![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: did, lose |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
i played the following games in an open tournament over the weekend.
i've been reading those silman books: white: me (1307) black: 2004 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. g3 d6 5. Bg2 Bxc3 6. bxc3 f5 7. d3 Nf6 8. Qe2 O-O 9. O-O fxe4 10. dxe4 Bg4 11. Qc4+ Kh8 12. Rb1 Rb8 13. Be3 Qe7 14. Rb2 Be6 15. Qd3 h6 16. Nh4 Kh7 17. Rfb1 b6 18. Nf5 Qd7 19. Nh4 Ng4 20. f3 Nxe3 21. Qxe3 Na5 22. Bf1 g5 23. Ng2 Qf7 24. a3 Qxf3 25. Qxf3 Rxf3 26. Bd3 Rbf8 27. Rb4 c5 28. R4b2 Bh3 29. Re1 c4 30. Be2 Rxc3 31. Ra2 Bxg2 32. Kxg2 Nc6 33. Bd1 Nd4 34. a4 Nc6 35. Bg4 a5 36. Bf5+ Kg7 37. Re2 Nb4 38. Rb2 Ra3 39. Rd2 Rd8 {White resigns} 0-1 white: me (1307) black: 2125 1. e4 c6 2. Nf3 d5 3. Nc3 Bg4 4. h3 Bxf3 5. Qxf3 e6 6. exd5 cxd5 7. Bb5+ Nc6 8. d4 Bd6 9. Qg4 Qf6 10. Be3 Ne7 11. O-O-O O-O 12. Qe2 Nf5 13. g4 Nfxd4 14. Bxd4 Nxd4 15. Rxd4 Qxd4 16. Bd3 e5 17. f3 Bb4 18. Nb5 Qf4+ 19. Kb1 a6 20. Nc3 Bxc3 21. bxc3 Rac8 22. h4 Rxc3 23. g5 Rfc8 24. h5 Qxg5 25. Qf2 h6 26. Rg1 Qxh5 27. Qe3 g6 28. Kb2 Kg7 29. Qe1 b5 30. Rh1 Qxf3 31. Rf1 Qh5 32. Be2 Rxc2+ 33. Kb1 Qxe2 {White resigns} 0-1 white: 2101 black: me (1307) 1. e4 d6 2. d4 Nf6 3. Nc3 g6 4. Bc4 Bg7 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Qe2 c6 7. Bb3 Bg4 8. h3 Bxf3 9. Qxf3 e5 10. dxe5 dxe5 11. Be3 Nbd7 12. O-O Kh8 13. Rad1 Qe7 14. Bg5 h6 15. Bh4 g5 16. Bg3 Rad8 17. Qe3 b6 18. f3 Nh5 19. Bh2 f5 20. exf5 Rxf5 21. g4 Rf4 22. gxh5 Rh4 23. Kg2 Rxh5 24. Ne4 Nf6 25. Rxd8+ Qxd8 26. Qd3 Qxd3 27. cxd3 Nxe4 28. fxe4 Rh4 29. Rf5 g4 30. hxg4 Rxg4+ 31. Kf3 Rh4 32. Bxe5 Rh3+ 33. Ke2 Bxe5 34. Rxe5 Rh2+ 35. Ke3 Rxb2 36. Re8+ Kg7 37. e5 a5 38. e6 Kf6 39. Rf8+ Ke7 40. Rf7+ Ke8 41. Rb7 b5 42. e7 a4 43. Bd1 Rxa2 44. Bh5# {Black checkmated} 1-0 |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
What a lovely topic :-)
1C. I watched this expert several times. Perhaps I payed him also before the game in the middle of which I had a clear advantage, perhaps a won position. I never saw him doing anything on the chess board. And still, he was close to becoming a master. When I asked him about his style he said: I don't have any, I just push the wood and wait for the other guy to screw up. And that's what I did. There was a lull in the action, I didn't know what to do, and within a couple of moves it was him who had advantage. He won again. *** 3. To avoid too much of masochism let me mention how I won a game agaiinst fairly strong opponent in the recent days. I felt that I was better, ahead in development, and I had a bishop on b7 against his knight. Fortunately I was not satisfied with my abstract advantage but somehow stopped to think strategically. I found a way to get rid of central pawns and in the open position I won quickly and painlessly (for me, I don't know about the opponent). Wow! 4. Back to masochism. Just before a dental appointment I played two 7m games on Internet against a decent player but he was not too strong and had lower than me rating. I won the first game alright and had a clear advantage in the second game. There was one file open, we each had Q+R+B of the same color, his pawns were locked on the bishop color. I pressed an attack, made the position dangerous for both of us, then after not paying enough attention to his attack I got checkmated. I left for the dentis with the impression that I overlooked his decisive move but otherwise I was suppossed to win (his king was a step from a disaster). After the dentist appointment, with the inner components of my face in much better shape I finally got the real reason why I lost. My attacking his king was a strategical error!!! I could feel it during the game. I had no confidence making my attack, I felt uneasy about it, but at the time I didn't see any other way to win the game. So, I won it for my opponent. Instead of attacking his king, I should get my heavy artillery on the single existing open file. That would force the exchange of the Q+R or else I would control the file and the game. After the exchange, I would have easy time in the ending. That's were my advantage really was. Well, now I am a better strategist :-) Regards, Wlod I was thinking later about that game. My conclusion was that there came a moment in the game, after I have achieved quite a bit, when it was like in the opening again, I had to develop my pieces. It didn't matter that age wise, after 20 or so moves, it was an advanced middle game. There was nothing better to do than simply develope my pieces again. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| why did i lose? | Zero | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 10 | May 9th 07 09:51 PM |
| Why you lose at chess | Dr. Dave Regis (remove NO_SPAM) | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 5 | February 20th 07 09:58 AM |
| Who would win? Which one will lose? | Ray Gordon | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 5 | January 27th 06 04:15 PM |
| Who would win? Which one will lose? | Ray Gordon | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 5 | January 27th 06 04:15 PM |
| Who would win? Which one will lose? | Ray Gordon | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 5 | January 27th 06 04:15 PM |