On Aug 30, 9:43 pm, samsloan wrote:
On Aug 30, 4:36 pm, Rob wrote:

On Aug 30, 1:19 pm, "Paul Thomas, CPA"
Ever thought of forming the ACA? Or the USCA? Or the NACF? Or any other
combination of alphabets?

--
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia

Way to go Paul! You volunteering to be the treasurer/accountant/
auditor in residence for a new organization :-)
Rob(which-Mitch)

There have been many, many plans and efforts to start a rival
organization to the USCF. All have failed.



Rob(which-Mitch) is a non-chess-player

Really Sam? In the last six months I have played more rated games of
chess than you have in the last two years. They are simply NOT USCF
rated. SO ... hear you LIE and are wrong..

who dreams of starting another
rival organization,

I dont know why you would presume to know what I think of or about
anything? You sure as heck have no idea what I dream about.

Basically, you are a cownard. You are so into yourself that you can't
imagine that someone might be honest in playing online chess because
your dishonesty would compel you to cheat... so you project your inner
failings onto others.

You have been invited to chessworld.com to play. You have been and
acted as a coward and backed out. You who refuse to play should be
ashamed.

Mr. Bot is playing and is on the verge of getting a tournament
norm(congrats Mr. Bot)!

So play or don't. I will continue to give you that option. What you
will find is that all of the RGCP and RGCM team members do not cheat
as we love the game. You SLoan can love nothing but your own ego. You
are a huge waste of genetic material and should be recycled
immediatly.
Rob (Which- Mitch)

and thus he bothers us with nonsense-postings
every day.

He is safely ignored.

Sam Sloan

On Aug 31, 2:00 pm, Mike Murray wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:17:04 GMT, "Chess One"
wrote:

Recently the Sam Sloan impersonator has dissapeared, and we have also chased
off most other abusers by simply asking them to write on topic, any topic to
do with chess, rather than speculate about other posters as their constant
diet.

I doubt anybody chased them off.

I think they've gone because there's nothing much going on at the
moment, or perhaps they feel they've already realized their agenda.

I think he left because he got elected to the board.

Sam Sloan

"samsloan" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Aug 31, 2:00 pm, Mike Murray wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:17:04 GMT, "Chess One"
wrote:

Recently the Sam Sloan impersonator has dissapeared, and we have also
chased
off most other abusers by simply asking them to write on topic, any
topic to
do with chess, rather than speculate about other posters as their
constant
diet.

I doubt anybody chased them off.

I think they've gone because there's nothing much going on at the
moment, or perhaps they feel they've already realized their agenda.

I think he left because he got elected to the board.

you are a poor psychologist, sam sloan, the fake is posting here right now


there are some clues to the fake; he doesn't like women and he can't comment
on chess - the fake is a deep repressive who would like to comment on both
[!], or at least see what that is actually like, so he temporises here,
rather than doin either

but is scared to 'come out' since the fake is also deeply conservative,
inhibited, and afraid of life - you, definitely are not! ROFL, though you
oughta be! ROFL.

but this is NOT about you, or the fake, its about something else, its about
chess playing, not chess egos. or if you like, chess management as a
systemic practice and not chess egos, take your pick.

Phil Innes



Sam Sloan

On Aug 31, 1:19 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
Please notice that Phil Innes has only a provisional USCF rating,
meaning that he has only played 24 games or less, and the highest
rated player he has ever defeated in his life was rated 2060,

***actually 2199! if you want to play chess sloan just show up and stop
making such a *special* person of yourself! if you insult or provoke me or
my family i will smack you in your mouth very hard indeed. that is normal
here, as it is anywhere. just because you do this at a distance persuades
you that what you do is tolerable in person. it ain't - and if you provoke
it, pfft! is that fair to your mind?

if you want to play chess then we could play chess. i don't usually play
chess with abuseniks, so maybe it is YOU who are declining the opportunity
to play me - rather than talking big, as usual? how about them bananas?

in person i do assure you what you write at a distance is not ok or normal
here, and is considered provocative, and you /are/ a massive poseur at
other's expense, after all! - like someone really wanting to fight instead
of playing chess. but only wanting it at a distance. make up your own mind
which that is -since you picked the wrong person to pretend with - so come
on over or shut it. i am now calling you! okay?

if you ever dare to show up i'll let the people know that perhaps you
decided to play chess instead of playing your mouth organ.

i hope you notice that this is not really an invitation, and even if you
came i might not decide you are worth spending 10 minutes with, since you
are not *special* to me - it is a response to abuse which you offer at the
safe distance of some several hundred miles.

and remember miles!

stop pretending you want to play me at chess, since who actually would want
to voluntarily spend time with you, on these usual terms of engagement? i
can play stronger people anytime at all, and make no bones about losing to
them, opr triumphs either. whatever your game is is something else entirely,
nr. wormtongue

phil innes

non chess newsgroups excised

Sloan said:


There have been many, many plans and efforts to start a rival
organization to the USCF. All have failed.
Rob(which-Mitch) is a non-chess-player



Really Sam? In the last six months I have played more rated games
of
chess than you have in the last two years. They are simply NOT USCF
rated. SO ... hear you LIE and are wrong..


who dreams of starting another
rival organization,


I dont know why you would presume to know what I think of or about
anything? You sure as heck have no idea what I dream about.

Basically, you are a cownard. You are so into yourself that you can't
imagine that someone might be honest in playing online chess because
your dishonesty would compel you to cheat... so you project your
inner
failings onto others.


You have been invited to chessworld.com to play. You have been and
acted as a coward and backed out. You who refuse to play should be
ashamed.


Mr. Bot is playing and is on the verge of getting a tournament
norm(congrats Mr. Bot)!


So play or don't. I will continue to give you that option. What you
will find is that all of the RGCP and RGCM team members do not cheat
as we love the game. You Sloan can love nothing but your own ego. You
are a huge waste of genetic material and should be recycled
immediatly.

He won't play Phil Innes and he won't play me. He is a coward and a
joke.

Rob (Which- Mitch)

"Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...

Really Sam? In the last six months I have played more rated games of
chess than you have in the last two years. They are simply NOT USCF
rated. SO ... hear you LIE and are wrong..

you can't spell worth a shirt! Its lye, L Y E
as ani ful no

who dreams of starting another
rival organization,

I dont know why you would presume to know what I think of or about
anything? You sure as heck have no idea what I dream about.

strong words, 'heck', but at least Sam is returning to ground, our some
closwe hover over it, since he would now like to have a go at us ordinary
hobbits who pointed out enough stuff about his tenure to cause him not to
get re-elected

right?

why else should sam sloan dein to notice, we the people? we the players?

Basically, you are a cownard. You are so into yourself that you can't
imagine that someone might be honest in playing online chess because
your dishonesty would compel you to cheat... so you project your inner
failings onto others.

You have been invited to chessworld.com to play. You have been and
acted as a coward and backed out. You who refuse to play should be
ashamed.

Mr. Bot is playing and is on the verge of getting a tournament
norm(congrats Mr. Bot)!

and i laud him for it [fancy northern word, meaning, like lard? no? that
can't be it - but whatever, its better than before]

So play or don't. I will continue to give you that option. What you
will find is that all of the RGCP and RGCM team members do not cheat
as we love the game.

yes - say it loud! i have looked over ever game of our team [secretly] won
or lost, and i can't find the slightest trace of computer 'enhancement' not
even for our opponents!

You SLoan can love nothing but your own ego. You
are a huge waste of genetic material and should be recycled
immediatly.

hey - that's not fair. you are talking to Saul here, who...
he was distracted, Fischer-polarized
Polgarixed

damn! she hasn't written me a word since I called her 'Polgarhontas'
and i have to write to her husband

i maybe need to explain to em both that the gal brought two tribes together,
etc

Rob (Which- Mitch)

and thus he bothers us with nonsense-postings
every day.

He is safely ignored.

Sam Sloan

Sam Sloan has made an entire chess carear out of ignoring some things, while
suggestively writing of his connections - no matter how rebuffed they
actually turn out to be

But we here should welcome him back to ordinary chess life, if he dares,
since Sloan is really no different than anyone else, we all got effected by
contact with greats, and survived that to whatever extent - though all knew
its force. Sam is still a bit bewildered by Fischr and Polgar.

Sign the guy up! - and he can maybe get board 5 here after trying out a bit
? Then we can all be human together, not ignored! Rob.

Although I absolutely understand your sentiment [ROFL] since Sam Slaon does
actually love chess. That is his saving grace.

If we make a new team it should be called the Hobbits, or something,
something about we the people, we the players. Just us in all our frailty
and humanness.

Heuch! What a Sassenach dominated nonsence, that which proceeds by force
rather than intelligence!

Ach roimhe sin daione ag arach duinealachd...

Before this, says the old text in that language

people nurtured humanity:

they were warm-hearted,
determined,
and unshakable in supporting their friends;

were the shield of shelter
of the feeble;

high spirited, headstrong and hardy
in conquering their enemies.

Heuch! What is become of us? Is what we encounter the slightest shade of
what we Americans destroyed? Though nothing is lost, since so many
contributed here, and it is resilient of all our hope, deeper than these
shades, ay.

Cordially, Phil Innes

On Aug 31, 3:59 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

ups.com...

Really Sam? In the last six months I have played more rated games of
chess than you have in the last two years. They are simply NOT USCF
rated. SO ... hear you LIE and are wrong..

you can't spell worth a shirt! Its lye, L Y E
as ani ful no

who dreams of starting another
rival organization,

I dont know why you would presume to know what I think of or about
anything? You sure as heck have no idea what I dream about.

strong words, 'heck', but at least Sam is returning to ground, our some
closwe hover over it, since he would now like to have a go at us ordinary
hobbits who pointed out enough stuff about his tenure to cause him not to
get re-elected

right?

why else should sam sloan dein to notice, we the people? we the players?

Basically, you are a cownard. You are so into yourself that you can't
imagine that someone might be honest in playing online chess because
your dishonesty would compel you to cheat... so you project your inner
failings onto others.

You have been invited to chessworld.com to play. You have been and
acted as a coward and backed out. You who refuse to play should be
ashamed.

Mr. Bot is playing and is on the verge of getting a tournament
norm(congrats Mr. Bot)!

and i laud him for it [fancy northern word, meaning, like lard? no? that
can't be it - but whatever, its better than before]

So play or don't. I will continue to give you that option. What you
will find is that all of the RGCP and RGCM team members do not cheat
as we love the game.

yes - say it loud! i have looked over ever game of our team [secretly] won
or lost, and i can't find the slightest trace of computer 'enhancement' not
even for our opponents!

You SLoan can love nothing but your own ego. You
are a huge waste of genetic material and should be recycled
immediatly.

hey - that's not fair. you are talking to Saul here, who...
he was distracted, Fischer-polarized
Polgarixed

damn! she hasn't written me a word since I called her 'Polgarhontas'
and i have to write to her husband

i maybe need to explain to em both that the gal brought two tribes together,
etc

Rob (Which- Mitch)

and thus he bothers us with nonsense-postings
every day.

He is safely ignored.

Sam Sloan

Sam Sloan has made an entire chess carear out of ignoring some things, while
suggestively writing of his connections - no matter how rebuffed they
actually turn out to be

But we here should welcome him back to ordinary chess life, if he dares,
since Sloan is really no different than anyone else, we all got effected by
contact with greats, and survived that to whatever extent - though all knew
its force. Sam is still a bit bewildered by Fischr and Polgar.

Sign the guy up! - and he can maybe get board 5 here after trying out a bit
? Then we can all be human together, not ignored! Rob.

Although I absolutely understand your sentiment [ROFL] since Sam Slaon does
actually love chess. That is his saving grace.

If we make a new team it should be called the Hobbits, or something,
something about we the people, we the players. Just us in all our frailty
and humanness.

Heuch! What a Sassenach dominated nonsence, that which proceeds by force
rather than intelligence!

Ach roimhe sin daione ag arach duinealachd...

Before this, says the old text in that language

people nurtured humanity:

they were warm-hearted,
determined,
and unshakable in supporting their friends;

were the shield of shelter
of the feeble;

high spirited, headstrong and hardy
in conquering their enemies.

Heuch! What is become of us? Is what we encounter the slightest shade of
what we Americans destroyed? Though nothing is lost, since so many
contributed here, and it is resilient of all our hope, deeper than these
shades, ay.

Cordially, Phil Innes

shoot Phil, u right purty words. I kniw Sloan is ah liar cause he
ain't no lyre. know why? cause a lyre plays but a liar dont! :-)

Rob"Sam Wise" Mitchell