simple truth is you're just a laughing stock Innes. First you start off pretending to be a hero by saying how you could kick anyone's ass who insulted your family and making a vieled threat in response to my factual posting about Mr. Bauer. Then you try to impress everyone by bragging about being 6'3" and pretending to be a big tough mountain climber. After that you start trying to suck my cock by changing your tone from aggressive to friendly and try to pretend to be smart by making a couple of cheap, semi-obsure references in order to impress me. Your plan backfired as you've made it clear you don't understand what you're talking about. You're also the biggest hypocrite in this usenet! Recall how you said in your original trolling flame post: "I rather doubt that any of these taunts would be uttered face to face, since as men we'd knock the living **** out of anyone who insulted our families or ourselves." then only a few posts later you say: "of course, only people who have not so much experience in actual fighting forecast what they are going to do, what they do, and what they have done" which is a direct contradiction to the first post. How incredibly stupid do you have to be to contradict yourself so quickly and so utterly? Innes, seriously you half-wit, garden-variety, jackass......go back to your "scrabble cheaters" usenet group and annoy people there. You've long ceased to be of any amusement to anyone. Jason Repa "Chess One" wrote in message news:n%M6g.9$Ky5.5@trndny08... "Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message news:_5M6g.127163$7a.119252@pd7tw1no... No wonder you couldn't cut it at chess Innes. You take a primitive approach to problem-solving and make allot of invalid assumptions (another hallmark of a weak mind). You try to compensate for your lack of genuine intelligence by making the occassional obscure reference and regurgitating something you read. Your facade is completely transparent. And I know you're working like a dog to try to impress me Innes Jason, having once indicated what I was interested in, and the second time made it clear what was a really a brush off, are you really thinking you are engaging anyone with your insistent protests about those trying to impress you? That's not really so credible is it? but there will be no gold star for you. I'll give you a red checkmark for effort though. It happens from time to time but it's not everyday I'm the object of someone's obsession as a puppy dog obsesses about his master. Go climb up the wall of a school or something, and stop littering the Usenet with your drivel. This is quite a good post, for a non chess player on newsnet. It is sufficiently abstract as to apply to any person on any subject, and as sui generis commentary, quite well done according to its type. I regret that it is not to my interest to engage further, since all mention of chess content by way of experiential reflections have now dissapeared. Cordially, Phil Innes Jason Repa |
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John A Swartz" wrote in message ... All anyone needs to do to meet with me personally is give me some notification as to when they'll be in my city and they have my word i'll show up and be alone as well. Of course you will...all 6'5" of you...because your "word" means so much to everyone on this forum You don't speak for everyone Swartz. You can't even speak properly for yourself. You're a physical and mental weakling of a man who trolls around in a chess newsgroup even though you can't do better than a 1600 elo in the game. Nobody has a shred of respect for you or pays any serious attention to any of the drivel that spews from your keyboard. You're a talentless, know-nothing loser in all faucets of life....not just in chess. And Nobody has once made the offer so my word has never even being in question. A guy named John MacNab or something like that, who lives in Canada also, once said he wanted to meet with me in person but backed down later when I tried to arrange the details. Just like you're backing down right now, as you did before. You're whining about being too broke to come see me....now there's an original excuse....ROFL! You're 100%, certifiable, sniveling coward! As you've already admitted many times. Jason Repa |
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jason (the grim) Repa" wrote in message news:rwN6g.128428$WI1.113485@pd7tw2no... You're the only person I've said is trying to impress me Innes. Not anyone else. Your cheap, pseudo-intellectual, beer hall argument tactics don't work with me. My comment, as indicated, was directed towards you and you only. As I've told you several times....amatuer hour has long been over. You've been so desperately trying to impress me, as a student who rides the short bus to school tries to impress his homeroom teacher by spelling his name correctly and tying his own shoes. Jason. allow me to 'try to' impress you no more - I keep offering to 'pass' but... The problem is, you're nothing more than a prozaic clerk who spends an enormous time on the internet because you're a failure in the real world. You're also very predictable, and I know you're going to make some reference to how I must be "projecting" here. You learned a new word this week and now you want to show everyone how "smart" you are by repeating it over and over, even if out of context. The simple truth is you're just a laughing stock Innes. First you start off pretending to be a hero by saying how you could kick anyone's ass who insulted your family and making a vieled threat in response to my factual posting about Mr. Bauer. Then you try to impress everyone by bragging about being 6'3" and pretending to be a big tough mountain climber. After that you start trying to suck my cock by changing your tone from aggressive to friendly and try to pretend to be smart by making a couple of cheap, semi-obsure references in order to impress me. Your plan backfired as you've made it clear you don't understand what you're talking about. You're also the biggest hypocrite in this usenet! Recall how you said in your original trolling flame post: "I rather doubt that any of these taunts would be uttered face to face, since as men we'd knock the living **** out of anyone who insulted our families or ourselves." then only a few posts later you say: "of course, only people who have not so much experience in actual fighting forecast what they are going to do, what they do, and what they have done" Did you want to discuss that? For someone so dismissive of someone else at such length, I am prepared to ignore it - even though you pay me so much attention. But you can't do both, boy. You can't want to argue and also pretend you are not interested. So chose. Own an interest or get lost. which is a direct contradiction to the first post. How incredibly stupid do you have to be to contradict yourself so quickly and so utterly? Innes, seriously you half-wit, garden-variety, jackass......go back to your "scrabble cheaters" usenet group and annoy people there. You've long ceased to be of any amusement to anyone. Jason Repa Not bad again! But really! You do seem to be pursuing me for something... and why should you demonstrate such extravagent attention on someone who you do not esteem? I know, so do you. its okay, there is nothing that can be resolved here - you think you are fighting, but its just talking fighting Phil |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sam Sloan - Jail? | John J. | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 106 | May 29th 06 03:13 AM |
| Request for Arbitration of Paul Rubin vs. Sam Sloan | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 45 | March 27th 06 04:38 AM |
| Request for Arbitration of Paul Rubin vs. Sam Sloan | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 45 | March 27th 06 04:38 AM |
| Books and DVDs by Sam Sloan | Richard | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 6 | December 11th 05 12:44 AM |
| Books and DVDs by Sam Sloan | Richard | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 8 | December 11th 05 12:44 AM |