![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: fabrications, forum, issues, post, quotfive, recordquot, sam, single, sloan, uscf |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
chrisfalter 12754009
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 108 PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:53 pm Post subject: Five Sam Sloan Fabrications in a Single Post! (New record?) Reply with quote Sloan hijacked a thread on USCF / scholastic relations by a 6 sentence post that contained five stunning fabrications. That's a very high falsehood density, by whatever standard you measure. I am creating this thread so that those who wish to comment on Sloan's veracity or lack thereof, including Sloan, can do so here. This will allow the other thread to remain productive, members willing. Sloan's original post: samsloan wrote: Susan Polgar has never been to school a day in her life. She has no academic qualifications. As far as I am aware, she has never taught a regular chess class in a school. She has also never organized or directed a scholastic chess event. Nevertheless, she has often suggested that the scholastic chess community break away from the USCF and form a new organization under her leadership. So far, the scholastic chess leaders around the country are not buying it. Sam Sloan The three fabrications, and their refutations, are as follows: Sloan Fabrication #1. Polgar "has never taught a regular chess class in a school." The refutation: ChessPromotion wrote: Susan .... does teach in various schools in New York and other states and she does teach in the classroom as part of the curriculum as well as after school programs. She has done this on and off for about 10 years. It is amazing to me that board members can flat out lie and nothing is done about it. So much for professionalism and doing things for the best interest of chess! Sloan Fabrication #2. Polgar "has never organized ... a chess tournament" (as opposed to directing a tournament, a distinction which Sloan recognizes by talking about organizing or directing). The refutation: ChessPromotion wrote: ueschessmom wrote: Regarding Susan Polgar, Sam Sloan states: "She has also never organized or directed a scholastic chess event." .... Susan has monthly scholastic tournaments (that is to say, they are attended by school-aged players) at her club and has organized numerous tournaments for scholastic players around the country, including an upcoming tournament in Texas and the Tri-State Scholastic Chess Challenge held in New York City this fall. If there is a distinction, those of us with chess-playing kids don't see it. Thank you for pointing out the facts. May I also add something else? Susan also does organize and hold scholastic tournaments in the gymnasiums and cafeterias in the schools that she teaches in. Sloan Fabrication #3. Polgar "has often suggested that the scholastic chess community break away from the USCF and form a new organization under her leadership." And its refutation: SteveTN wrote: SteveTN wrote: samsloan wrote: Nevertheless, she has often suggested that the scholastic chess community break away from the USCF and form a new organization under her leadership. Do you have a cite for this assertion? Sloan, are you ignoring this question? Is the assertion you made truth or lie? Not for the first time, Sloan has chosen to mount a defense by completely ignoring the refutations offered by his critics, and instead defending a single point that no one has disputed: samsloan wrote: If you look her up on MSA, you will see that Susan Polgar is not a certified scholastic director and that she has never organized or directed a chess tournament. http://www.uschess.org/msa/MbrDtlTnmtDir.php?12452240 How do you propose to prove that my statement is false? Sam Sloan Of course, no one ever tried to refute Sloan by claiming that Polgar has ever directed a USCF-rated event. Unbelievably, Sloan thinks that offering this factoid somehow redeems his entire original post. I think any open-minded reader would disagree. _________________ Chris Falter Last edited by chrisfalter 12754009 on Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:16 pm; edited 2 times in total Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website ChessPromotion 12123950 Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 379 Location: Forest Hills, NY PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:19 pm Post subject: Three Sam Sloan Fabrications in a Single Post! (New reco Reply with quote chrisfalter wrote: Sloan hijacked a thread on USCF / scholastic relations by a 6 sentence post that contained three stunning fabrications. That's a very high falsehood density, by whatever standard you measure. I am creating this thread so that those who wish to comment on Sloan's veracity or lack thereof, including Sloan, can continue it here. This will allow the other thread to remain productive, members willing. Sloan's original post: samsloan wrote: Susan Polgar has never been to school a day in her life. She has no academic qualifications. As far as I am aware, she has never taught a regular chess class in a school. She has also never organized or directed a scholastic chess event. Nevertheless, she has often suggested that the scholastic chess community break away from the USCF and form a new organization under her leadership. So far, the scholastic chess leaders around the country are not buying it. Sam Sloan The three fabrications, and their refutations, are as follows: Sloan Fabrication #1. Polgar "has never taught a regular chess class in a school." The refutation: ChessPromotion wrote: Susan .... does teach in various schools in New York and other states and she does teach in the classroom as part of the curriculum as well as after school programs. She has done this on and off for about 10 years. It is amazing to me that board members can flat out lie and nothing is done about it. So much for professionalism and doing things for the best interest of chess! Sloan Fabrication #2. Polgar "has never organized ... a chess tournament" (as opposed to directing a tournament, a distinction which Sloan recognizes by talking about "organizing or directing"). The refutation: ChessPromotion wrote: ueschessmom wrote: Regarding Susan Polgar, Sam Sloan states: "She has also never organized or directed a scholastic chess event." .... Susan has monthly scholastic tournaments (that is to say, they are attended by school-aged players) at her club and has organized numerous tournaments for scholastic players around the country, including an upcoming tournament in Texas and the Tri-State Scholastic Chess Challenge held in New York City this fall. If there is a distinction, those of us with chess-playing kids don't see it. Thank you for pointing out the facts. May I also add something else? Susan also does organize and hold scholastic tournaments in the gymnasiums and cafeterias in the schools that she teaches in. Sloan Fabrication #3. Polgar "has often suggested that the scholastic chess community break away from the USCF and form a new organization under her leadership." And its refutation: SteveTN wrote: SteveTN wrote: samsloan wrote: Nevertheless, she has often suggested that the scholastic chess community break away from the USCF and form a new organization under her leadership. Do you have a cite for this assertion? Sloan, are you ignoring this question? Is the assertion you made truth or lie? Not for the first time, Sloan has chosen to mount a defense by completely ignoring the refutations offered by his critics, and instead defending a single point that no one has disputed: samsloan wrote: If you look her up on MSA, you will see that Susan Polgar is not a certified scholastic director and that she has never organized or directed a chess tournament. http://www.uschess.org/msa/MbrDtlTnmtDir.php?12452240 How do you propose to prove that my statement is false? Sam Sloan Of course, no one ever tried to refute Sloan by claiming that Polgar has ever directed a USCF-rated event. Unbelievably, Sloan thinks that offering this factoid somehow redeems his entire original post. I think any open-minded reader would disagree. Actually, there are at least 6 lies: Susan did try school but it was her parents' decision to homeschool her. Her academic level was more advance than children of the same age. She graduated from the very famous Academy of Physical Sports and Education in Minsk (same university with Gelfand, Smirin and Shulman, etc.) She was trying to keep many of the people in scholastic from bolting and running their own non-USCF activities. She worked very hard to convince various scholastic people to give the USCF a chance until at least the next election. You got the rest. To make it less confusing, I actually marked the various lies in the original post above in bold letters. Thank you for pointing the outrageous lies by board members. Best regards, PT _________________ Time to clean up the USCF! Back to top View user's profile Send private message Send email Visit poster's website artichoke 10167825 Joined: 13 Jul 2006 Posts: 971 Location: Connecticut PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:23 pm Post subject: Three Sam Sloan Fabrications in a Single Post! (New reco Reply with quote ChessPromotion wrote: .... She was trying to keep many of the people in scholastic from bolting and running their own non-USCF activities. She worked very hard to convince various scholastic people to give the USCF a chance until at least the next election. ... So was it you who was threatening to bolt, while she was trying to patch things up and keep the scholastic people within USCF? I sure remember one of you talking about being unable to tolerate being in USCF if Sloan took his seat on the EB. Back to top View user's profile Send private message jacklemoine 10509327 Joined: 11 Dec 2006 Posts: 247 Location: Atlanta, GA PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:28 pm Post subject: Reply with quote Payback: Sometimes I just can't resist: samsloan wrote: jacklemoine wrote: Susan has posted on her blog today a most serious statement that deserves the widest possible attention. She asserts that 1) scholastics are deeply disenchanted with the USCF; 2) they are ready to split off from the USCF; 3) the election of SS brought the matter to a crisis point; and 4) the problem is much worse than people realize. If many, if not most. scholastics are ready to walk, and if this would mean the end of the USCF, then I don't see what could be worse. My question: are things really this bad? I have looked at Susan's Blog and I cannot find the statement that you claim that she made. Where is it? Probably you are reading something she wrote at the time of my election in July, 2006 when she was predicting a big exodus as a result of my election. Her predictions have proven false. Scholastic membership has increased by five thousand kids since I was elected, due, of course, to my good looks and charming personality. Sam Sloan As some fool once wrote, some people should read more and write less. Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website chrisfalter 12754009 Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 108 PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:15 pm Post subject: Reply with quote I have updated the original post in this thread to acknowledge 2 other fabrications pointed out by Paul Truong: Sloan Fabrication #4: Polgar has never been to school a day in her life. Sloan Fabrication #5: Polgar has no academic qualifications. And their refutation: ChessPromotion wrote: Susan did try school but it was her parents' decision to homeschool her. Her academic level was more advance than children of the same age. She graduated from the very famous Academy of Physical Sports and Education in Minsk (same university with Gelfand, Smirin and Shulman, etc.) While one would grant to a stranger or an acquaintance the occasional misunderstanding, Sloan has claimed a deep involvement with Polgar at a time when she would have just completed her studies at the Academy of Physical Sports and Education in Minsk. Having made such a claim, Sloan would look very foolish to claim lack of familiarity with Susan's personal history. Truong suggests that "scholastic leaders are not buying it" is a 6th fabrication, but I regard it as part and parcel of fabrication #3 (Polgar allegedly has a history of openly calling on scholastic organizers to follow her into a new organization). My difference with PT is purely semantic, of course; in substance we agree completely. _________________ Chris Falter Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website samsloan 11115292 Joined: 08 Mar 2004 Posts: 1002 Location: Bronx, New York PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: Reply with quote I am aware that Susan Polgar briefly attended the Academy of Physical Sports and Education in Minsk, USSR as an adult some years after I was involved with her. This is apparently a sports school with a program in chess. As to what degree or diploma she may have obtained, I do not know. However, she could not have been there for very long. As to the claim by Paul Truong above that Susan wanted to go to school but her parents would not allow her, I have never heard that one before. Susan Polgar does not have a high school diploma, nor does she have any basic schooling in such subjects as math and science. The questing is whether a person lacking in basic education can read a balance sheet and income statement or even knows what one is. Can such a person serve effectively on the Executive Board, where budgetary and financial considerations are of paramount importance? Sam Sloan Back to top View user's profile Send private message Send email Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger jacklemoine 10509327 Joined: 11 Dec 2006 Posts: 247 Location: Atlanta, GA PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:31 pm Post subject: Reply with quote I really swore I'd lay off SS after I learned he has no meaningful position on any of the issues, but sometimes something comes along which is just too good to ignore. Such as the below: samsloan wrote: Susan Polgar does not have a high school diploma, nor does she have any basic schooling in such subjects as math and science. The questing is whether a person lacking in basic education can read a balance sheet and income statement or even knows what one is. Can such a person serve effectively on the Executive Board, where budgetary and financial considerations are of paramount importance? Sam Sloan This from the guy who not even 2 months ago posted in these very forums that in a list of transactions, he didn't know that "CRJ" stood for "Cash Receipts Journal"! Also, Susan doesn't need to know what a "balance sheet" is or an "income statement", either - because the USCF doesn't have any. As a non-profit entity, the USCF has a "Statement of Financial Position" and a "Statement of Activity". Sloan's statement makes me think of him working at a McDonalds and not knowing the difference between a cheeseburger and a chicken McNuggets. Maybe Sloan is just a few french fries short of a happy meal! Okay, I'm being bad, I know. I really do want to see less personal attacks, I really do. But you've got to help me out, Sam. You've just got to stop making yourself such a target. A man can only stand just so much temptation! I'm only human! And stop with the Freudian slips, already! Like the "The questing is whether a person lacking in basic education . . ." from your quote above. You've got to purge my deathless prose from your poor brain, Sam. Read Shakespeare, instead. Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Ezri 13485492 Joined: 17 Aug 2006 Posts: 43 PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:36 pm Post subject: Reply with quote If there was a television show about Sam Sloan, with the supporters and the anti-supporters; it would be between the televisions shows like "The case for the existence of UFO's"; and, "In search of the lost city of Atlantis." Back to top View user's profile Send private message ueschessmom 13470792 Joined: 22 Jul 2006 Posts: 11 PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:55 pm Post subject: Reply with quote Where to begin with this one? First, the high school diploma. Guess what? Richard Branson doesn't have one either and doesn't seem to have hampered his ability to run a business. (By the way, I'm not even sure that this statement is true.) Second, the claim that Susan lacks "any basic schooling in such subjects as math and science" doesn't bear up under even mild scrutiny. I think it's well known that her parents were teachers by training and that they hired tutors for math and science. Third, Susan has been running her own business for years. As the previous poster noted, Mr. Sloan makes it too easy. But really, are people allowed to just make up facts from thin air and post them on this forum? Back to top View user's profile Send private message Moogy 12662345 Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 20 PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:00 pm Post subject: Reply with quote samsloan wrote: ISusan Polgar does not have a high school diploma, nor does she have any basic schooling in such subjects as math and science. The questing is whether a person lacking in basic education can read a balance sheet and income statement or even knows what one is. Sam Sloan IMPORTANT DISTINCTION: Schooling DOES NOT EQUAL education! "I do not let school interfere with my education." (attributed to Mark Twain, but I have not verified that he was the wise one who made this statement) Brenda Homeschooling parent (now retired since my own very well EDUCATED son is graduating from college in May and going to medical school next fall) Back to top View user's profile Send private message ueschessmom 13470792 Joined: 22 Jul 2006 Posts: 11 PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:03 pm Post subject: Reply with quote Brenda: Thank you for making that point. I meant to include it in my post but forgot. Congratulations about your son, ueschessmom Back to top View user's profile Send private message Terry_Vibbert 13076592 Joined: 20 Mar 2006 Posts: 102 Location: Evansville, IN PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:06 am Post subject: Reply with quote Moogy wrote: samsloan wrote: ISusan Polgar does not have a high school diploma, nor does she have any basic schooling in such subjects as math and science. The questing is whether a person lacking in basic education can read a balance sheet and income statement or even knows what one is. Sam Sloan IMPORTANT DISTINCTION: Schooling DOES NOT EQUAL education! "I do not let school interfere with my education." (attributed to Mark Twain, but I have not verified that he was the wise one who made this statement) Brenda Homeschooling parent (now retired since my own very well EDUCATED son is graduating from college in May and going to medical school next fall) Congrats! Way to go Brenda! You could not be more correct. Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website chrisfalter 12754009 Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 108 PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:10 pm Post subject: Reply with quote samsloan wrote: I am aware that Susan Polgar briefly attended the Academy of Physical Sports and Education in Minsk, USSR as an adult some years after I was involved with her. It would seem like that would actually provide highly relevant academic qualifications for teaching chess, don't you think? If you knew that she had attended that institution, Sam, why did you write the following: samsloan wrote: Susan Polgar ... has no academic qualifications. And if you knew that, why did you write the following: samsloan wrote: Susan Polgar has never been to school a day in her life. You made 5 fabrications, Sam, and there is still no good explanation. Then to state that Polgar knows nothing about science and math, just because she did not attend traditional school...? I have organized (and coach) a homeschooling chess club, and I can assure you that every single one of the homeschool students is very capable in both subjects. Not only have you unjustly oppugned Susan, Sam, but you have also oppugned a sizeable portion of the scholastic chess community. Sigh... Finally, I invite readers to carefully examine the following 2 Sam Sloan quotes: samsloan wrote: The questing is whether a person lacking in basic education can read a balance sheet and income statement or even knows what one is. Note the spelling of the second word, which I emphasized. samsloan wrote: jacklemoine wrote: samsloan wrote: jacklemoine wrote: BTW, I note that Susan, in addition to her claimed inferior education and teaching skills does not have problems with elementary spelling and grammar. She's not a native English speaker, either! How do you know this? Because she's Hungarian. Duh! I mean, how do you know that she "does not have problems with elementary spelling and grammar". Note that Sloan put the quotation mark before the period, instead of after the period. So who's struggling with elementary spelling and grammar? I hope the thread doesn't descend into a comparison of candidates' facility with the English language, however. That would be truly absurd. I'm sure that if anyone looks hard enough, they will find a generous supply of faux pas in the writings of any of the 10 candidates. I'm sure I'm not immune to the occasional slip, either. The reason I'm addressing the subject at all is that, IMHO, it is worth noting that a candidate who has occasional difficulties with spelling and grammar is stooping to criticize the spelling and grammar of one of the other candidates. That's not a good way to lead an organization. _________________ Chris Falter Back to top View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website chrisfalter 12754009 Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 108 PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:01 pm Post subject: Reply with quote For those who are interested in homeschooling and chess (and this includes Mr. Sloan), please note that Matt Hoekstra, one of the top boards for the Carolina Cobras in the US Chess League, was homeschooled in the Charlotte, NC area. He is a FIDE Master and is USCF-rated 2401. He currently attends Duke University. I think he knows a little about science and math Exclamation _________________ Chris Falter |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Answer by Sam Sloan to Ethics Complaint by Grant Perks | samsloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | January 27th 07 02:54 PM |
| Grant Perks Ethics Complaint against Sam Sloan | samsloan | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 0 | January 27th 07 10:13 AM |
| A recent Sloan post on the USCF Issues Forum | politikalhack@gmail.com | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 3 | December 22nd 06 12:30 PM |
| Marinello Case: Reply Affidavit to Order to Show Cause | Sam Sloan | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 13 | May 4th 05 09:21 PM |
| Marinello Case: Affidavit in Support of Order to Show Cause | samhsloan@yahoo.com | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 6 | March 4th 05 04:53 AM |