A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

Why Wayne Praeder is wrong about Term Limits



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 26th 06, 04:15 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess
Sam Sloan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,556
Default Why Wayne Praeder is wrong about Term Limits

Quote:
Originally Posted by WPraeder
We appreciate their long standing service but I
agree it's time for the people who have been controlling the USCF to
go to make room for some new blood. Perhaps the delegates should
reconsider implementing the idea that board members be restricted to
only two total terms in office. For information on the concept of term
limits see: http://charitychannel.com/publish/templates/?a=279&z=19

Regards,
Wayne Praeder
What Wayne Praeder proposes is exactly the opposite of what we need.

What we need is a way to induce the good board members who served in
the past to come back and run again.

We had some excellent board members back in the late 1980s and early
1990s, men like Fred Gruenberg, John Donaldson and Jerry Hanken.

When they were on the board, the USCF was profitable. It was during
their terms of service that the USCF built up the $2 million dollars
in the LMA. This two million dollars was completely squandered by
recent boards and has been completely lost.

The best or worse example depending on whether you agree with me or
with Wayne Praeder, is Jerry Hanken. I realize that a lot of people do
not like Jerry, but he was elected four times to the board, more than
anybody else, and served ten years. The USCF was profitable in every
one of those ten years.

By contrast look at the current list. This year, we have the worst
line-up of candidates ever (not counting me of course) in the history
of the USCF.

Sam Sloan
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why is poker getting so much attention and not chess? Alberich rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 68 February 15th 06 09:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Personal Finance - Loans - Refinance - Savings - Credit Counseling