![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: been, channing, goichberg, ive, muzzled |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've been muzzled by Joel Channing and Bill Goichberg. The USCF
attorney was also behind the idea of getting me off the board if I continue to recklessly attacking people. They told me to zip my mouth or else. This really sucks big time. I was fairly elected by the people to expose many USCF dirty little secrets. I can't even talk about it now. They also want me to hush about the proposed move to Palm Beach Gardens. I can't say more than that or Joel Channing would sue me. If you want to know more then email me privately. I can't say anything in public. Sam Sloan |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why Palm Beach Gardens?
Old Haasie |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 3 Sep 2006 15:18:57 -0700, " wrote:
Why Palm Beach Gardens? Old Haasie You know.....that is one good question. If I'm a member and I know my membership money is going there then that is an issue indeed. I'm pretty sure USCF members aren't gonna like to hear this if this is true. EZoto |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
EZoto wrote: On 3 Sep 2006 15:18:57 -0700, " wrote: Why Palm Beach Gardens? Old Haasie You know.....that is one good question. If I'm a member and I know my membership money is going there then that is an issue indeed. I'm pretty sure USCF members aren't gonna like to hear this if this is true. EZoto I can't say more than what I've already said. The USCF HQ will be moved to Palm Beach Gardens. The financial losses won't matter because Channing will provide the USCF with a free building. Sam Sloan |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 3 Sep 2006 13:35:51 -0700, "Sam Sloan" wrote:
I've been muzzled by Joel Channing and Bill Goichberg. The USCF attorney was also behind the idea of getting me off the board if I continue to recklessly attacking people. They told me to zip my mouth or else. This really sucks big time. I was fairly elected by the people to expose many USCF dirty little secrets. How in the world did you ever conclude this? Is this how you interpreted your election? Aside from whatever shenanigans in New Jersey, isn't it interesting that you could win that region so handily but fail to get elected as a delegate in your own state where they know you so well? I would have thought you were elected to be on the board of the USCF to best serve the interests of the USCF. People aren't elected to boards just to their dirty little secrets? They are elected to serve. If you are saying that your intent was dishonest, that it was only to reveal little secrets, why don't you reveal a few of your little secrets and resign from your once and only time on the board??? Instead of trying to be a gadfly, why don't you try to work with people and stay off R.C.G.P for a couple months. Work with them and do something productive. You can work with people, right? You might actually be able to do something if you worked with them rather than attack them in the net and then complain you get muzzled. Michael Atkins I can't even talk about it now. They also want me to hush about the proposed move to Palm Beach Gardens. I can't say more than that or Joel Channing would sue me. If you want to know more then email me privately. I can't say anything in public. Sam Sloan |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
michael atkins wrote: On 3 Sep 2006 13:35:51 -0700, "Sam Sloan" wrote: I've been muzzled by Joel Channing and Bill Goichberg. The USCF attorney was also behind the idea of getting me off the board if I continue to recklessly attacking people. They told me to zip my mouth or else. This really sucks big time. I was fairly elected by the people to expose many USCF dirty little secrets. How in the world did you ever conclude this? Is this how you interpreted your election? Aside from whatever shenanigans in New Jersey, isn't it interesting that you could win that region so handily but fail to get elected as a delegate in your own state where they know you so well? I would have thought you were elected to be on the board of the USCF to best serve the interests of the USCF. People aren't elected to boards just to their dirty little secrets? They are elected to serve. If you are saying that your intent was dishonest, that it was only to reveal little secrets, why don't you reveal a few of your little secrets and resign from your once and only time on the board??? Instead of trying to be a gadfly, why don't you try to work with people and stay off R.C.G.P for a couple months. Work with them and do something productive. You can work with people, right? You might actually be able to do something if you worked with them rather than attack them in the net and then complain you get muzzled. Michael Atkins I want to expose to the world that Polgar can't play chess that well. She can only win weak tournaments like the world cup and Olympiad. When she played in a strong one like the mayor's cup, she only finished 2nd. Gata is stronger. I also want to expose Channing and his secret plan to move the USCF HQ to Crossville. People elected me to expose these dirty chess secrets. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 15 Sep 2006 19:42:06 -0700, "Sam Sloan"
wrote: michael atkins wrote: On 3 Sep 2006 13:35:51 -0700, "Sam Sloan" wrote: I've been muzzled by Joel Channing and Bill Goichberg. The USCF attorney was also behind the idea of getting me off the board if I continue to recklessly attacking people. They told me to zip my mouth or else. This really sucks big time. I was fairly elected by the people to expose many USCF dirty little secrets. How in the world did you ever conclude this? Is this how you interpreted your election? Aside from whatever shenanigans in New Jersey, isn't it interesting that you could win that region so handily but fail to get elected as a delegate in your own state where they know you so well? I would have thought you were elected to be on the board of the USCF to best serve the interests of the USCF. People aren't elected to boards just to their dirty little secrets? They are elected to serve. If you are saying that your intent was dishonest, that it was only to reveal little secrets, why don't you reveal a few of your little secrets and resign from your once and only time on the board??? Instead of trying to be a gadfly, why don't you try to work with people and stay off R.C.G.P for a couple months. Work with them and do something productive. You can work with people, right? You might actually be able to do something if you worked with them rather than attack them in the net and then complain you get muzzled. Michael Atkins I want to expose to the world that Polgar can't play chess that well. She can only win weak tournaments like the world cup and Olympiad. When she played in a strong one like the mayor's cup, she only finished 2nd. Gata is stronger. I also want to expose Channing and his secret plan to move the USCF HQ to Crossville. People elected me to expose these dirty chess secrets. No they didn't. Did you have it in your Chess Life campaign page that if elected, you will expose all the little dirty secrets. I don't remember that part of your campaign. I'm sure that was always planned and probably said on the net, but not in Chess Life, am I wrong here? She is certainly better that you or I will ever be. Gata is obviously stronger, so what. She's one of the stronger women in the world. I think chess life had way too much of one person in this issue but that doesn't mean she is a weak player Huh - You said you wanted to expose Channing and his secret plan to move the USCF HQ to Crossville?? Is that the secret plan AFTER the secret plan to move it to Florida? MA |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
michael atkins wrote: On 15 Sep 2006 19:42:06 -0700, "Sam Sloan" wrote: michael atkins wrote: On 3 Sep 2006 13:35:51 -0700, "Sam Sloan" wrote: I've been muzzled by Joel Channing and Bill Goichberg. The USCF attorney was also behind the idea of getting me off the board if I continue to recklessly attacking people. They told me to zip my mouth or else. This really sucks big time. I was fairly elected by the people to expose many USCF dirty little secrets. How in the world did you ever conclude this? Is this how you interpreted your election? Aside from whatever shenanigans in New Jersey, isn't it interesting that you could win that region so handily but fail to get elected as a delegate in your own state where they know you so well? I would have thought you were elected to be on the board of the USCF to best serve the interests of the USCF. People aren't elected to boards just to their dirty little secrets? They are elected to serve. If you are saying that your intent was dishonest, that it was only to reveal little secrets, why don't you reveal a few of your little secrets and resign from your once and only time on the board??? Instead of trying to be a gadfly, why don't you try to work with people and stay off R.C.G.P for a couple months. Work with them and do something productive. You can work with people, right? You might actually be able to do something if you worked with them rather than attack them in the net and then complain you get muzzled. Michael Atkins I want to expose to the world that Polgar can't play chess that well. She can only win weak tournaments like the world cup and Olympiad. When she played in a strong one like the mayor's cup, she only finished 2nd. Gata is stronger. I also want to expose Channing and his secret plan to move the USCF HQ to Crossville. People elected me to expose these dirty chess secrets. No they didn't. Did you have it in your Chess Life campaign page that if elected, you will expose all the little dirty secrets. I don't remember that part of your campaign. I'm sure that was always planned and probably said on the net, but not in Chess Life, am I wrong here? She is certainly better that you or I will ever be. Gata is obviously stronger, so what. She's one of the stronger women in the world. I think chess life had way too much of one person in this issue but that doesn't mean she is a weak player Huh - You said you wanted to expose Channing and his secret plan to move the USCF HQ to Crossville?? Is that the secret plan AFTER the secret plan to move it to Florida? MA You obviously know that I meant Palm Beach Gardens. You're making fun of my memory loss. That's low. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is Sam Sloan a coward, afraid to stand up to USCF officials? Look at
Illnois corporate not for profit. Sam Sloan CAN ONLY BE REMOVED BY THE VOTING MEMBERS. You have no legal education, Sam, and this post proves you are a poor advocate. Marcus Roberts Sam Sloan wrote: EZoto wrote: On 3 Sep 2006 15:18:57 -0700, " wrote: Why Palm Beach Gardens? Old Haasie You know.....that is one good question. If I'm a member and I know my membership money is going there then that is an issue indeed. I'm pretty sure USCF members aren't gonna like to hear this if this is true. EZoto I can't say more than what I've already said. The USCF HQ will be moved to Palm Beach Gardens. The financial losses won't matter because Channing will provide the USCF with a free building. Sam Sloan |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 15 Sep 2006 20:25:01 -0700, "Sam Sloan"
wrote: michael atkins wrote: On 15 Sep 2006 19:42:06 -0700, "Sam Sloan" wrote: michael atkins wrote: On 3 Sep 2006 13:35:51 -0700, "Sam Sloan" wrote: I've been muzzled by Joel Channing and Bill Goichberg. The USCF attorney was also behind the idea of getting me off the board if I continue to recklessly attacking people. They told me to zip my mouth or else. This really sucks big time. I was fairly elected by the people to expose many USCF dirty little secrets. How in the world did you ever conclude this? Is this how you interpreted your election? Aside from whatever shenanigans in New Jersey, isn't it interesting that you could win that region so handily but fail to get elected as a delegate in your own state where they know you so well? I would have thought you were elected to be on the board of the USCF to best serve the interests of the USCF. People aren't elected to boards just to their dirty little secrets? They are elected to serve. If you are saying that your intent was dishonest, that it was only to reveal little secrets, why don't you reveal a few of your little secrets and resign from your once and only time on the board??? Instead of trying to be a gadfly, why don't you try to work with people and stay off R.C.G.P for a couple months. Work with them and do something productive. You can work with people, right? You might actually be able to do something if you worked with them rather than attack them in the net and then complain you get muzzled. Michael Atkins I want to expose to the world that Polgar can't play chess that well. She can only win weak tournaments like the world cup and Olympiad. When she played in a strong one like the mayor's cup, she only finished 2nd. Gata is stronger. I also want to expose Channing and his secret plan to move the USCF HQ to Crossville. People elected me to expose these dirty chess secrets. No they didn't. Did you have it in your Chess Life campaign page that if elected, you will expose all the little dirty secrets. I don't remember that part of your campaign. I'm sure that was always planned and probably said on the net, but not in Chess Life, am I wrong here? She is certainly better that you or I will ever be. Gata is obviously stronger, so what. She's one of the stronger women in the world. I think chess life had way too much of one person in this issue but that doesn't mean she is a weak player Huh - You said you wanted to expose Channing and his secret plan to move the USCF HQ to Crossville?? Is that the secret plan AFTER the secret plan to move it to Florida? MA You obviously know that I meant Palm Beach Gardens. You're making fun of my memory loss. That's low. I'm sorry. I just thought it was a funny typo. Now that you admit to a memory loss, perhaps we should discuss memory loss as a pre-condition that warrants removal from the PB? We wouldn't want this to affect PB meetings. You might not even remember when there is a meeting?! But then again, this address seems to be the "Fake" Sam Sloan so who cares anyway MA |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Schultz, Channing, Tanner and Goichberg sold out | Ray Gordon | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 7 | June 14th 06 09:08 PM |
| Goichberg, Schultz, Channing should resign and Marinello should be Pres again | Ray Gordon | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 0 | February 16th 06 04:14 PM |
| Goichberg, Schultz, Channing should resign and Marinello should be Pres again | Ray Gordon | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 0 | February 16th 06 04:14 PM |
| Goichberg, Schultz, Channing should resign and Marinello should be Pres again | Ray Gordon | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | February 16th 06 04:14 PM |
| Marinello Case: Reply Affidavit to Order to Show Cause | Sam Sloan | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 13 | May 4th 05 09:21 PM |