Paul Truong, who has not been heard from almost since I filed my
lawsuit against him on October 2, 2007, has posted today on
chessdiscussion.com

chessdiscussion.com is a safe medium for Truong because it is owned by
Truong and registered to Truong. It is moderated by Gregory Alexander
who deletes any remarks negative towards Polgar or Truong Here is the
registration information:

Registrant:
Paul Truong
6923 Indiana Avenue
154
Lubbock, Texas 79413
United States

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: CHESSDISCUSSION.COM
Created on: 08-Sep-07
Expires on: 08-Sep-12
Last Updated on: 11-Sep-07

Administrative Contact:
Truong, Paul
6923 Indiana Avenue
154
Lubbock, Texas 79413
United States

Chessdiscussion.com is almost completely dead with Polgar and her few
remaining supporters almost the only posters there. Here is what
Truong posts in the "anti-immigrant" thread started by Gregory
Alexander:


Gregory,

I am used to this. I am by the way not an immigrant. I am a political
refugee from a country that no longer exists. I came to America with
nothing at the age of 14 and retired from my profession at the age of
35-36. I spent the last 7 years doing what I enjoy with my best friend
in the whole world. If I let these people bother me, I would never be
able to accomplish anything. I quit chess during my teenage years
because of the same thing we see today with the USCF. The same people
ridiculed the posts on Susan's blog during the election when these
types of posts surfaced. And now the same thing started again in the
official USCF forum with a real person behind it. Let them continue to
bark daily. Let us do what is right for chess. If the person who made
this comment apologizes for his comment and moves on, that would be
fine by me. I am not interested in getting even.

Best Regards,

Paul Truong
http://www.SusanPolgar.com

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:53:16 -0000, samsloan
wrote:

Excuse me. Why are you posting that information on the NG? So you
want spammers now to hit his site I see. Are you hoping for a black
hat hacker to attack him? You can get in a lot of trouble for what
you just did.

EZoto

On Oct 29, 6:11 pm, EZoto wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:53:16 -0000, samsloan
wrote:

Excuse me. Why are you posting that information on the NG? So you
want spammers now to hit his site I see. Are you hoping for a black
hat hacker to attack him? You can get in a lot of trouble for what
you just did.

EZoto

Fortunately or Unfortunatley depending on your perspective this is not
the case.
Domain registration information is publicly available so he will not
"get in alot of trouble"
Took only seconds to validate Sam's post via a whois search.
While what he did is in severely poor taste to the point of being
indefensable it is not illegal.

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:10:38 -0700, wrote:

On Oct 29, 6:11 pm, EZoto wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:53:16 -0000, samsloan
wrote:

Excuse me. Why are you posting that information on the NG? So you
want spammers now to hit his site I see. Are you hoping for a black
hat hacker to attack him? You can get in a lot of trouble for what
you just did.

EZoto

Fortunately or Unfortunatley depending on your perspective this is not
the case.
Domain registration information is publicly available so he will not
"get in alot of trouble"
Took only seconds to validate Sam's post via a whois search.
While what he did is in severely poor taste to the point of being
indefensable it is not illegal.

True not illegal. But the severely poor taste part is obvious.

EZoto