December 10 has come and gone. Has the report Mr. Lafferty promised
been published anywhere?

The Historian wrote:
December 10 has come and gone. Has the report Mr. Lafferty promised
been published anywhere?

Yes, us scandal junkies are waiting for the next installment in this
farce... :^)

And, our interest in the histrionics of P Innes is flagging...
--

Cheers,
Rev. J.D. Walker, MsD, U.C.

J.D. Walker wrote:
The Historian wrote:
December 10 has come and gone. Has the report Mr. Lafferty promised
been published anywhere?

Yes, us scandal junkies are waiting for the next installment in this
farce... :^)

And, our interest in the histrionics of P Innes is flagging...
--

Cheers,
Rev. J.D. Walker, MsD, U.C.

Oh, but the latest installment is priceless. I laughed out loud at his
lengthy anal-ysis of me as the FSS - it's mingled with his latest cry
of pain about my former obesity. Innes thinks he scores points in
debate by mocking someone's physical appearance. What does that tell
us about the quality of his mind?

"J.D. Walker" wrote in message
...
The Historian wrote:
December 10 has come and gone. Has the report Mr. Lafferty promised
been published anywhere?

Yes, us scandal junkies are waiting for the next installment in this
farce... :^)

And, our interest in the histrionics of P Innes is flagging...
--

Cheers,
Rev. J.D. Walker, MsD, U.C.

The irreverent Walker takes a toke on cue from an abusenik and serial
stalker, [look at any 100 recent posts, any newsgroup, look anytime at any
100 for the past 5 years] who has co-incidentally re-appeared now that the
FSS has gone. To say so is 'histrionics' to the irreverent Walker, since it
must seem like an excitable claim to anyone who actually knows nothing at
all, and who can;t be bothered to know - prefers to spit a bit and make dick
jokes.

Did I mention that playing with people's names is also an FSS attribute.
Funny though, Brennan always does it.

But who the hell is Walker to say anything; this guy enthusiastically joins
in the ad hominists kangaroo court, which they joke, 'satirises' other
perspectives. Pretty /insistent/ on their satire though - you can't really
tell it from gross and abusive intolerance of other opinion.

Reverend? I don't think so!
Cheers? Not exactly more cheerful than Eeyore above.

Walker is a recent arrival with the rest of the new crew, who together
conspire to make a little campaign here on usenet, and are, every one of
them, intolerant and impatient of the law of the land, and not one of them
will aver that as being superior to their own jurisdiction, or should I say
predilection to avoid decency in public expression?

Phil Innes

Chess One wrote:
"J.D. Walker" wrote in message
...
The Historian wrote:
December 10 has come and gone. Has the report Mr. Lafferty promised
been published anywhere?
Yes, us scandal junkies are waiting for the next installment in this
farce... :^)

And, our interest in the histrionics of P Innes is flagging...
--

Cheers,
Rev. J.D. Walker, MsD, U.C.

The irreverent Walker takes a toke on cue from an abusenik and serial
stalker, [look at any 100 recent posts, any newsgroup, look anytime at any
100 for the past 5 years] who has co-incidentally re-appeared now that the
FSS has gone. To say so is 'histrionics' to the irreverent Walker, since it
must seem like an excitable claim to anyone who actually knows nothing at
all, and who can;t be bothered to know - prefers to spit a bit and make dick
jokes.

Did I mention that playing with people's names is also an FSS attribute.
Funny though, Brennan always does it.

But who the hell is Walker to say anything; this guy enthusiastically joins
in the ad hominists kangaroo court, which they joke, 'satirises' other
perspectives. Pretty /insistent/ on their satire though - you can't really
tell it from gross and abusive intolerance of other opinion.

Reverend? I don't think so!
Cheers? Not exactly more cheerful than Eeyore above.

Walker is a recent arrival with the rest of the new crew, who together
conspire to make a little campaign here on usenet, and are, every one of
them, intolerant and impatient of the law of the land, and not one of them
will aver that as being superior to their own jurisdiction, or should I say
predilection to avoid decency in public expression?

Phil Innes


Booooooring................

On Dec 11, 10:21 am, "J.D. Walker" wrote:
Chess One wrote:
"J.D. Walker" wrote in message
...
The Historian wrote:
December 10 has come and gone. Has the report Mr. Lafferty promised
been published anywhere?
Yes, us scandal junkies are waiting for the next installment in this
farce... :^)

And, our interest in the histrionics of P Innes is flagging...
--

Cheers,
Rev. J.D. Walker, MsD, U.C.

The irreverent Walker takes a toke on cue from an abusenik and serial
stalker, [look at any 100 recent posts, any newsgroup, look anytime at any
100 for the past 5 years] who has co-incidentally re-appeared now that the
FSS has gone. To say so is 'histrionics' to the irreverent Walker, since it
must seem like an excitable claim to anyone who actually knows nothing at
all, and who can;t be bothered to know - prefers to spit a bit and make dick
jokes.

Did I mention that playing with people's names is also an FSS attribute.
Funny though, Brennan always does it.

But who the hell is Walker to say anything; this guy enthusiastically joins
in the ad hominists kangaroo court, which they joke, 'satirises' other
perspectives. Pretty /insistent/ on their satire though - you can't really
tell it from gross and abusive intolerance of other opinion.

Reverend? I don't think so!
Cheers? Not exactly more cheerful than Eeyore above.

Walker is a recent arrival with the rest of the new crew, who together
conspire to make a little campaign here on usenet, and are, every one of
them, intolerant and impatient of the law of the land, and not one of them
will aver that as being superior to their own jurisdiction, or should I say
predilection to avoid decency in public expression?

Phil Innes

Booooooring................

I agree. There's nothing there my personal stalker Phil Innes hasn't
been posting about since 2001.

"The Historian" wrote in message
...
J.D. Walker wrote:
The Historian wrote:
December 10 has come and gone. Has the report Mr. Lafferty promised
been published anywhere?

Yes, us scandal junkies are waiting for the next installment in this
farce... :^)

And, our interest in the histrionics of P Innes is flagging...
--

Cheers,
Rev. J.D. Walker, MsD, U.C.

Oh, but the latest installment is priceless. I laughed out loud at his
lengthy anal-ysis of me as the FSS

You must understand, stalker says to Walker, who is bored [but lazy] and
wants to have fun at others expense, and he should be okay here if he likes
his schadenfreude fresh.

But I said Brennan had the same /condition/ as the stalker - an obsessive
abusenik who jokes on other's names, even adopts them - of and course he
will deny it - while continuing to snip it as laughable and then prove every
miserable word of it true by his actions.

That I suggest to the false-Reverend is the difference between philosophy
and rhetoric - one is to say what you do, and the other can be just to say.

I think Walker is not interested in any of this talk of decent public
expression, by his own actions, not what he says he does - and he already
nailed his colors to the mast; they're brown.

Phil Innes

- it's mingled with his latest cry
of pain about my former obesity. Innes thinks he scores points in
debate by mocking someone's physical appearance. What does that tell
us about the quality of his mind?

Chess One wrote:
"The Historian" wrote in message
...
J.D. Walker wrote:
The Historian wrote:
December 10 has come and gone. Has the report Mr. Lafferty promised
been published anywhere?
Yes, us scandal junkies are waiting for the next installment in this
farce... :^)

And, our interest in the histrionics of P Innes is flagging...
--

Cheers,
Rev. J.D. Walker, MsD, U.C.
Oh, but the latest installment is priceless. I laughed out loud at his
lengthy anal-ysis of me as the FSS

You must understand, stalker says to Walker, who is bored [but lazy] and
wants to have fun at others expense, and he should be okay here if he likes
his schadenfreude fresh.

But I said Brennan had the same /condition/ as the stalker - an obsessive
abusenik who jokes on other's names, even adopts them - of and course he
will deny it - while continuing to snip it as laughable and then prove every
miserable word of it true by his actions.

That I suggest to the false-Reverend is the difference between philosophy
and rhetoric - one is to say what you do, and the other can be just to say.

I think Walker is not interested in any of this talk of decent public
expression, by his own actions, not what he says he does - and he already
nailed his colors to the mast; they're brown.

Phil Innes

- it's mingled with his latest cry
of pain about my former obesity. Innes thinks he scores points in
debate by mocking someone's physical appearance. What does that tell
us about the quality of his mind?


Still very boring... Can't you do any better?

On Dec 11, 10:34 am, "J.D. Walker" wrote:
Chess One wrote:
"The Historian" wrote in message
...
J.D. Walker wrote:
The Historian wrote:
December 10 has come and gone. Has the report Mr. Lafferty promised
been published anywhere?
Yes, us scandal junkies are waiting for the next installment in this
farce... :^)

And, our interest in the histrionics of P Innes is flagging...
--

Cheers,
Rev. J.D. Walker, MsD, U.C.
Oh, but the latest installment is priceless. I laughed out loud at his
lengthy anal-ysis of me as the FSS

You must understand, stalker says to Walker, who is bored [but lazy] and
wants to have fun at others expense, and he should be okay here if he likes
his schadenfreude fresh.

But I said Brennan had the same /condition/ as the stalker - an obsessive
abusenik who jokes on other's names, even adopts them - of and course he
will deny it - while continuing to snip it as laughable and then prove every
miserable word of it true by his actions.

That I suggest to the false-Reverend is the difference between philosophy
and rhetoric - one is to say what you do, and the other can be just to say.

I think Walker is not interested in any of this talk of decent public
expression, by his own actions, not what he says he does - and he already
nailed his colors to the mast; they're brown.

Phil Innes

- it's mingled with his latest cry
of pain about my former obesity. Innes thinks he scores points in
debate by mocking someone's physical appearance. What does that tell
us about the quality of his mind?

Still very boring... Can't you do any better?

My apologies, Reverend Walker, for what follows:

Mr. Innes has threatened violence against
a number of posters. These include myself, Taylor Kingston, Mike
Nolan,
and others. For a pithy example, search for the phrase "sharper than
wit" in the archives. Or read it here. I'll let Philth's own words
speak again:

"The FBI will possibly in touch with you Brennen; for your own
expressions
seem to inexplicably engender abuse of others (not only myself). But
for
myself, I simply offer you the reflection that their are sharper
things than
wit.

"And if you **** with me and mine I will certainly make entirely sure
you
understand me without a shadow of a doubt. I am possibly over my
petit-fascist tolerancing line.

"Is this sufficiently clear?"

And:

"I am prepared to visit you to discuss our differences - what do you
say to
that? You can be up front about it here or simply wait until I show
up. If
you are at all alarmed at the potential threat of this message I
suggest you
contact the FBI."

And:

"Brennen- you fail to understand - you have booked yourself a date!

"You are the mother****er who has continously excited these events,
based on
ad hominem attack, and who now cannot even remember their consequence,
preferring, as you do, the words of the rascist (and ******) abuser,
as
apparently did St. Niro.

"Hang on for a month or two if you can, and eventually I'll make it
down and
visit you where you are and we'll get things entirely clear between
us.

"This is not, as you realise, the proverbial threat, but an absolutely
solid
promise of response to continuous provocation against myself and my
family.

"If you want to accelerate the encounter, come."

And here's Philth with his potty mouth on:

"I must remind any reader here that the person who writes this
describes
himself as an 'historian', but one who has apparently read ****-all."

"But still you **** with the subject, lol!!"

"Louis, this is boring beyond tears. I have wondered why you agitate
on
the
unbidden behest of others, without the slightest attempt to even
identify
what the **** you are now objecting to"

"You are the mother****er who has continously excited these events,"

"And if you **** with me and mine I will certainly make entirely sure
you
understand me without a shadow of a doubt."

"Will your sub-personality xganon-**** show up..."

"**** your condolences."

"if you cant write your own name to your posts why dont you **** off?"

"...**** that for a game of charlies!"

"Mala fides, malignum spernere vulgus!
(Bad faith and **** the people)"

"Neither of these people seem to me to be hyphenable-**** to me."

"If you want to **** with me lets sort it out. Come on... Lets do it.
Where
do you both live?"

"So interest from Americans has to go around, even avoid USCF [because
they
will **** it up],"

"'****' Sam, why be coy when talking of freudian sluts"

"**** him! "

The Historian wrote:
On Dec 11, 10:34 am, "J.D. Walker" wrote:
Chess One wrote:
"The Historian" wrote in message
...
J.D. Walker wrote:
The Historian wrote:
December 10 has come and gone. Has the report Mr. Lafferty promised
been published anywhere?
Yes, us scandal junkies are waiting for the next installment in this
farce... :^)
And, our interest in the histrionics of P Innes is flagging...
--
Cheers,
Rev. J.D. Walker, MsD, U.C.
Oh, but the latest installment is priceless. I laughed out loud at his
lengthy anal-ysis of me as the FSS
You must understand, stalker says to Walker, who is bored [but lazy] and
wants to have fun at others expense, and he should be okay here if he likes
his schadenfreude fresh.
But I said Brennan had the same /condition/ as the stalker - an obsessive
abusenik who jokes on other's names, even adopts them - of and course he
will deny it - while continuing to snip it as laughable and then prove every
miserable word of it true by his actions.
That I suggest to the false-Reverend is the difference between philosophy
and rhetoric - one is to say what you do, and the other can be just to say.
I think Walker is not interested in any of this talk of decent public
expression, by his own actions, not what he says he does - and he already
nailed his colors to the mast; they're brown.
Phil Innes
- it's mingled with his latest cry
of pain about my former obesity. Innes thinks he scores points in
debate by mocking someone's physical appearance. What does that tell
us about the quality of his mind?
Still very boring... Can't you do any better?

My apologies, Reverend Walker, for what follows:

Mr. Innes has threatened violence against
a number of posters. These include myself, Taylor Kingston, Mike
Nolan,
and others. For a pithy example, search for the phrase "sharper than
wit" in the archives. Or read it here. I'll let Philth's own words
speak again:

"The FBI will possibly in touch with you Brennen; for your own
expressions
seem to inexplicably engender abuse of others (not only myself). But
for
myself, I simply offer you the reflection that their are sharper
things than
wit.

"And if you **** with me and mine I will certainly make entirely sure
you
understand me without a shadow of a doubt. I am possibly over my
petit-fascist tolerancing line.

"Is this sufficiently clear?"

And:

"I am prepared to visit you to discuss our differences - what do you
say to
that? You can be up front about it here or simply wait until I show
up. If
you are at all alarmed at the potential threat of this message I
suggest you
contact the FBI."

And:

"Brennen- you fail to understand - you have booked yourself a date!

"You are the mother****er who has continously excited these events,
based on
ad hominem attack, and who now cannot even remember their consequence,
preferring, as you do, the words of the rascist (and ******) abuser,
as
apparently did St. Niro.

"Hang on for a month or two if you can, and eventually I'll make it
down and
visit you where you are and we'll get things entirely clear between
us.

"This is not, as you realise, the proverbial threat, but an absolutely
solid
promise of response to continuous provocation against myself and my
family.

"If you want to accelerate the encounter, come."

And here's Philth with his potty mouth on:

"I must remind any reader here that the person who writes this
describes
himself as an 'historian', but one who has apparently read ****-all."

"But still you **** with the subject, lol!!"

"Louis, this is boring beyond tears. I have wondered why you agitate
on
the
unbidden behest of others, without the slightest attempt to even
identify
what the **** you are now objecting to"

"You are the mother****er who has continously excited these events,"

"And if you **** with me and mine I will certainly make entirely sure
you
understand me without a shadow of a doubt."

"Will your sub-personality xganon-**** show up..."

"**** your condolences."

"if you cant write your own name to your posts why dont you **** off?"

"...**** that for a game of charlies!"

"Mala fides, malignum spernere vulgus!
(Bad faith and **** the people)"

"Neither of these people seem to me to be hyphenable-**** to me."

"If you want to **** with me lets sort it out. Come on... Lets do it.
Where
do you both live?"

"So interest from Americans has to go around, even avoid USCF [because
they
will **** it up],"

"'****' Sam, why be coy when talking of freudian sluts"

"**** him! "

I find the combination of people afflicted by severe personality
disorders along with delusional affectations of great writing skill to
be particularly disturbing. While they dress up their prose with odd
orts from the local dump like an eccentric's Christmas tree, their
readers are left wondering if they any clue about anything, or if it is
best to herd the family into the fallout shelter until the loon has
passed on to other victims...

Of course, I am not a writer, so perhaps there is some facet of the
gent's art that escapes me... :^)
--

Cheers,
Rev. J.D. Walker, MsD, U.C.