A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , ,

One of my Proposals to make the USCF Profitable Again



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 25th 07, 04:02 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
samsloan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,798
Default One of my Proposals to make the USCF Profitable Again

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Aronowitz
To Sam Sloan: I've never heard of anyone
in Canada objecting to my tournaments being USCF-rated. Here's a
project for you. If you could find a way to convince the various
major organizations to harmonize their rating systems so that one
player does not have separate ratings from USCF, CFC, FQE, and CMA, it
would be a benefit for chess in North America.
My proposal, which I have advocated for 30 years long before I became
a member of the board, is to make the USCF rating system international
by first rating a few high level tournaments including the Olympiads
which would give every top level player in the world a USCF rating and
then invite other countries to have their events USCF rated upon
payment of applicable fees.

I have presented my proposals to the board several times and each time
they have been voted down.

If I am re-elected, I will present my proposal again and again and
again until I finally find a board that agrees to it, because I
consider this to be the most important step to expanding and improving
the USCF and to get us to start making money again.

It is hard to imagine this when we have long money for ten of the last
12 years and have lost $2 million over all, but one must think about
it and realize that the reason we were able to lose $2 million and
still stay in business is that we had $2 million to lose, because the
USCF was highly profitable at one time, before the Goichberg-Gang took
control in 1996.

Sam Sloan

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Goichberg's List samsloan rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) 2 March 19th 07 07:25 PM
Answer by Sam Sloan to Ethics Complaint by Grant Perks samsloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 0 January 27th 07 02:54 PM
Ernie Schlich brings on Four Controversies, part 3 Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 2 April 28th 06 11:17 PM
Ernie Schlich brings on Four Controversies, part 3 Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 2 April 28th 06 11:17 PM
Reply to Affidavit of Leroy Dubeck Sam Sloan alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) 26 March 29th 05 04:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Personal Car Finance - Credit Cards - Cheat Codes - Mortgage - Loans