Guy Macon wrote:
David Richerby wrote:
Guy Macon http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote:

Some of us have actual lives to live. I spent 3 weeks last month at
a remote jobsite, too busy to read chess newsgroups, and I go back
Sunday. If you have a requirement that I read everything posted
here, let me know and I will give you an estimate of how much you
would have to pay me. Otherwise, me asking for a URL for something
that has not been recently posted is something you will have to
accept.
http://www.just****inggoogleit.com/?...ershead+report

The above assumes that I asked for a URL for the Mottershead
report. I did not. I asked for a URL containing the evidence.
In a response to my request I recieved a URL to the Mottershead
report and a URL to a report from Robert Jones of Craic Computing.

More importantly, I obtained a vital piece of information that
a Google search would not have revealed; I found out that those
who think Truong guilty consider the Mottershead and Jones reports
to be the main evidence against him, and that there isn't some
third report that I should be looking at.


Mr. Macon,

There were persistent rumors of a third report that was to contain
further analysis of the Mottershead report. This report never
materialized. Perhaps the rumors were false, or perhaps the report is
being reserved for the upcoming legal battle.

I place great value on serious reporting by competent professionals on
their field of specialty. I place almost zero value on the bizarre
conjectures by many of the anonymous re-mailers that plague several
sides of this issue. The anons will never make it to the witness stand.

It is unfortunate that the third report did not arrive.
--

Cordially,
Rev. J.D. Walker, MsD, U.C.