A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , ,

Polgar and Truong REPEATEDLY take financial advantage of USCF



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 2nd 07, 08:01 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
Internal Bleach
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default Polgar and Truong REPEATEDLY take financial advantage of USCF

(reprised)

Over the last several months, I have repeatedly warned this Executive Board,
and I have copied you, about the dangers of USCF working with Susan Polgar
and Paul Truong.

These two individuals are constantly trying to rip us off, and they have
often succeeded. For example, the highly unusual five-year, $30,000
contract Susan Polgar was given to write for Chess Life. There are many
other examples. We used to have an Executive Director, Frank Niro, who
connived to benefit Polgar and Truong at USCF's expense, but I thought we
had solved that problem.

To my personal knowledge, Susan Polgar has threatened, since August 2003:

--To sue USCF EB President Beatriz Marinello.

--To sue USCF EB Vice President of Finance Tim Hanke.

--To sue USCF Finance Committee Chair Stan Booz.

And I have just learned today, that Susan Polgar has now told us SHE WILL
SUE THE USCF, if the USCF EB does not vote by April 1, 2004, to change the
U.S. Women's Olympiad Team selection rules to please Susan Polgar and make
sure Anna Hahn does not play on the team.

Oh, and I also heard today, Susan Polgar is also threatening to sue Erik
Anderson of America's Foundation for Chess! (I have no idea why.)

Despite these many problems, I understand that USCF Events Coordinator Diane
Reese has recently hired Susan Polgar to appear at EVERY upcoming USCF
national scholastic event, for how much money and how many years I don't
know; and you personally have signed a contract to this effect--despite the
Executive Board's specifically stated desire to avoid any such arrangement
with Susan Polgar, clearly expressed at the last Executive Board meeting in
Boca Raton, Florida, where you were present and involved in the discussion!

I'm speechless. Do you not get it? Does the USCF EB not get it? What will it
take, for everyone to understand that we should avoid Polgar and Truong
like the plague?

Polgar and Truong REPEATEDLY take financial advantage of USCF.

Polgar and Truong REPEATEDLY threaten us with lawsuits.

In response to Polgar and Truong's threats, we REPEATEDLY cave in like a
house of cards.

Despite their well-established unsavory character, we REPEATEDLY write large
checks to Polgar and Truong.

I can only conclude that the Executive Director and Executive Board have
learned nothing, and we are collectively guilty of gross stupidity. Do you
have another explanation?

Tim Hanke

USCF Vice President of Finance

Ads
  #2  
Old August 2nd 07, 08:11 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
Rob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,112
Default Fake Sloan is real Sloan

Way to go Sam! gave yourself away!


On Aug 2, 2:01 pm, Internal Bleach wrote:
(reprised)




  #3  
Old August 2nd 07, 09:00 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
Mike Murray
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,416
Default Fake Sloan is real Sloan

On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:11:30 -0700, Rob wrote:

Way to go Sam! gave yourself away!


On Aug 2, 2:01 pm, Internal Bleach wrote:
(reprised)


How does somebody posting one of Hanke's letters indicate that Sloan
the fake Sloan are one and the same???
  #4  
Old August 3rd 07, 03:28 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
Rob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,112
Default Fake Sloan is real Sloan

On Aug 2, 3:00 pm, Mike Murray wrote:
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:11:30 -0700, Rob wrote:
Way to go Sam! gave yourself away!


On Aug 2, 2:01 pm, Internal Bleach wrote:
(reprised)


How does somebody posting one of Hanke's letters indicate that Sloan
the fake Sloan are one and the same???


well,
it is someone who has an obsessive compulsion to attack them. SOmeone
who has an overinflated opinion of themself. Who come to mind?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Goichberg's List samsloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 3 March 19th 07 09:09 PM
Goichberg's List samsloan rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) 1 March 19th 07 09:09 PM
Goichberg's List samsloan rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) 2 March 19th 07 07:25 PM
Goichberg's List samsloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 2 March 19th 07 07:25 PM
Goichberg's List samsloan alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) 0 March 19th 07 07:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Compare - Remortgages - Remortgages - Magazine Subscriptions - Mortgages