Here's an example of Innes using his fine ear for stylistic evidence
in identifying anonymous posters.

From humanities.lit.authors.shakespea

"seaker" wrote in message

oups.com...

Lynne - Who would those reasonable people be? Paul Crowley, KCL,
gangleri, Chess One, Art Neuendorffer, Elizabeth, Stephanie Caruana,
Mousie, Roger Stritmatter? I don't think so. Stick to kiddie books,
they probably don't tax your mind!

********
thanks neil, kiddie books are informing of the early mind, and early
learning is pyschologically so much more important than late, doncha
think?

phil
*******
I wrote:

I'm not "seaker"; Lynne .... addresses
"seaker" as "Robert", which is hardly a nickname for "Neil".

*********
Dr. David Webb wrote:

Nor is seaker's style remotely similar to yours, Neil.

And in a follow up post:

There is certainly no implied criticism of either of you, Neil; your
styles are just very different. However, many anti-Stratfordians seem
to be utterly tone-deaf to stylistic nuances, so perhaps Mr. Innes's
confusion is not surprising. Indeed, confusion seems to be his steady
state.

************
Sorry, Phil. I have been calling seaker Robert for ages. He is
definitely not Neil.

Regards,
Lynne

On Oct 10, 9:07 am, The Historian wrote:
Here's an example of Innes using his fine ear for stylistic evidence
in identifying anonymous posters.

From humanities.lit.authors.shakespea
"seaker" wrote in message

oups.com...

Lynne - Who would those reasonable people be? Paul Crowley, KCL,
gangleri, Chess One, Art Neuendorffer, Elizabeth, Stephanie Caruana,
Mousie, Roger Stritmatter? I don't think so. Stick to kiddie books,
they probably don't tax your mind!

********
thanks neil, kiddie books are informing of the early mind, and early
learning is pyschologically so much more important than late, doncha
think?

phil
*******

I wrote:

I'm not "seaker"; Lynne .... addresses
"seaker" as "Robert", which is hardly a nickname for "Neil".

*********

Dr. David Webb wrote:

Nor is seaker's style remotely similar to yours, Neil.

And in a follow up post:

There is certainly no implied criticism of either of you, Neil; your
styles are just very different. However, many anti-Stratfordians seem
to be utterly tone-deaf to stylistic nuances, so perhaps Mr. Innes's
confusion is not surprising. Indeed, confusion seems to be his steady
state.

************
Sorry, Phil. I have been calling seaker Robert for ages. He is
definitely not Neil.

Regards,
Lynne

***********
Another example, compiled by Dr. Louis Blair:

"Hey Dr 'Rynd' ...
_
... your ego appeared hereabouts declaring that
it had read all relevant material in English, but
when asked if it has read the Gulko manuscript
- snipped it in the response. ROFL. ..." - Phil
Innes (Sat, 05 Aug 2006 19:40:12 GMT)
_
_
"Phil, that was Larry Tapper, ..." - jamesrynd
(5 Aug 2006 22:48:36 -0700)
_
_
"... I extended Dr D an invitation ...
_
A specific on Soviet-era affairs was if he
had read the Gulko MSS, but in his
response he eliminated even the
question, while maintaining his superiority
over others by ..." - Phil Innes (Sun,
06 Aug 2006 12:03:14 GMT)
_
_
"... Have you admitted yet that all this started
because you posted your 'question/challenge
- whatever you want to call it' to the wrong
person? ..." - jamesrynd (6 Aug 2006
05:26:48 -0700)
_
_
"... I get confused with all the anons, especially
when they answer each other's mail wink and
sound so much alike.
_
If indeed Larry Tapper is the person who knows
everything, surely he or Dr Rynd, could address
the subject. ..." - Phil Innes (Sun, 06 Aug 2006
12:49:31 GMT)
_
_
"... How can anything remain on topic with your
constant ad hom attacks, which aren't even
directed at the right person? ..." - jamesrynd
(6 Aug 2006 06:33:05 -0700)
_
_
"... jamesrynd ...
...
Laugh - What I declined was to meet you! ..."
- Phil Innes (Mon, 07 Aug 2006 19:50:46 GMT)
_
_
"Phil this is really getting old. It is Larry Tapper,
... who offered to meet you at the chessboard,
and you provided him with the most impolite of
declinations ..." - jamesrynd (7 Aug 2006
13:43:56 -0700)
_
_
"... I had only asked [Rynd-Dowd] if his 'all'
included a certain Gulko manuscript, which
shall we presume he had not read, ..." - Phil
Innes (Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:58:39 GMT)
_
_
"Phil - I never made any statements regarding
the Gulko manuscript or Keres-Botvinnik. I
professed no expertise on the subject, and
even Larry Tapper did not use the term 'all.'
_
PLEASE STOP CONFUSING ME WITH
LARRY TAPPER. ..." - jamesrynd (7 Aug 2006
14:40:00 -0700)
_
_
"... I explained my confusion, confessed it, that
I could not tell, nor care to, one /agent/ from
l'autre! ..." - Phil Innes (Tue, 08 Aug 2006
20:39:49 GMT)
_
_
"... Since I seem to have accepted Dread
Dowd's challenge not for a few games but a
week of games, he himself backed off, and
has never made any contact - which is much
as I thought it would be. ..." - Phil Innes
(Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:15:16 GMT)
_
_
"... I never asked to play chess against [Phil
Innes], that was Larry Tapper. ..." - jamesrynd
(12 Aug 2006 09:46:27 -0700)
_
_
"... I actually responded to [Rynd-Dowd's]
initiative and accepted his challenge to play a
match, and extended it the whole week. ..."
- Phil Innes (Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:08:42 GMT)
_
_
"... Larry Tapper wanted to play chess with [Phil
Innes] ..." - jamesrynd (14 Aug 2006
07:16:52 -0700)
_
_
"... Phil, who gets easily confused about people
(e.g. Brady/Lawrence, Tapper/Dowd), ..."
- Taylor Kingston (20 Aug 2006 07:47:11 -0700)
_
_
"... [Taylor Kingston] is also not very attentive to
the now repeated joke, that this 'confusion' is
somewhat deliberated about people who all sound
the same - I only wrote this a few times - maybe
it'll take 6? ..." - Phil Innes (Sun, 20 Aug 2006
18:55:21 GMT)
_
_
"... Does Phil Innes want us to remember that he
thinks it is funny to publicly accuse people of
things that they did not do? ..." - Louis Blair
(21 Aug 2006 03:40:17 -0700)