![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: plays, thing |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
MOTHER: Tommy, somebody's been spraying graffiti all over the
neighborhood, and your sister Susie found these cans of spray paint in your dresser drawer. What do you have to say for yourself? TOMMY: Susie had no business snooping in my room. Why are you listening to a snoop? And she's already told a whole bunch of people about it! Why do you believe a gossip? Why don't you punish her? And remember, I've been taking the garbage out and mowing the lawn every week, and I made the honor role. MOTHER: Yes, Tommy, we're going to talk to her about that. And we appreciate all your good work. But in the meantime, let's take these cans out and see if they match the color of the dirty words written on Mister Brown's fence. TOMMY: I don't want to look at that fence. Susie's got a grudge against me, she's always hated me. Have you asked her why? Why don't you ask her why? Why hasn't she been punished? MOTHER: Let's just go out and take a look at Mister Brown's fence. TOMMY: I don't want to look at that fence. Anybody could have spray painted that fence. Anybody can buy spray paint. And why haven't you punished Susie for snooping in my room? Why are we talking about that fence when Susie snooped in my room? Maybe Susie put the spray paint in my drawer. How do you know she didn't? Can you prove she didn't? And remember when Susie tattled on that kid, Billy, in her 3rd grade class. She's a tattle-tale. Why are you listening to her anyway? You're not fair. MOTHER: Later, Tommy. To be fair, we'll have Mister Jones from the hardware store check the paint before we punish you, just to make sure I didn't make a mistake. [Mother goes out and inspects fence, they go back to Tommy's room ] MOTHER: Why, Tommy, there are seven colors in the graffiti, and they are the same seven colors on the cans we found in your drawer. And the handwriting looks like that stuff you wrote last year when you were practicing writing left-handed. TOMMY: It doesn't matter. Susie shouldn't have been snooping in my room. It shouldn't count. Why do you believe a tattle-tale anyway? And she told a whole bunch of people before she told you. How can you believe her when she gossiped? My diary was in that drawer. She might have read my diary. MOTHER: Diary? Let's have a look at that diary, buster. Why, Tommy, the exact words written on Mister Brown's fence are in your diary on page 7! TOMMY: Susie probably did it. She forged in my diary. You should spank her. Someone who'll snitch will do ANYTHING. And she was snooping. That proves she did it. Or maybe the milkman did it. Why would I write stuff like that? I'm an honor student. Ask that nice man, Mr. Innes. He's really smart, almost a chess IM. He'll help find out who really did it. I didn't do it. I'll devote my life to finding out who did it. Jeez. Now I know how O.J. must feel. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 11, 2:13 pm, Mike Murray wrote:
MOTHER: Tommy, somebody's been spraying graffiti all over the neighborhood, and your sister Susie found these cans of spray paint in your dresser drawer. What do you have to say for yourself? TOMMY: Susie had no business snooping in my room. Why are you listening to a snoop? And she's already told a whole bunch of people about it! Why do you believe a gossip? Why don't you punish her? And remember, I've been taking the garbage out and mowing the lawn every week, and I made the honor role. MOTHER: Yes, Tommy, we're going to talk to her about that. And we appreciate all your good work. But in the meantime, let's take these cans out and see if they match the color of the dirty words written on Mister Brown's fence. TOMMY: I don't want to look at that fence. Susie's got a grudge against me, she's always hated me. Have you asked her why? Why don't you ask her why? Why hasn't she been punished? MOTHER: Let's just go out and take a look at Mister Brown's fence. TOMMY: I don't want to look at that fence. Anybody could have spray painted that fence. Anybody can buy spray paint. And why haven't you punished Susie for snooping in my room? Why are we talking about that fence when Susie snooped in my room? Maybe Susie put the spray paint in my drawer. How do you know she didn't? Can you prove she didn't? And remember when Susie tattled on that kid, Billy, in her 3rd grade class. She's a tattle-tale. Why are you listening to her anyway? You're not fair. MOTHER: Later, Tommy. To be fair, we'll have Mister Jones from the hardware store check the paint before we punish you, just to make sure I didn't make a mistake. [Mother goes out and inspects fence, they go back to Tommy's room ] MOTHER: Why, Tommy, there are seven colors in the graffiti, and they are the same seven colors on the cans we found in your drawer. And the handwriting looks like that stuff you wrote last year when you were practicing writing left-handed. TOMMY: It doesn't matter. Susie shouldn't have been snooping in my room. It shouldn't count. Why do you believe a tattle-tale anyway? And she told a whole bunch of people before she told you. How can you believe her when she gossiped? My diary was in that drawer. She might have read my diary. MOTHER: Diary? Let's have a look at that diary, buster. Why, Tommy, the exact words written on Mister Brown's fence are in your diary on page 7! TOMMY: Susie probably did it. She forged in my diary. You should spank her. Someone who'll snitch will do ANYTHING. And she was snooping. That proves she did it. Or maybe the milkman did it. Why would I write stuff like that? I'm an honor student. Ask that nice man, Mr. Innes. He's really smart, almost a chess IM. He'll help find out who really did it. I didn't do it. I'll devote my life to finding out who did it. Jeez. Now I know how O.J. must feel. nice attempt Mike but a very poor analogy. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
NOT BEFORE THEN
When does Paul Truong have a case to answer in public or, failing that, when ought he be asked to resign from the Executive Board? If someone can provide a reasonable level of evidence that his fingers were on the offending keyboard(s), then the time has arrived for him to answer the case being made against him. If his answer is inadequate, then he should be asked to resign. Not before then. Yours, Larry Parr Rob wrote: On Oct 11, 2:13 pm, Mike Murray wrote: MOTHER: Tommy, somebody's been spraying graffiti all over the neighborhood, and your sister Susie found these cans of spray paint in your dresser drawer. What do you have to say for yourself? TOMMY: Susie had no business snooping in my room. Why are you listening to a snoop? And she's already told a whole bunch of people about it! Why do you believe a gossip? Why don't you punish her? And remember, I've been taking the garbage out and mowing the lawn every week, and I made the honor role. MOTHER: Yes, Tommy, we're going to talk to her about that. And we appreciate all your good work. But in the meantime, let's take these cans out and see if they match the color of the dirty words written on Mister Brown's fence. TOMMY: I don't want to look at that fence. Susie's got a grudge against me, she's always hated me. Have you asked her why? Why don't you ask her why? Why hasn't she been punished? MOTHER: Let's just go out and take a look at Mister Brown's fence. TOMMY: I don't want to look at that fence. Anybody could have spray painted that fence. Anybody can buy spray paint. And why haven't you punished Susie for snooping in my room? Why are we talking about that fence when Susie snooped in my room? Maybe Susie put the spray paint in my drawer. How do you know she didn't? Can you prove she didn't? And remember when Susie tattled on that kid, Billy, in her 3rd grade class. She's a tattle-tale. Why are you listening to her anyway? You're not fair. MOTHER: Later, Tommy. To be fair, we'll have Mister Jones from the hardware store check the paint before we punish you, just to make sure I didn't make a mistake. [Mother goes out and inspects fence, they go back to Tommy's room ] MOTHER: Why, Tommy, there are seven colors in the graffiti, and they are the same seven colors on the cans we found in your drawer. And the handwriting looks like that stuff you wrote last year when you were practicing writing left-handed. TOMMY: It doesn't matter. Susie shouldn't have been snooping in my room. It shouldn't count. Why do you believe a tattle-tale anyway? And she told a whole bunch of people before she told you. How can you believe her when she gossiped? My diary was in that drawer. She might have read my diary. MOTHER: Diary? Let's have a look at that diary, buster. Why, Tommy, the exact words written on Mister Brown's fence are in your diary on page 7! TOMMY: Susie probably did it. She forged in my diary. You should spank her. Someone who'll snitch will do ANYTHING. And she was snooping. That proves she did it. Or maybe the milkman did it. Why would I write stuff like that? I'm an honor student. Ask that nice man, Mr. Innes. He's really smart, almost a chess IM. He'll help find out who really did it. I didn't do it. I'll devote my life to finding out who did it. Jeez. Now I know how O.J. must feel. nice attempt Mike but a very poor analogy. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 11, 10:53 pm, " wrote:
NOT BEFORE THEN When does Paul Truong have a case to answer in public or, failing that, when ought he be asked to resign from the Executive Board? If someone can provide a reasonable level of evidence that his fingers were on the offending keyboard(s), then the time has arrived for him to answer the case being made against him. If his answer is inadequate, then he should be asked to resign. Not before then. Yours, Larry Parr Rob wrote: On Oct 11, 2:13 pm, Mike Murray wrote: MOTHER: Tommy, somebody's been spraying graffiti all over the neighborhood, and your sister Susie found these cans of spray paint in your dresser drawer. What do you have to say for yourself? TOMMY: Susie had no business snooping in my room. Why are you listening to a snoop? And she's already told a whole bunch of people about it! Why do you believe a gossip? Why don't you punish her? And remember, I've been taking the garbage out and mowing the lawn every week, and I made the honor role. MOTHER: Yes, Tommy, we're going to talk to her about that. And we appreciate all your good work. But in the meantime, let's take these cans out and see if they match the color of the dirty words written on Mister Brown's fence. TOMMY: I don't want to look at that fence. Susie's got a grudge against me, she's always hated me. Have you asked her why? Why don't you ask her why? Why hasn't she been punished? MOTHER: Let's just go out and take a look at Mister Brown's fence. TOMMY: I don't want to look at that fence. Anybody could have spray painted that fence. Anybody can buy spray paint. And why haven't you punished Susie for snooping in my room? Why are we talking about that fence when Susie snooped in my room? Maybe Susie put the spray paint in my drawer. How do you know she didn't? Can you prove she didn't? And remember when Susie tattled on that kid, Billy, in her 3rd grade class. She's a tattle-tale. Why are you listening to her anyway? You're not fair. MOTHER: Later, Tommy. To be fair, we'll have Mister Jones from the hardware store check the paint before we punish you, just to make sure I didn't make a mistake. [Mother goes out and inspects fence, they go back to Tommy's room ] MOTHER: Why, Tommy, there are seven colors in the graffiti, and they are the same seven colors on the cans we found in your drawer. And the handwriting looks like that stuff you wrote last year when you were practicing writing left-handed. TOMMY: It doesn't matter. Susie shouldn't have been snooping in my room. It shouldn't count. Why do you believe a tattle-tale anyway? And she told a whole bunch of people before she told you. How can you believe her when she gossiped? My diary was in that drawer. She might have read my diary. MOTHER: Diary? Let's have a look at that diary, buster. Why, Tommy, the exact words written on Mister Brown's fence are in your diary on page 7! TOMMY: Susie probably did it. She forged in my diary. You should spank her. Someone who'll snitch will do ANYTHING. And she was snooping. That proves she did it. Or maybe the milkman did it. Why would I write stuff like that? I'm an honor student. Ask that nice man, Mr. Innes. He's really smart, almost a chess IM. He'll help find out who really did it. I didn't do it. I'll devote my life to finding out who did it. Jeez. Now I know how O.J. must feel. nice attempt Mike but a very poor analogy. Well Said Larry |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:53:24 -0700, "
wrote: NOT BEFORE THEN When does Paul Truong have a case to answer in public or, failing that, when ought he be asked to resign from the Executive Board? If someone can provide a reasonable level of evidence that his fingers were on the offending keyboard(s), then the time has arrived for him to answer the case being made against him. If his answer is inadequate, then he should be asked to resign. Not before then. Yours, Larry Parr For the record, Larry, my little vignette was designed primarily to dramatize the rationalization and weaseling of those who seek to ignore, discredit or discount Mottershead's information BEFORE it has been evaluated by one or more independent credentialed experts. Our Experts should then forward their findings to those qualified to weigh the electronic evidence against other pertinent factors, i.e., to those qualified to judge. Acts II and III have yet to be written. Appropriate punishment if judged culpable? Not addressed. Maybe exposure is enough. Maybe a remonstration to go and sin no more. Maybe more. Not my department. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 12, 7:14 am, Mike Murray wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:53:24 -0700, " wrote: NOT BEFORE THEN When does Paul Truong have a case to answer in public or, failing that, when ought he be asked to resign from the Executive Board? If someone can provide a reasonable level of evidence that his fingers were on the offending keyboard(s), then the time has arrived for him to answer the case being made against him. If his answer is inadequate, then he should be asked to resign. Not before then. Yours, Larry Parr For the record, Larry, my little vignette was designed primarily to dramatize the rationalization and weaseling of those who seek to ignore, discredit or discount Mottershead's information BEFORE it has been evaluated by one or more independent credentialed experts. Our Experts should then forward their findings to those qualified to weigh the electronic evidence against other pertinent factors, i.e., to those qualified to judge. Acts II and III have yet to be written. Appropriate punishment if judged culpable? Not addressed. Maybe exposure is enough. Maybe a remonstration to go and sin no more. Maybe more. Not my department. Will you spend as much time vindicating the accused when he is vindicated as you do now to condemn him? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:20:58 -0700, Rob wrote:
Appropriate punishment if judged culpable? Not addressed. Maybe exposure is enough. Maybe a remonstration to go and sin no more. Maybe more. Not my department. Will you spend as much time vindicating the accused when he is vindicated as you do now to condemn him? You don't quite get it. I'm condemning spurious arguments on the part of those who oppose letting Motterhead's accusations play out. If, upon examination, the person Motterhead suspects is cleared of suspicion, what "vindication" would be left for me -- my opinion would be irrelevant, and vindication would not imply anything meritorious -- just that he didn't do it. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| now here's a cool thing | Chess One | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 1 | June 25th 06 10:22 AM |
| now here's a cool thing | Chess One | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 1 | June 25th 06 10:22 AM |
| Now Chess Game plays four Variations to beat opponent | Sanny | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 25 | December 2nd 05 02:52 PM |
| Now Chess Game plays four Variations to beat opponent | Sanny | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 1 | November 22nd 05 09:33 AM |
| Now Chess Game plays four Variations to beat opponent | Sanny | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | November 22nd 05 06:54 AM |