Matt Nemmers wrote:
Rob wrote:
How painful it must be for a man in his 40's to find himself alone in a
small apartment in a cold city. Your only friends or emotional support
coming from faceless strangers feinging interest in a desperate attempt
to say"love me" as is reflected in your own actions. It is indeed a
terrible burden to know that you will live out your days , alone and
unloved to perish a bitter old man with a legacy worth naught and a
passing most unremarkable.
I pity you your wretched life.




Ah and your abilities as a troll wain as well HisTrollian. wrong
information and wrong newsgroup.
For an article about a competent parodist, I recommend:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvAaR1E6CDA


Good one Matt.

I indeed tire of the largess of Brennen/ troll. He appears in a video
playing chess and then begs to be placed on a ethics committee of a
group he has just joined! So sad. Neil is in my estimation the BIGGEST
example of a chess fascist there is. He is a whiny momma's boy. He is
the supreme troll on the internet even exceeding others whose exploites
were legendary but now pale by comparison to his trolling of me.

What a loser.
Lazy, Rob.

Your attempts to apostrophize Neil Brennen are getting tiresome and
very Repa-esque. Repeating the same montage over and over are making
you look stupid. Come up with some new material. If you can't come up
with something original, better to simply ignore him.

This maxim can be found in the RGCP Flame Code, article 1001.3D,
paragraph 3(c): "Indolent republications of personal invective has
been proven ineffective due to its inherent banality and serves only to
weaken one's argument in ad hominem correspondence. Use of this tactic
is highly discouraged."

The Historian wrote:
Taylor Kingston wrote:
A very crude, inept, childish attempt at parody. Rob, did you get
Hilbert's and Brennen's permission to reproduce this here? If not, you
may be guilty of copyright violation

That Mitchell violated my copyright, as well as that of The Campbell
Report and Dr. Hilbert, is an established fact; even that legal beagle,
err, eagle Mr. Innes agrees. The question I have is how to address it.
Musicians, like other creative artists, usually have strong feelings on
copyright. I can't imagine they take kindly to thieves. After all, if
Mitchell can steal a chess article, why wouldn't he steal lyrics or
music?

Or cheat his insurance policyholders?

Post copied for archival purposes.

Rob wrote:
The Historian wrote:
The Historian wrote:
Taylor Kingston wrote:
A very crude, inept, childish attempt at parody. Rob, did you get
Hilbert's and Brennen's permission to reproduce this here?

He did not. I can speak for Dr. Hilbert on this matter.

If not, you
may be guilty of copyright violation

He is.

I am requesting Mr. Mitchell remove my copyrighted material, and Dr.
Hilbert's as well, from the newsgroups. Mr. Mitchell's unauthorized
use of my copyrighted material clearly violates the US Copyright Code:

"Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this
title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the
following:

(1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords;

(2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;"

The only evidence of anything is within the body of Taylor Kingstons
post. He will have to remove that. My post should no longer exist.
Taylor, Mr Brennen has requested the material be removed. I have done
my part. To allow it to exist within the body of your post places you
in violation as well.

The Historian wrote:
Post copied for archival purposes.

Rob wrote:
The Historian wrote:
The Historian wrote:
Taylor Kingston wrote:
A very crude, inept, childish attempt at parody. Rob, did you get
Hilbert's and Brennen's permission to reproduce this here?

He did not. I can speak for Dr. Hilbert on this matter.

If not, you
may be guilty of copyright violation

He is.

I am requesting Mr. Mitchell remove my copyrighted material, and Dr.
Hilbert's as well, from the newsgroups. Mr. Mitchell's unauthorized
use of my copyrighted material clearly violates the US Copyright Code:

"Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this
title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the
following:

(1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords;

(2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;"

The only evidence of anything is within the body of Taylor Kingstons
post. He will have to remove that. My post should no longer exist.
Taylor, Mr Brennen has requested the material be removed. I have done
my part. To allow it to exist within the body of your post places you
in violation as well.

Post logged and archived for legal purposes.
Remove libel's immediatly. You are gulty of libel and your intent is to
damage my reputaion and ability to do business in a field unrelated to
any topic of discussion. This is your only warning.

"An untruthful statement about a person, published in writing or
through broadcast media, that injures the person's reputation or
standing in the community. Because libel is a tort (a civil wrong),
the injured person can bring a lawsuit against the person who made the
false statement. Libel is a form of defamation , as is slander (an
untruthful statement that is spoken, but not published in writing or
broadcast through the media)."

Delete and retract your postings.

Mr.Neil Brennen
chessnews @ mindspring.com
439 E. Marshall St. #4
Norristown, PA, 19401.

Rob wrote:
The Historian wrote:
Post copied for archival purposes.

Rob wrote:
The Historian wrote:
The Historian wrote:
Taylor Kingston wrote:
A very crude, inept, childish attempt at parody. Rob, did you get
Hilbert's and Brennen's permission to reproduce this here?

He did not. I can speak for Dr. Hilbert on this matter.

If not, you
may be guilty of copyright violation

He is.

I am requesting Mr. Mitchell remove my copyrighted material, and Dr.
Hilbert's as well, from the newsgroups. Mr. Mitchell's unauthorized
use of my copyrighted material clearly violates the US Copyright Code:

"Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this
title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the
following:

(1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords;

(2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;"

The only evidence of anything is within the body of Taylor Kingstons
post. He will have to remove that. My post should no longer exist.
Taylor, Mr Brennen has requested the material be removed. I have done
my part. To allow it to exist within the body of your post places you
in violation as well.

Post logged and archived for legal purposes.
Remove libel's immediatly. You are gulty of libel and your intent is to
damage my reputaion and ability to do business in a field unrelated to
any topic of discussion. This is your only warning.

"An untruthful statement about a person, published in writing or
through broadcast media, that injures the person's reputation or
standing in the community. Because libel is a tort (a civil wrong),
the injured person can bring a lawsuit against the person who made the
false statement. Libel is a form of defamation , as is slander (an
untruthful statement that is spoken, but not published in writing or
broadcast through the media)."

A little reflection, Mr. Mitchell, might show you to have considerable
exposure in this area.

Rob wrote:
Matt Nemmers wrote:

I indeed tire of the largess of Brennen/ troll. He appears in a video
playing chess...

Mr. Mitchell is spreading a false statement. I have never appeared in
film or on television.

The Historian wrote:
Rob wrote:
Matt Nemmers wrote:

I indeed tire of the largess of Brennen/ troll. He appears in a video
playing chess...

Mr. Mitchell is spreading a false statement. I have never appeared in
film or on television.

I did not originate this. I mearly reprinted it form an earlier post
which you did not comment upon. If it is not you, then I stand
corrected and I am happy to learn it was not you. It is NOT Neil
Brennen who stars in "Chubby Chess" It is someone else.

Rob

The Historian wrote:
The question I have is how to address it.
Musicians, like other creative artists, usually have strong feelings on
copyright. I can't imagine they take kindly to thieves. After all, if
Mitchell can steal a chess article, why wouldn't he steal lyrics or
music?

Or cheat his insurance policyholders?

My apologies to Mr. Mitchell for these postings. While he did indeed
violate my copyright, as well as that of Dr. Hilbert, it was
inappropriate for me to suggest that contacting his business associates
was an avenue worth exploring.

"Taylor Kingston" wrote in message
oups.com...


On Oct 21, 4:53 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
"Taylor Kingston" wrote in Quite. When I
called Rob's post a bad parody, I was not aware that he
had used this "Dialectizer" program to produce it. I would think, then,
that his reproduction of Brennen's article was a copyright violation,
even though its wording was slightly altered.
A similar instance was Goran Tomic's unauthorized use of Serbian
translations of copyrighted ChessCafe articles, including some of mine,
for his web-site a few years ago.

Taylor Kingston //of cource// omits to mention that Tomic said that the
materials were not native to Chesscafe, and were themselves a breach of
copyright by the same means he then describes below.

Utter nonsense (what else from our Phil?).

Nonsense? Kingston is getting so old he can't remember. But its not his
fault!

Tomic lifted, among other
things, some of *_my_* articles, to which *_I personally_* hold the
copyright, without so much as a "by your leave." No notice, no
requesting permission, no nothing. It was outright clandestine theft.
Period.

What has that to do with what I said? HE said chesscafe took materials that
they did not have copyright to. I don't know either the extent nor the
verity of that statement - what I wrote that he said it. It is not nonsense.
Its true.

What else can we expect from Darth Vaguer but exasperations and not exactly
the whole truth and not exactly in response to what anyone said?

I do not know if your personal copyright was also abrogated, nor if that was
all or some or none of the material to which he referred - but Taylor
Kingston might be pleased to note that that is not what I wrote!

I said, 'he claimed...'.

Please make a note of it.

Phil Innes


Taylor Kingston

"The Historian" wrote in message
ups.com...

Taylor Kingston wrote:
A very crude, inept, childish attempt at parody. Rob, did you get
Hilbert's and Brennen's permission to reproduce this here? If not, you
may be guilty of copyright violation

That Mitchell violated my copyright, as well as that of The Campbell
Report and Dr. Hilbert, is an established fact; even that legal beagle,
err, eagle Mr. Innes agrees.

What?

The question I have is how to address it.
Musicians, like other creative artists, usually have strong feelings on
copyright. I can't imagine they take kindly to thieves. After all, if
Mitchell can steal a chess article, why wouldn't he steal lyrics or
music?

Having accused me of murder at Taylor Kingston's direct suggestion - what
lesser thing should be ignored?

That these libels go unchallenged either at PJA, from Campbell, or by
Vaguely Krooning here, is utterly beside the point that Mitchell FIRST said
that Brennan misappropriated material from Chessville - did not provide
proper attribution, to the point that this was some double standard of
Brennan's own mind, as such.

Which Brennan now complains? The abuser or the would-be-abused?

It would be a most interesting suit for Brennan to appeal, since his worth
as a journalist must be in the tens of dollars, and meanwhile here is his
open libel of stealing music to contrast with it. Of course, if he did not
have that intent in his writing he could (a) learn to write, and (b) retract
it with an apology.

Brennan is over-encouraged by his friends if that is an appropriate term for
fellow misanthropes, and now knows no limits to what he can suggest about
other people. Of course, this CJA [laugh!] also ran [laugh!!] he is as thick
as two planks, and senses nothing.

Phil Innes