Deleted from uschess.org/forums by the Moderator

Use my real name and have perverts like you stalking me?
No thanks. Now go away bitter little TROLL.


"Ambassador" wrote in message
oups.com...

You were thrown out of a nudist colony for sucking your dick in
public. This is a true story. Why chess freak, after being expelled
from a nudsit colony and convicted of a misdemanor for sucking your
dick in front of a child, do you post here without your real name?

I wonder?

Marcus Roberts

KUDOS TO SAM SLOAN

The moderator at uschess.org/forums has gone nuts today,
deleting numerous postings by myself, Joel Channing and Joe
Lux. Here is one of my postings that was deleted by the
moderator: -- Sam Sloan

The overwhelming balance of what Sam writes
below belongs first and foremost on the USCF censored
forum. It is one of Sam's strongest efforts, though I
think the business about Susan Polgar playing in some
young girl's tournament can probably be explained by
her getting the year wrong. Or simply a lapse of
memory over a quarter century and countless tournaments.

Now, then, I find Susan Polgar's expenses not
to be out of line, though she has to understand that
once she is on the Executive Board, then much must
change. The point, though, is that Sam is absolutely
right to publicize these issues and expenses, even
when my conclusions about their import may not be the
same as his own.

I begin to believe that along with Tom Dorsch
and Jim Eade, Sam is one of the finest Board members
ever to serve the USCF. His energy, his dedication to
openness, his evident CARING for the promotion of
chess in the United States -- the man is doing a fine
job on the Board.


wrote:
The subject matter below, directly relevant to Sam Sloan's fitness to
serve as a fiduciary of a national nonprofit organization, was also
deleted from the USCF Issues Forum, and is therefore on topic.

:-)

If one visits samsloan.com, one will see prominent ads for a book
first published in 1968, _Sex Marchers_; co-authored by Jefferson
Poland and Sloan himself. http://www.samsloan.com/sexmarchers.htm

1. This book, sold by Sloan even today, endorses a platform of sexual
emancipation for children. An excerpt is cited below:

http://www.sterneck.net/cybertribe/s...ague/index.php

[A sexually free human being] goes naked most of the time, except
when there is some
positive reason (not shame or modesty or fear) to dress up. "Clothes
are bandages for sick bodies", says Tuli Kupferberg. I believe nudism
is fundamental and necessary prerequisite for sexual freedom. Clothes
commonly build barriers of sexual fear and hostility. We learn
"Don't look" when we are still too young to comprehend "Don't
****". Each adult needs to spend several years living in a nude
society, in order to overcome the bad effects of our shame-filled
childhoods. And our children should be completely spared the morbid
sickness of hiding their beautiful bodies like some sort of carrion
deemed too foul for the light of day .

The problem is not advocacy of naturism, but the advocacy of naturism
*for children in the context of a manifesto for sexual freedom*.

2. Poland was convicted by the State of California of having molested
an eight-year-old girl.

http://tinyurl.com/2qfvs2 I encourage the reader to click on the tabs
"Offenses" and "Known Aliases."

3. Poland has admitted that he "fondled the girl's vulva and
occasionally performed cunnilingus on her."

http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/Nudi...Clitlick2.html

http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/Nudi.../Clitlick.html

4. In 2006, Sam Sloan used Wikipedia as a platform to offer two
separate apologias for his former colleague Poland.

In Excerpt 1 below, Sloan accuses the child's parents of being
"obviously complici[t]" in the molestation. Even granting the
hypothetical, how would the parents' complicity be exculpatory?

In the contradictory Excerpt 2, Sloan accuses the child's parents of
themselves "abusing the child."

Sloan presents no evidence for the parent's complicity in Poland's
molestation or for his claim that the parents themselves abused the
daughter. Poland's curious choice of surname (as documented on the
California Megan's Law site) would tend to suggest otherwise.

EXCERPT 1:

The author of the following passage from an earlier version of the
Wikipedia article on Jefferson Poland was http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
User:Sam_Sloan

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...oldid=41759835

In the early 1980s, Poland was charged with child molestation.
Apparently, a nudist couple, including David Irving and his
girlfriend,
had entrusted Poland with the care of their daughter while they were
nude sunbathing on Black's Beach in La Jolla, California near San
Diego. Some time later, the nudist couple accused Poland of having
performed cunnalingus [sic--WHB] on their daughter while they were
nude
sunbathing. Poland fled the country rather than face these charges. He
lived for five years as a fugitive in Australia until 1988, when he
was
extradited back to America. In view of the passage of time and the
obvious complicity of his accusers, Poland probably could have
successfully fought the charges. However, by that time he had changed
his name legally to "Clitlick" and he preferred to plead guilty to the
cunnalingus [sic--WHB] charge. He served about nine months in San
Diego
County Jail. Upon his release, he returned to live in San Francisco.
He
turned over his archives to the Bancroft Library of the University of
California at Berkeley, where they are now available for public
viewing
by academic researchers. Poland now lives in San Francisco, where he
is
monitored as a registered sex offender.

END EXCERPT 1

EXCERPT 2

On the Wikipedia talk page for the article on Jefferson Poland,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sam_Sloan (Sam Sloan)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...did=463352 07
wrote:

I have not seen or spoken to Jefferson Poland since 1967. However,
based on what I have read, I strongly suspect that he was the victim
of
a setup. In the years I knew him, I never saw him express any interest
in children. I never even saw him express much interest in adult
woman,
except that he had a girlfriend, Holly Tannen, who followed him around
like a little puppy-dog everywhere he went.

Those were the glory days of sexual freedom. There was always a bevy
of
naked hippie chicks laying around with their legs spread open waiting
for some guy to come along. I partook of these opportunities
frequently, but I never saw Jefferson have sex with a woman, although
there were plenty of available women around.

My guess is that the nudist couple were themselves abusing the child.
Then, they left the child briefly in the care of Jefferson, so that
they could come back and accuse him of what they had actually done. If
the San Diego prosecutor really had proof that Jefferson was guilty,
he
would not have let him off with only nine months in jail. Sam Sloan
16:38, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Talk:Jefferson_Poland" (This passage has since been removed by
Wikipedia administrators.)

END EXCERPT 2

5. Given Sloan's interest in, and self-reported practice of, sexual
relations with minors, why is he still serving on the board of the
United States Chess Federation? Has the USCF's legal counsel been
presented with this evidence?

A. By Sloan's own account, he had a "seamy" and "not entirely
Platonic" relationship with Susan Polgar when she was 17 (a minor
under Hungarian and U.S. law) and he was in his early 40s; by Polgar's
account, Sloan sexually propositioned her at age 16.

B. Sloan boasts of a "dalliance" with a Burmese prostitute of "junior
high school age."

http://web.archive.org/web/200508282...om/burmese.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/200508291...m/burmese2.htm

Sloan here confirms that he had sexual relations with the minor:

http://web.archive.org/web/200605030...m/girlsgot.htm

C. Sloan hosts soft porn marketed to children on his website (e.g.,
http://www.shamema.com/pokeplot.htm the cartoon character is twelve
years old) and admits his libidinal interest in the child characters
http://tinyurl.com/2oskjb .

Toss Sloan out now. Let him sue. No court will ever hold a man who
has never made a habit of supporting his own children to be a fit
fiduciary for thousands of children.

On Feb 15, 7:35 am, " wrote:
KUDOS TO SAM SLOAN


Now, then, I find Susan Polgar's expenses not
to be out of line, though she has to understand that
once she is on the Executive Board, then much must
change. The point, though, is that Sam is absolutely
right to publicize these issues and expenses, even
when my conclusions about their import may not be the
same as his own.

Kudos to Susan Polgar, who emailed the original invoice to me back in
2003, when I first posted it--er, "publicize[d] these issues and
expenses"--on this forum.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.g...b02f1fd?hl=en&

So Larry, who wrote _Sex Marchers_?