![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: affidavit, dismiss, diversity, issue, motion, opposition |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 3, 11:54 am, "Chess One" wrote:
"samsloan" wrote in message ... On Feb 3, 8:29 am, The Historian wrote: On Feb 3, 4:37 am, samsloan wrote: What does Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell think he is accomplishing by constantly overwriting other people's threads? Google Groups only displays the title of the most recent post in a thread. Right. Now, does Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell think that the USCF is going to hire him after all or that I am going to let him back in my group because he keeps doing this? I assume that Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell is the same person as "Tennessee Vols" who has been attacking people over on Susan Polgar's http://www.chessdiscussion.com Nah! This is our own Which Mitch? Remember, the guy posted stuff at 'your' Yahoo group for 2 years until he asked questions about /your/ er... 'activities' and responsibilites for such remarks as you make above! This is the real "Lex" Mitchell" aka "Blair-Slayer", and unless you are in truth, Super-Sloan of Metropolis, you'd bett'rn not mess up your Mitchells, boy, cuz this doggee /is/ gonna hunt! BTW - you really should not reveal materials about job applicants at uscf any more than you may sensibly comment on employee's medical conditions - its against the law. If indeed you did just mention that I believe you renew your offence, and therefore legal resentment of it can be renewed. ![]() Phil Innes So, in other words, you are saying that I should not let readers know that Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell applied twice for a job with the USCF, was turned down, and has been attacking the USCF here ever since. Sam Sloan |
| Ads |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"samsloan" wrote in message ... On Feb 3, 11:54 am, "Chess One" wrote: "samsloan" wrote in message ... On Feb 3, 8:29 am, The Historian wrote: On Feb 3, 4:37 am, samsloan wrote: What does Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell think he is accomplishing by constantly overwriting other people's threads? Google Groups only displays the title of the most recent post in a thread. Right. Now, does Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell think that the USCF is going to hire him after all or that I am going to let him back in my group because he keeps doing this? I assume that Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell is the same person as "Tennessee Vols" who has been attacking people over on Susan Polgar's http://www.chessdiscussion.com Nah! This is our own Which Mitch? Remember, the guy posted stuff at 'your' Yahoo group for 2 years until he asked questions about /your/ er... 'activities' and responsibilites for such remarks as you make above! This is the real "Lex" Mitchell" aka "Blair-Slayer", and unless you are in truth, Super-Sloan of Metropolis, you'd bett'rn not mess up your Mitchells, boy, cuz this doggee /is/ gonna hunt! BTW - you really should not reveal materials about job applicants at uscf any more than you may sensibly comment on employee's medical conditions - its against the law. If indeed you did just mention that I believe you renew your offence, and therefore legal resentment of it can be renewed. ![]() Phil Innes So, in other words, you are saying that I should not let readers know that Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell applied twice for a job with the USCF, was turned down, and has been attacking the USCF here ever since. Whether you should do so or not is of an imperative factor ['should'] known only to yourself; but whether you break the law in doing so is less equivocal: You do. Phil Innes Sam Sloan |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 3, 12:24 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
"samsloan" wrote in message ... On Feb 3, 11:54 am, "Chess One" wrote: "samsloan" wrote in message ... On Feb 3, 8:29 am, The Historian wrote: On Feb 3, 4:37 am, samsloan wrote: What does Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell think he is accomplishing by constantly overwriting other people's threads? Google Groups only displays the title of the most recent post in a thread. Right. Now, does Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell think that the USCF is going to hire him after all or that I am going to let him back in my group because he keeps doing this? I assume that Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell is the same person as "Tennessee Vols" who has been attacking people over on Susan Polgar's http://www.chessdiscussion.com Nah! This is our own Which Mitch? Remember, the guy posted stuff at 'your' Yahoo group for 2 years until he asked questions about /your/ er... 'activities' and responsibilites for such remarks as you make above! This is the real "Lex" Mitchell" aka "Blair-Slayer", and unless you are in truth, Super-Sloan of Metropolis, you'd bett'rn not mess up your Mitchells, boy, cuz this doggee /is/ gonna hunt! BTW - you really should not reveal materials about job applicants at uscf any more than you may sensibly comment on employee's medical conditions - its against the law. If indeed you did just mention that I believe you renew your offence, and therefore legal resentment of it can be renewed. ![]() Phil Innes So, in other words, you are saying that I should not let readers know that Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell applied twice for a job with the USCF, was turned down, and has been attacking the USCF here ever since. Whether you should do so or not is of an imperative factor ['should'] known only to yourself; but whether you break the law in doing so is less equivocal: You do. Phil Innes In that case, kindly go to the DA and get this miscreant off the streets. (I thought your law license had expired.) |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
"samsloan" wrote in message ... On Feb 3, 12:24 pm, "Chess One" wrote: "samsloan" wrote in message ... On Feb 3, 11:54 am, "Chess One" wrote: "samsloan" wrote in message ... On Feb 3, 8:29 am, The Historian wrote: On Feb 3, 4:37 am, samsloan wrote: What does Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell think he is accomplishing by constantly overwriting other people's threads? Google Groups only displays the title of the most recent post in a thread. Right. Now, does Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell think that the USCF is going to hire him after all or that I am going to let him back in my group because he keeps doing this? I assume that Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell is the same person as "Tennessee Vols" who has been attacking people over on Susan Polgar's http://www.chessdiscussion.com Nah! This is our own Which Mitch? Remember, the guy posted stuff at 'your' Yahoo group for 2 years until he asked questions about /your/ er... 'activities' and responsibilites for such remarks as you make above! This is the real "Lex" Mitchell" aka "Blair-Slayer", and unless you are in truth, Super-Sloan of Metropolis, you'd bett'rn not mess up your Mitchells, boy, cuz this doggee /is/ gonna hunt! BTW - you really should not reveal materials about job applicants at uscf any more than you may sensibly comment on employee's medical conditions - its against the law. If indeed you did just mention that I believe you renew your offence, and therefore legal resentment of it can be renewed. ![]() Phil Innes So, in other words, you are saying that I should not let readers know that Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell applied twice for a job with the USCF, was turned down, and has been attacking the USCF here ever since. Whether you should do so or not is of an imperative factor ['should'] known only to yourself; but whether you break the law in doing so is less equivocal: You do. Phil Innes In that case, kindly go to the DA and get this miscreant off the streets. (I thought your law license had expired.) What you might think instead is that this continued instance of indiscretion may have a couple of consequences - that someone calls you to account for it, and secondly, who would trust such a person near personnel records again? And will that not utterly sink your remaining future political chances? My decency licence has not expired, neither is this keyboard likely to. Phil Innes |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 3, 1:02 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
"samsloan" wrote in message ... On Feb 3, 12:24 pm, "Chess One" wrote: "samsloan" wrote in message ... On Feb 3, 11:54 am, "Chess One" wrote: "samsloan" wrote in message ... On Feb 3, 8:29 am, The Historian wrote: On Feb 3, 4:37 am, samsloan wrote: What does Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell think he is accomplishing by constantly overwriting other people's threads? Google Groups only displays the title of the most recent post in a thread. Right. Now, does Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell think that the USCF is going to hire him after all or that I am going to let him back in my group because he keeps doing this? I assume that Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell is the same person as "Tennessee Vols" who has been attacking people over on Susan Polgar's http://www.chessdiscussion.com Nah! This is our own Which Mitch? Remember, the guy posted stuff at 'your' Yahoo group for 2 years until he asked questions about /your/ er... 'activities' and responsibilites for such remarks as you make above! This is the real "Lex" Mitchell" aka "Blair-Slayer", and unless you are in truth, Super-Sloan of Metropolis, you'd bett'rn not mess up your Mitchells, boy, cuz this doggee /is/ gonna hunt! BTW - you really should not reveal materials about job applicants at uscf any more than you may sensibly comment on employee's medical conditions - its against the law. If indeed you did just mention that I believe you renew your offence, and therefore legal resentment of it can be renewed. ![]() Phil Innes So, in other words, you are saying that I should not let readers know that Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell applied twice for a job with the USCF, was turned down, and has been attacking the USCF here ever since. Whether you should do so or not is of an imperative factor ['should'] known only to yourself; but whether you break the law in doing so is less equivocal: You do. Phil Innes In that case, kindly go to the DA and get this miscreant off the streets. (I thought your law license had expired.) What you might think instead is that this continued instance of indiscretion may have a couple of consequences - that someone calls you to account for it, and secondly, who would trust such a person near personnel records again? And will that not utterly sink your remaining future political chances? My decency licence has not expired, neither is this keyboard likely to. Phil Innes By the way, you never had a decency license. Incidentally, I was not on the board when Rob ("The Robber") Mitchell applied for jobs working for the USCF, and I played no role in the decisions not to hire him. Sam Sloan |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mohammed Sloan has lost his mind
Who- Ha, Who-Ha Look as he may he just cant find Reason nor a rhyme The greatest of his time? The greatest in his mind! Mohammed Sloan has lost his mind But it ain't worth a dime. Mohammed Sloan he breaks the law Who-ha, who -ha Files lawsuit like you you never saw Annoying like a caw Greatest of all time? Only in his mind Mohammed Sloan has lost his mind But it ain't worth a dime. (sung to the tune of "Camptown Racers" Sam Sloan |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
does not recognize the address of 2084 Route 94, Salisbury Mills NY 12577. However, if he does not know his own address, that probably indicates that he no longer lives there. When did those several people visit Bill at his home? I will bet that it was years ago. Once the USCF moved away from New Windsor, there was no reason for Bill Goichberg to stay near there. Sam Sloan |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 5, 6:00 pm, samsloan wrote:
Quote:
Most likely Bill made a mistake in the address. The US Post Office does not recognize the address of 2084 Route 94, Salisbury Mills NY 12577. However, if he does not know his own address, that probably indicates that he no longer lives there. When did those several people visit Bill at his home? I will bet that it was years ago. Once the USCF moved away from New Windsor, there was no reason for Bill Goichberg to stay near there. Sam Sloan edited August 14, 2007: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...ldid=151295430 "The New York State Chess Association (NYSCA) is the oldest continuously-run chess organization in the United States [....] Its president is Bill Goichberg of Salisbury Mills in Orange County, who is also U.S. Chess Federation president." |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 5, 7:21 pm, wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:00 pm, samsloan wrote: Quote:
Most likely Bill made a mistake in the address. The US Post Office does not recognize the address of 2084 Route 94, Salisbury Mills NY 12577. However, if he does not know his own address, that probably indicates that he no longer lives there. When did those several people visit Bill at his home? I will bet that it was years ago. Once the USCF moved away from New Windsor, there was no reason for Bill Goichberg to stay near there. Sam Sloan edited August 14, 2007: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...e_Chess_Associ... "The New York State Chess Association (NYSCA) is the oldest continuously-run chess organization in the United States [....] Its president is Bill Goichberg of Salisbury Mills in Orange County, who is also U.S. Chess Federation president." http://www.google.com/patents?id=PSM...bstract&zoom=4 Note the residence of co-inventor Goichberg.... |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
samsloan wrote: Quote:
Most likely Bill made a mistake in the address. The US Post Office does not recognize the address of 2084 Route 94, Salisbury Mills NY 12577. However, if he does not know his own address, that probably indicates that he no longer lives there. When did those several people visit Bill at his home? I will bet that it was years ago. Once the USCF moved away from New Windsor, there was no reason for Bill Goichberg to stay near there. Sam Sloan False. Jerry Hanken has been there several times in recent years. Joe Lux has telephoned him there. Donna Alarie found an on-line photo of the place. Of course you can claim that they're all lying. Maybe everybody's lying. Perhaps They go around tearing down all those false- front buildings when they're not needed to deceive you. But I think Heinlein already wrote that story. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sam Sloan censured by Executive Board | Duncan Oxley | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 30 | December 8th 06 01:22 PM |