How painful it must be for a man in his 40's to find himself alone in a
small apartment in a cold city. Your only friends or emotional support
coming from faceless strangers feinging interest in a desperate attempt
to say"love me" as is reflected in your own actions. It is indeed a
terrible burden to know that you will live out your days , alone and
unloved to perish a bitter old man with a legacy worth naught and a
passing most unremarkable.
I pity you your wretched life.




Ah and your abilities as a troll wain as well HisTrollian. wrong
information and wrong newsgroup.
For an article about a competent parodist, I recommend:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvAaR1E6CDA

On Oct 21, 6:22 pm, "The Historian" wrote:
Taylor Kingston wrote:
On Oct 21, 4:53 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
"Taylor Kingston" wrote in
Quite. When I called Rob's post a bad parody, I was not aware that he
had used this "Dialectizer" program to produce it. I would think, then,
that his reproduction of Brennen's article was a copyright violation,
even though its wording was slightly altered.
A similar instance was Goran Tomic's unauthorized use of Serbian
translations of copyrighted ChessCafe articles, including some of mine,
for his web-site a few years ago.

Taylor Kingston //of cource// omits to mention that Tomic said that
the
materials were not native to Chesscafe, and were themselves a breach
of
copyright by the same means he then describes below.

Utter nonsense (what else from our Phil?).

Agreed. His legal crankery is almost as much fun as his nutty theories
about language.

Tomic lifted, among other
things, some of *_my_* articles, to which *_I personally_* hold the
copyright, without so much as a "by your leave." No notice, no
requesting permission, no nothing. It was outright clandestine theft.
Period.

Did you expect Innes to do anything other than grant Tomic a pass?

Of course not. Our Phil even soft-pedals Tomic's worship of Stalin
and his latter-day imitators such as Milosevic.

Rob wrote:


How painful it must be for a man in his 40's to find himself alone in a
small apartment in a cold city. Your only friends or emotional support
coming from faceless strangers feinging interest in a desperate
attempt
to say"love me" as is reflected in your own actions. It is indeed a
terrible burden to know that you will live out your days , alone and
unloved to perish a bitter old man with a legacy worth naught and a
passing most unremarkable.
I pity you your wretched life.
Ah and your abilities as a troll wain as well HisTrollian. wrong
information and wrong newsgroup.
For an article about a competent parodist, I recommend:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvAaR1E6CDA










Pardon me :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvAaR1E6CDA

_
"... I prefer to discuss issues of chess. ..." - Rob Mitchell
(25 Sep 2006 20:17:16 -0700) (26 Sep 2006 15:05:51 -0700)
(26 Sep 2006 17:47:26 -0700) (27 Sep 2006 10:48:47 -0700)
(29 Sep 2006 15:31:25 -0700) (29 Sep 2006 21:53:52 -0700)
(29 Sep 2006 21:55:14 -0700)

_
"... I prefer to discuss issues of chess. ..." - Rob Mitchell
(25 Sep 2006 20:17:16 -0700) (26 Sep 2006 15:05:51 -0700)
(26 Sep 2006 17:47:26 -0700) (27 Sep 2006 10:48:47 -0700)
(29 Sep 2006 15:31:25 -0700) (29 Sep 2006 21:53:52 -0700)
(29 Sep 2006 21:55:14 -0700)
_
(The other material in the note was not necessarily the same
from one note to the next.)

Louis Blair wrote:
_
"... I prefer to discuss issues of chess. ..." - Rob Mitchell

Pardon me :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvAaR1E6CDA

Louis Blair wrote:
_
"... I prefer to discuss issues of chess. ..." - Rob Mitchell
(25 Sep 2006 20:17:16 -0700) (26 Sep 2006 15:05:51 -0700)
(26 Sep 2006 17:47:26 -0700) (27 Sep 2006 10:48:47 -0700)
(29 Sep 2006 15:31:25 -0700) (29 Sep 2006 21:53:52 -0700)
(29 Sep 2006 21:55:14 -0700)
_
(The other material in the note was not necessarily the same
from one note to the next.)

Typical. Mitchell and his leader Innes demand others write about chess,
a topic they themselves rarely discuss. What was that about fascists?

Taylor Kingston wrote:
A very crude, inept, childish attempt at parody. Rob, did you get
Hilbert's and Brennen's permission to reproduce this here? If not, you
may be guilty of copyright violation

That Mitchell violated my copyright, as well as that of The Campbell
Report and Dr. Hilbert, is an established fact; even that legal beagle,
err, eagle Mr. Innes agrees. The question I have is how to address it.
Musicians, like other creative artists, usually have strong feelings on
copyright. I can't imagine they take kindly to thieves. After all, if
Mitchell can steal a chess article, why wouldn't he steal lyrics or
music?

Rob wrote:
How painful it must be for a man in his 40's to find himself alone in a
small apartment in a cold city. Your only friends or emotional support
coming from faceless strangers feinging interest in a desperate attempt
to say"love me" as is reflected in your own actions. It is indeed a
terrible burden to know that you will live out your days , alone and
unloved to perish a bitter old man with a legacy worth naught and a
passing most unremarkable.
I pity you your wretched life.




Ah and your abilities as a troll wain as well HisTrollian. wrong
information and wrong newsgroup.
For an article about a competent parodist, I recommend:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvAaR1E6CDA

Lazy, Rob.

Your attempts to apostrophize Neil Brennen are getting tiresome and
very Repa-esque. Repeating the same montage over and over are making
you look stupid. Come up with some new material. If you can't come up
with something original, better to simply ignore him.

This maxim can be found in the RGCP Flame Code, article 1001.3D,
paragraph 3(c): "Indolent republications of personal invective has
been proven ineffective due to its inherent banality and serves only to
weaken one's argument in ad hominem correspondence. Use of this tactic
is highly discouraged."

Matt Nemmers wrote:
Lazy, Rob.

Your attempts to apostrophize Neil Brennen are getting tiresome and
very Repa-esque. Repeating the same montage over and over are making
you look stupid.

I wonder if the monomania is a side effect of the antidepressant
medication that Mr. Mitchell brags of taking?

Come up with some new material.

I don't think he's capable of doing so. It appears all he can do is
copy; copy Phil Innes' posting style, copy and illegally republish
chess articles....

If you can't come up
with something original, better to simply ignore him.

This maxim can be found in the RGCP Flame Code, article 1001.3D,
paragraph 3(c): "Indolent republications of personal invective has
been proven ineffective due to its inherent banality and serves only to
weaken one's argument in ad hominem correspondence. Use of this tactic
is highly discouraged."

Very nice, Matt!