The biography of Ali Nihat Yazici has today been restored to Wikipedia
as a "stub".

So, I have today asked that the other three notable chess
personalities who were simultaneously "salted the earth" by the same
now-banned user be restored as well:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped...007_October_13

Here is what I wrote:

Thank you very much. Now, what can be done about the other three
biographies that were simultaneously "salted the earth" by
[[User:JzG]], who has since left Wikipedia? These are [[Julio César
Ingolotti]], [[Geoffrey Borg]] (AfD) and [[Panupand Vijjuprabha]] (AfD
- copyviol speedy). These were all "salted the earth" because, he
said, that there was a history of copyright violations by me. However,
this was not true. I was the original author of the original articles
about these four persons. At that time I was a member of the Executive
Board of Directors of the [[United States Chess Federation]] and these
four individuals here the official nominees of the [[USCF]] for
election to the Executive Board of [[FIDE]], the [[World Chess
Federation]]. These four were also the presidents of the chess
federations of their respective countries, Turkey, Paraguay, Malta,
and Thailand, thus easily making them sufficiently notable by the
standards of Wikipedia. The idea that I would copy the work of others
is nonsense as everybody knows that I write my own stuff. I do not
personally know any of these four men, but since we nominated them to
the top positions of FIDE, it was among my duties to write biographies
of these men and posting these biographies to various places around
the Internet. Thus, when [[User:JzG]] claimed that I was violating a
copyright, he was accusing me of copying my own work. In short, the
earth should be "unsalted" with respect to these four persons. ~~~~

Sam Sloan

On Oct 15, 8:06 am, samsloan wrote:

On Oct 14, 10:00 pm, [quoted the following passage authored by Mig Greengard]:


Sam Sloan, I want you to read this carefully because I don't often
shout and I would hate for this effort to go unnoticed. Your posting
here makes me feel like I just gargled with a cup of maggots. If you
continue to try to involve my name in your sleaze campaign, whether on
Wikipedia, here, or anywhere else, I will rain hell down on you until
the rats kick you out of your box because they can't stand the heat.
If you had the brains Darwin gave a titmouse you'd realize such
obvious and slimy campaigning has a disastrous effect on any legal
action. That is, other than what will doubtlessly be several cases
against you for slander and worse. If you have any case at all, which
I doubt, get on with it and shut up.

This is a very funny and surprising remark. For more than four years
BillBrockhas been attacking me at least ten times a day, calling me
a "child molester" and and various other names. He even recently
stated on Wikipedia that it is his "hobby" to attack me.

Now, he threatens me saying that he will "rain hell down" as though he
will do more than he has already done.

The first instance I can find ofBrockcalling me a "child molester"
was on August 6, 2003, under "Will Sam Sloan Sue?"

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.g.../msg/0664a1fbc...

So now that I actually have finally sued him after being called a
child molester by BillBrockhundreds of times over a period of four
years and now that the summons and complaint were apparently served on
him on Friday, he seems to be threatening me as to what he will do if
I do not drop the suit.

Sam Sloan

"[A]pparently served"? Either I was served, or I wasn't....

http://direkickfeud.blogspot.com/200...in-praxis.html

On Oct 18, 5:30 pm, wrote:
On Oct 15, 8:06 am, samsloan wrote:



On Oct 14, 10:00 pm, [quoted the following passage authored by Mig Greengard]:

Sam Sloan, I want you to read this carefully because I don't often
shout and I would hate for this effort to go unnoticed. Your posting
here makes me feel like I just gargled with a cup of maggots. If you
continue to try to involve my name in your sleaze campaign, whether on
Wikipedia, here, or anywhere else, I will rain hell down on you until
the rats kick you out of your box because they can't stand the heat.
If you had the brains Darwin gave a titmouse you'd realize such
obvious and slimy campaigning has a disastrous effect on any legal
action. That is, other than what will doubtlessly be several cases
against you for slander and worse. If you have any case at all, which
I doubt, get on with it and shut up.

This is a very funny and surprising remark. For more than four years
BillBrockhas been attacking me at least ten times a day, calling me
a "child molester" and and various other names. He even recently
stated on Wikipedia that it is his "hobby" to attack me.

Now, he threatens me saying that he will "rain hell down" as though he
will do more than he has already done.

The first instance I can find ofBrockcalling me a "child molester"
was on August 6, 2003, under "Will Sam Sloan Sue?"

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.g.../msg/0664a1fbc...

So now that I actually have finally sued him after being called a
child molester by BillBrockhundreds of times over a period of four
years and now that the summons and complaint were apparently served on
him on Friday, he seems to be threatening me as to what he will do if
I do not drop the suit.

Sam Sloan

"[A]pparently served"? Either I was served, or I wasn't....

http://direkickfeud.blogspot.com/200...in-praxis.html

Well?

On Oct 21, 6:04 pm, wrote:
On Oct 18, 5:30 pm, wrote:



On Oct 15, 8:06 am, samsloan wrote:

On Oct 14, 10:00 pm, [quoted the following passage authored by Mig Greengard]:

Sam Sloan, I want you to read this carefully because I don't often
shout and I would hate for this effort to go unnoticed. Your posting
here makes me feel like I just gargled with a cup of maggots. If you
continue to try to involve my name in your sleaze campaign, whether on
Wikipedia, here, or anywhere else, I will rain hell down on you until
the rats kick you out of your box because they can't stand the heat.
If you had the brains Darwin gave a titmouse you'd realize such
obvious and slimy campaigning has a disastrous effect on any legal
action. That is, other than what will doubtlessly be several cases
against you for slander and worse. If you have any case at all, which
I doubt, get on with it and shut up.

This is a very funny and surprising remark. For more than four years
BillBrockhas been attacking me at least ten times a day, calling me
a "child molester" and and various other names. He even recently
stated on Wikipedia that it is his "hobby" to attack me.

Now, he threatens me saying that he will "rain hell down" as though he
will do more than he has already done.

The first instance I can find ofBrockcalling me a "child molester"
was on August 6, 2003, under "Will Sam Sloan Sue?"

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.g.../msg/0664a1fbc...

So now that I actually have finally sued him after being called a
child molester by BillBrockhundreds of times over a period of four
years and now that the summons and complaint were apparently served on
him on Friday, he seems to be threatening me as to what he will do if
I do not drop the suit.

Sam Sloan

"[A]pparently served"? Either I was served, or I wasn't....

http://direkickfeud.blogspot.com/200...in-praxis.html

Well?

I sense this is a repeat of the 'certified mail is the same as
personal service' farce.

On Oct 21, 6:09 pm, The Historian wrote:
On Oct 21, 6:04 pm, wrote:

I sense this is a repeat of the 'certified mail is the same as
personal service' farce.

Whatever was in the 9 x 12 envelope wasn't even certified.

A successful plaintiff would be unlikely to get $10 million out of me
in my lifetime, but I'm not judgment-proof, either.

OTOH, Sloan's utter incompetence argues for his return to the USCF
Board.