How nice that people would speculate about how I would do in a job I
never was given a chance to even interview for (nor was any other man).


Ray, what does this mean about class action. You must have a licence to
pratice law.

I can move the court to certify it as a class-action, and if I get that,
an attorney can be found.

If you even make the motion, you go directly to jail for UPL.

Like when I moved the court in the Penn case for the same thing?

(Hint: I moved simultaneously for appointed counsel).

Talk about UPL: "Teddybear" is the one who just engaged in it.


--
Money is not "game."
Looks are not "game."
Social status or value is not "game."
Those are the things that game makes unnecessary.

A seduction guru who teaches you that looks, money or status is game is not
teaching you "game," but how to be an AFC. He uses his students' money to
get women and laughs that "AFCs pay my rent."

"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" wrote in message
om...
The charge was filed November 2, 2006.

Since that time, I have received an e-mail from another male with very
impressive qualifications who stated that he would also have applied for
the web content editor position had he known it was available.

I do intend to file this as a class action when the time comes.

How are you going to do that, Clarence Darrow? You cannot represent
anyone other than yourself. You have not forgotten that you lack a
license to practice law?

Title VII provides for appointed counsel (42 USC 2000e-5(f)(1)) in some
cases, and the class wouldn't exist until it was certified, at which point
an attorney can be appointed or retained.


Let me get this straight....you guys are sueing over a job opening that you
didn't know about?......lol. Hell Microsoft has had alot of job opening that
they didn't email me about about.....guess I better sue.


BN

Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" wrote:
The charge was filed November 2, 2006.

Since that time, I have received an e-mail from another male with very
impressive qualifications who stated that he would also have applied for
the web content editor position had he known it was available.

I do intend to file this as a class action when the time comes.

How are you going to do that, Clarence Darrow? You cannot represent
anyone other than yourself. You have not forgotten that you lack a
license to practice law?

Title VII provides for appointed counsel (42 USC 2000e-5(f)(1)) in some
cases, and the class wouldn't exist until it was certified, at which point
an attorney can be appointed or retained.

True, for SOME cases - however, you are NOT in court yet.

You are in an exploratory phase with the EEOC, which may, or may very
well NOT decide to file action. And if the EEOC decides to file suit,
THEY will handle the litigation. FOR you. Because that is what they
DO. As any paralegal, or EEOC litigant, would know.

However, EEOC usually tries to work out other means of solution, first.

They are also very slow to move, as they tend to be VERY thorough.

Been there, done that, learned it the hard way.

Lee Darrow, C.H.
http://www.leedarrow.com

'd be nice =
us.legal

"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" wrote in message
om...
The charge was filed November 2, 2006.

Since that time, I have received an e-mail from another male with very
impressive qualifications who stated that he would also have applied for
the web content editor position had he known it was available.

I do intend to file this as a class action when the time comes.

How are you going to do that, Clarence Darrow? You cannot represent
anyone other than yourself. You have not forgotten that you lack a
license to practice law?

Title VII provides for appointed counsel (42 USC 2000e-5(f)(1)) in some
cases, and the class wouldn't exist until it was certified, at which point
an attorney can be appointed or retained.

The moment to apply to the Court for class action status you are in UPL and
subject to arrest, sanctions, and civil fines. Solicitation by an
unlicensed party is UPL.

"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" wrote in message
...
How nice that people would speculate about how I would do in a job I
never was given a chance to even interview for (nor was any other man).


Ray, what does this mean about class action. You must have a licence to
pratice law.

I can move the court to certify it as a class-action, and if I get that,
an attorney can be found.

If you even make the motion, you go directly to jail for UPL.

Like when I moved the court in the Penn case for the same thing?

(Hint: I moved simultaneously for appointed counsel).

Talk about UPL: "Teddybear" is the one who just engaged in it.

You don't have the legal credentials to make that statement. I'm not the
one that ran around trying to put a legal practice together, in direct
violation of the rule of ethics of the bar association, and spouted off
about WeSueOnTheNet4U. That's UPL, direct violation. Read up on it
sometime....

"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" wrote in
om:

The charge was filed November 2, 2006.

Since that time, I have received an e-mail from another male with
very impressive qualifications who stated that he would also have
applied for the web content editor position had he known it was
available.

I do intend to file this as a class action when the time comes.

How are you going to do that, Clarence Darrow? You cannot represent
anyone other than yourself. You have not forgotten that you lack a
license to practice law?

Title VII provides for appointed counsel (42 USC 2000e-5(f)(1)) in
some cases, and the class wouldn't exist until it was certified, at
which point an attorney can be appointed or retained.



you're a loser who is not a lawyer, gordy baybee...
learn to accept it...

even judges have told you you don't know **** about the law... well, they
said it nicer but that IS what they said...

--
Krustavus Teofilus Olfard



------------------
Everything I post is my opinion. If you don't like my opinions then
killfile me, if you have the balls.

However, EEOC usually tries to work out other means of solution, first.

They are also very slow to move, as they tend to be VERY thorough.

I can file suit after 180 days have passed, within 90 more days after that.


--
Money is not "game."
Looks are not "game."
Social status or value is not "game."
Those are the things that game makes unnecessary.

A seduction guru who teaches you that looks, money or status is game is not
teaching you "game," but how to be an AFC. He uses his students' money to
get women and laughs that "AFCs pay my rent."

Teddybear Loveable and Cuddly wrote:
"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" wrote in message
...
Ray,

If you got the job, you would last abot 5 minutes, and get fired for
insorbination. If you got the job, dude, Sam Sloan is your boss.

How nice that people would speculate about how I would do in a job I never
was given a chance to even interview for (nor was any other man).


Ray, what does this mean about class action. You must have a licence to
pratice law.

I can move the court to certify it as a class-action, and if I get that,
an attorney can be found.

If you even make the motion, you go directly to jail for UPL. You are not
now, nor have you ever been, an attorney. You did not go to law school, you
did not graduate from College, in fact there is no record of you even
attending college. You have an income of less than eight thousand bucks a
year, or so you stated to the Court when you filed IFP to avoid paying the
fees. There is no way you can do this, so quit puffing up. You are 0-11 in
your kooksuits, and the laughing stock of the Philadelphia legal community.
You can't even write a pleading that the Court can understand.

You are the Court Jester, but please, my computer can't take anymore, I'm
down two keyboards already.

Do I have standing to file a Unlicenced Pratice of Law complaint
against Gordon in Philidephia as a resident of Florida?

I beleive he is acting as an attorney trying to solicit clients without
a licence. Certainly, the defendant's counsel initiate a complaint with
your local bar authorities. His own posts make his complaint a sham.

Gordon is not a good faith pro se litigant.

Marcus Roberts

Teddybear Loveable and Cuddly wrote:
"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" wrote in message
...
Ray,

If you got the job, you would last abot 5 minutes, and get fired for
insorbination. If you got the job, dude, Sam Sloan is your boss.

How nice that people would speculate about how I would do in a job I never
was given a chance to even interview for (nor was any other man).


Ray, what does this mean about class action. You must have a licence to
pratice law.

I can move the court to certify it as a class-action, and if I get that,
an attorney can be found.

If you even make the motion, you go directly to jail for UPL. You are not
now, nor have you ever been, an attorney. You did not go to law school, you
did not graduate from College, in fact there is no record of you even
attending college. You have an income of less than eight thousand bucks a
year, or so you stated to the Court when you filed IFP to avoid paying the
fees. There is no way you can do this, so quit puffing up. You are 0-11 in
your kooksuits, and the laughing stock of the Philadelphia legal community.
You can't even write a pleading that the Court can understand.

You are the Court Jester, but please, my computer can't take anymore, I'm
down two keyboards already.