"Randy Bauer" Go back to my post and actually read it this time. That
thing at the
tip of my post, it's called the vent-hole. Admit you're attracted to my
gross purplish penis and then say you're sorry and promise to do better next
time.


I am sorry. I did not see the little hole the first time.

This thread was originally posted on May 25, 2006 at 8:55 AM. It was
posted to http://www.uschess.org/forums at the same time.

Almost immediately, efforts were made to stop viewers from reading
this posting. Rob changed the header here several times to other
headers which would conceal what it was about, including "Thread
Changed".

Over on http://www.uschess.org/forums several readers called for the
posting to b e deleted.

Over there, Mike Nolan replied that he prefered that the people
involved should respond. He disagreed that the posting should be
simply removed.

The only person involved who actually did respond was Beatriz
Marinello, but she did not say anything of substance or address the
charges.

Actually, everything I wrote in my initial posting is well documented
and well known. Anybody who thinks that they were "wild charges" as
one poster opined simoly has not been reading these groups regularly.
This was basically "old news". The only relatively new issue was the
Zoning Issue and since then Joel Channing, who is on top of the issue,
has confirmed that this is still a problem which has not been
clarified much less resolved.

Finally, on May 31, 2006, a full six days after my initial posting,
Laura Martz, a full time member of the USCF Office staff, deleted and
removed my posting from http://www.uschess.org/forums . It seems that
this was done at the request of Alan Kantor, another full time
employee of the USCF Office.

Obviously, employees are not going to like this posting and are going
to feel threatened by it. But, should employees be allowed to censor
political forum postings that they do not like?

Sam Sloan

"Sam Sloan" Obviously, employees are not going to like this posting and
are going
to feel threatened by it. But, should employees be allowed to censor
political forum postings that they do not like?


In case you have not noticed, Marinello and the scum running the USCF are
not just totally corrupt, but they are using the USCF for their own personal
gain and could care less about issues, fairness, or anything else.

As long as the members pay their dues and buy whatever crap is being sold,
the USCF exists unto itself. No debate or discussion will change anything.