![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: bessel, chess, kok, letter, open, proposal, regarding, unity |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Open letter by Bessel Kok regarding proposal for Chess Unity
15.05.2006 OPEN LETTER TO PROPOSAL BY MR IGNATIUS LEONG Dear Mr Leong, I have studied your open letter and your attempt to propose some form of compromise. The Right Move Team and its supporting Federations have some obvious concerns with this particular form of compromise which has occurred in several past FIDE elections. The Right Move is not afraid of the ballot box. We are in an election campaign precisely for the purpose of making badly needed changes in FIDE, not perpetuating the status quo. FIDE Statutes have been ignored consistently in the past, always with the claim of being in the interest of chess. We, on the other hand, have pledged and carried out an open, honest, transparent campaign from the very first day. A large working team of advisors from all areas of the chess world have contributed their ideas and we have formed a range of proposals based upon their contributions. Federations have been crying out for years, for somebody to listen to them and to work with them in developing chess in countries all over the world. They have been asking to participate in the management of FIDE which, unfortunately, has been restricted to a few back-scratching friends. We have strong support from many Federations all over the world who want to see a new FIDE based on competence, strategic direction, open communication and more importantly, honesty and transparency. You proposal suffers from two fatal defects. * Firstly, it is contrary to the FIDE statutes and is illegal. * Secondly, we will not misplace the trust placed in us by the Federations supporting us and desiring a change in line with the programs and ideas we have delivered to date. We ask both sides to respect the outcome of the election. Furthermore, when elected, the Right Move will welcome with open arms anyone who wishes to work for the good of chess, regardless of how they may have voted. In this way we will achieve unity. I am sure that anybody who truly holds chess close to his heart will continue to support it, no matter what role he may play in a future FIDE. We therefore respectfully decline your proposal. Bessel Kok Candidate for FIDE President |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sam Sloan wrote: Open letter by Bessel Kok regarding proposal for Chess Unity 15.05.2006 OPEN LETTER TO PROPOSAL BY MR IGNATIUS LEONG Dear Mr Leong, I have studied your open letter and your attempt to propose some form of compromise. The Right Move Team and its supporting Federations have some obvious concerns with this particular form of compromise which has occurred in several past FIDE elections. The Right Move is not afraid of the ballot box. We are in an election campaign precisely for the purpose of making badly needed changes in FIDE, not perpetuating the status quo. FIDE Statutes have been ignored consistently in the past, always with the claim of being in the interest of chess. We, on the other hand, have pledged and carried out an open, honest, transparent campaign from the very first day. A large working team of advisors from all areas of the chess world have contributed their ideas and we have formed a range of proposals based upon their contributions. Federations have been crying out for years, for somebody to listen to them and to work with them in developing chess in countries all over the world. They have been asking to participate in the management of FIDE which, unfortunately, has been restricted to a few back-scratching friends. We have strong support from many Federations all over the world who want to see a new FIDE based on competence, strategic direction, open communication and more importantly, honesty and transparency. You proposal suffers from two fatal defects. * Firstly, it is contrary to the FIDE statutes and is illegal. * Secondly, we will not misplace the trust placed in us by the Federations supporting us and desiring a change in line with the programs and ideas we have delivered to date. We ask both sides to respect the outcome of the election. Furthermore, when elected, the Right Move will welcome with open arms anyone who wishes to work for the good of chess, regardless of how they may have voted. In this way we will achieve unity. I am sure that anybody who truly holds chess close to his heart will continue to support it, no matter what role he may play in a future FIDE. We therefore respectfully decline your proposal. Bessel Kok Candidate for FIDE President BRAVO!! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MY OPEN LETTER ON FIDE ELECTION | chessdon | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 1 | May 18th 06 04:03 PM |
| Open letter to new editor | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 233 | April 9th 06 12:49 AM |
| Open letter to new editor | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 243 | April 9th 06 12:49 AM |
| A Open Letter to the FIDE Delegate Stalker | Ambassador | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 2 | March 25th 06 03:14 PM |
| A Open Letter to the FIDE Delegate Stalker | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 0 | March 25th 06 03:14 PM |