The Board refused ...

wrote:
On Feb 4, 2:27 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
An extract from a letter just published in the editorial column, Alekhine's
Parrot, atwww.chessville.comorhttp://www.chessville.com/Editorials/AlekhinesParrot/Index.htm

reads;-

---

You have no sufficient evidence for any of these charges. After more than
four months of investigation and wasting tens and thousands dollars of USCF
money, you still have nothing. The evidence which was sent to Mr.
Kronenberger was more than enough to show that the report had the wrong
conclusion.
The board majority refused to allow our experts to examine the data for more
than 4 months.

The board majority refused to investigate wrong doings by the USCF
contractors and members of the board majority.

The board majority refused to investigate leaks of confidential information
as well as the "unauthorized secret negotiation" between Jerry Hanken and
Sam Sloan using confidential board information in the middle of a lawsuit.

Susan Polgar

Truong says (through S.P.): "You have no sufficient evidence..."

This is identical to Truong's misuse of the English language in his
earlier press release:
When asked if he was the Fake Sam Sloan, he replied:

"Absolutely no..."]

Trolgar has been marginalized to the point of using sites like
Chessville to propagandize. Some traffic rankings from Trolgar outlets;

Chessville 309,373
Chess Discussion 524,423
Polgar Blog 187,213
Chessgoddess 3,581,650

Non-Trolgar/News Outlets:
USCF 96,729
Chessbase 14,357

Brian Lafferty wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 4, 2:27 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
An extract from a letter just published in the editorial column,
Alekhine's
Parrot,
atwww.chessville.comorhttp://www.chessville.com/Editorials/AlekhinesParrot/Index.htm


reads;-

---

You have no sufficient evidence for any of these charges. After more
than
four months of investigation and wasting tens and thousands dollars
of USCF
money, you still have nothing. The evidence which was sent to Mr.
Kronenberger was more than enough to show that the report had the wrong
conclusion.
The board majority refused to allow our experts to examine the data
for more
than 4 months.

The board majority refused to investigate wrong doings by the USCF
contractors and members of the board majority.

The board majority refused to investigate leaks of confidential
information
as well as the "unauthorized secret negotiation" between Jerry Hanken
and
Sam Sloan using confidential board information in the middle of a
lawsuit.

Susan Polgar

Truong says (through S.P.): "You have no sufficient evidence..."

This is identical to Truong's misuse of the English language in his
earlier press release:
When asked if he was the Fake Sam Sloan, he replied:

"Absolutely no..."]

Trolgar has been marginalized to the point of using sites like
Chessville to propagandize. Some traffic rankings from Trolgar outlets;

Chessville 309,373
Chess Discussion 524,423
Polgar Blog 187,213
Chessgoddess 3,581,650

Non-Trolgar/News Outlets:
USCF 96,729
Chessbase 14,357

According to alexa.com about 3/4 of chessdiscussion's users log on from
Canada. Interesting, eh?

"help bot" wrote in message
...
On Feb 4, 11:44 pm, The Historian wrote:

I have seen a photo of P Innes once.

Is it online? If so, please post a link.

I'm not sure a photo of nearly-IMnes would
fit online; the man claims to be several
kilometers tall,

nonsense! I said 30 litres tall. you amurcns are idjits!

so the camera would need
to be far away and set to wide-angle.

I once saw an online photo of his boss,
Larry Parr; the man was standing upon an
ancient wonder, and thankfully, there was
solid rock underneath to support him.

thats the famous photo on the Great Wall with the paper bag - inside the bag
I understand there is an action doll of help-bot and you can twist its head
around so it faces backwards, which is the way it walks

phil innes

In
fact, that is the only instance I know of
where there was anything of substance to
support him... .


-- help bot

"Brian Lafferty" wrote in message
news:V5evj.9381$kz3.1314@trndny03...
wrote:
On Feb 4, 2:27 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
An extract from a letter just published in the editorial column,
Alekhine's
Parrot,
atwww.chessville.comorhttp://www.chessville.com/Editorials/AlekhinesParrot/Index.htm

reads;-

---

You have no sufficient evidence for any of these charges. After more
than
four months of investigation and wasting tens and thousands dollars of
USCF
money, you still have nothing. The evidence which was sent to Mr.
Kronenberger was more than enough to show that the report had the wrong
conclusion.
The board majority refused to allow our experts to examine the data for
more
than 4 months.

The board majority refused to investigate wrong doings by the USCF
contractors and members of the board majority.

The board majority refused to investigate leaks of confidential
information
as well as the "unauthorized secret negotiation" between Jerry Hanken
and
Sam Sloan using confidential board information in the middle of a
lawsuit.

Susan Polgar

Truong says (through S.P.): "You have no sufficient evidence..."

This is identical to Truong's misuse of the English language in his
earlier press release:
When asked if he was the Fake Sam Sloan, he replied:

"Absolutely no..."]

Trolgar has been marginalized to the point of using sites like Chessville
to propagandize.

Is this the same site you yourself have been doing the same?

Some traffic rankings from Trolgar outlets;

Chessville 309,373

The fact is that Chessville now gets more hits than Chesscafe, and so is
become somewhat prominent in the USA, and so is hardly marginal!

And because Chessville always has covered chess politics, whereas chesscafe
are in bed with the chess politicians and say nothing that might offend the
over-Czars

Our hit, and page hit rate, is relatively steady, and seems not to be
US-chess-catastrophe-of-the-month linked. After all 65% of readers are non
USA.

Chessville obtains about 35% of its readers from USA, and about 5% from
Canada sometimes 7%. We also obtain high levels of hits from central and
south-American countries who are Spanish speakers, since we have
dual-language newsbriefs.

Phil Innes

Chess Discussion 524,423
Polgar Blog 187,213
Chessgoddess 3,581,650

Non-Trolgar/News Outlets:
USCF 96,729
Chessbase 14,357

Chess One wrote:
"Brian Lafferty" wrote in message
news:V5evj.9381$kz3.1314@trndny03...
wrote:
On Feb 4, 2:27 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
An extract from a letter just published in the editorial column,
Alekhine's
Parrot,
atwww.chessville.comorhttp://www.chessville.com/Editorials/AlekhinesParrot/Index.htm

reads;-

---

You have no sufficient evidence for any of these charges. After more
than
four months of investigation and wasting tens and thousands dollars of
USCF
money, you still have nothing. The evidence which was sent to Mr.
Kronenberger was more than enough to show that the report had the wrong
conclusion.
The board majority refused to allow our experts to examine the data for
more
than 4 months.

The board majority refused to investigate wrong doings by the USCF
contractors and members of the board majority.

The board majority refused to investigate leaks of confidential
information
as well as the "unauthorized secret negotiation" between Jerry Hanken
and
Sam Sloan using confidential board information in the middle of a
lawsuit.

Susan Polgar
Truong says (through S.P.): "You have no sufficient evidence..."

This is identical to Truong's misuse of the English language in his
earlier press release:
When asked if he was the Fake Sam Sloan, he replied:

"Absolutely no..."]
Trolgar has been marginalized to the point of using sites like Chessville
to propagandize.

Is this the same site you yourself have been doing the same?

Some traffic rankings from Trolgar outlets;

Chessville 309,373

The fact is that Chessville now gets more hits than Chesscafe, and so is
become somewhat prominent in the USA, and so is hardly marginal!

Wrong, Bowel Boy. ChessCafe has a higher ranking than Chessville.
ChessCafe is ranked at 195,970 to Chessville's 309,373

And because Chessville always has covered chess politics, whereas chesscafe
are in bed with the chess politicians and say nothing that might offend the
over-Czars

Our hit, and page hit rate, is relatively steady, and seems not to be
US-chess-catastrophe-of-the-month linked. After all 65% of readers are non
USA.

Chessville obtains about 35% of its readers from USA, and about 5% from
Canada sometimes 7%. We also obtain high levels of hits from central and
south-American countries who are Spanish speakers, since we have
dual-language newsbriefs.

Phil Innes

Chess Discussion 524,423
Polgar Blog 187,213
Chessgoddess 3,581,650

Non-Trolgar/News Outlets:
USCF 96,729
Chessbase 14,357

"Brian Lafferty" wrote in message
news:cBhvj.20188$eg3.8850@trndny05...
Chess One wrote:
"Brian Lafferty" wrote in message
news:V5evj.9381$kz3.1314@trndny03...
wrote:
On Feb 4, 2:27 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
An extract from a letter just published in the editorial column,
Alekhine's
Parrot,
atwww.chessville.comorhttp://www.chessville.com/Editorials/AlekhinesParrot/Index.htm

reads;-

---

You have no sufficient evidence for any of these charges. After more
than
four months of investigation and wasting tens and thousands dollars of
USCF
money, you still have nothing. The evidence which was sent to Mr.
Kronenberger was more than enough to show that the report had the
wrong
conclusion.
The board majority refused to allow our experts to examine the data
for more
than 4 months.

The board majority refused to investigate wrong doings by the USCF
contractors and members of the board majority.

The board majority refused to investigate leaks of confidential
information
as well as the "unauthorized secret negotiation" between Jerry Hanken
and
Sam Sloan using confidential board information in the middle of a
lawsuit.

Susan Polgar
Truong says (through S.P.): "You have no sufficient evidence..."

This is identical to Truong's misuse of the English language in his
earlier press release:
When asked if he was the Fake Sam Sloan, he replied:

"Absolutely no..."]
Trolgar has been marginalized to the point of using sites like
Chessville to propagandize.

Is this the same site you yourself have been doing the same?

Some traffic rankings from Trolgar outlets;

Chessville 309,373

The fact is that Chessville now gets more hits than Chesscafe, and so is
become somewhat prominent in the USA, and so is hardly marginal!

Wrong, Bowel Boy. ChessCafe has a higher ranking than Chessville.
ChessCafe is ranked at 195,970 to Chessville's 309,373

I think your prosecution of all topics is as sophisticated as your wit - you
have been banned everywhere, right? Banned or Bozo'd! Or do you say
"disbarred?"

If you and other Slondinistas want to proclaim on and on about the source of
abuse - then I think you have found where it comes from in the middle of
your own company! In the meantime, try and sort out visits and pages
visited, and try to get up-to-date on things.

But if you call people by the choicest and grautitously abusive terms, then
do you not become exactly as the false-sloan was? Isn't that a curious
thing?

And you dunder-heads think you are prosecuting, but you have always been in
my mind equally suspect [!] - and there is no hidden evidence about you-all.
You demonstrate your 'qualities' in every post.

Have an ice day. Phil Innes

And because Chessville always has covered chess politics, whereas
chesscafe are in bed with the chess politicians and say nothing that
might offend the over-Czars

Our hit, and page hit rate, is relatively steady, and seems not to be
US-chess-catastrophe-of-the-month linked. After all 65% of readers are
non USA.

Chessville obtains about 35% of its readers from USA, and about 5% from
Canada sometimes 7%. We also obtain high levels of hits from central and
south-American countries who are Spanish speakers, since we have
dual-language newsbriefs.

Phil Innes

Chess Discussion 524,423
Polgar Blog 187,213
Chessgoddess 3,581,650

Non-Trolgar/News Outlets:
USCF 96,729
Chessbase 14,357

On Feb 21, 11:45*am, "Chess One" wrote:
"Brian Lafferty" wrote in message

news:cBhvj.20188$eg3.8850@trndny05...





Chess One wrote:
"Brian Lafferty" wrote in message
news:V5evj.9381$kz3.1314@trndny03...
wrote:
On Feb 4, 2:27 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
An extract from a letter just published in the editorial column,
Alekhine's
Parrot,
atwww.chessville.comorhttp://www.chessville.com/Editorials/AlekhinesPar...

reads;-

---

You have no sufficient evidence for any of these charges. After more
than
four months of investigation and wasting tens and thousands dollars of
USCF
money, you still have nothing. The evidence which was sent to Mr.
Kronenberger was more than enough to show that the report had the
wrong
conclusion.
The board majority refused to allow our experts to examine the data
for more
than 4 months.

The board majority refused to investigate wrong doings by the USCF
contractors and members of the board majority.

The board majority refused to investigate leaks of confidential
information
as well as the "unauthorized secret negotiation" between Jerry Hanken
and
Sam Sloan using confidential board information in the middle of a
lawsuit.

Susan Polgar
Truong says (through S.P.): "You have no sufficient evidence..."

This is identical to Truong's misuse of the English language in his
earlier press release:
When asked if he was the Fake Sam Sloan, he replied:

"Absolutely no..."]
Trolgar has been marginalized to the point of using sites like
Chessville to propagandize.

Is this the same site you yourself have been doing the same?

*Some traffic rankings from Trolgar outlets;

Chessville * * * 309,373

The fact is that Chessville now gets more hits than Chesscafe, and so is
become somewhat prominent in the USA, and so is hardly marginal!

Wrong, Bowel Boy. *ChessCafe has a higher ranking than Chessville.
ChessCafe is ranked at 195,970 to Chessville's 309,373

I think your prosecution of all topics is as sophisticated as your wit - you
have been banned everywhere, right? Banned or Bozo'd! Or do you say
"disbarred?"

If you and other Slondinistas want to proclaim on and on about the source of
abuse - then I think you have found where it comes from in the middle of
your own company! In the meantime, try and sort out visits and pages
visited, and try to get up-to-date on things.

But if you call people by the choicest and grautitously abusive terms, then
do you not become exactly as the false-sloan was? Isn't that a curious
thing?

And you dunder-heads think you are prosecuting, but you have always been in
my mind equally suspect [!] - and there is no hidden evidence about you-all.
You demonstrate your 'qualities' in every post.

Have an ice day. Phil Innes



And because Chessville always has covered chess politics, whereas
chesscafe are in bed with the chess politicians and say nothing that
might offend the over-Czars *

Our hit, and page hit rate, is relatively steady, and seems not to be
US-chess-catastrophe-of-the-month linked. After all 65% of readers are
non USA.

Chessville obtains about 35% of its readers from USA, and about 5% from
Canada sometimes 7%. We also obtain high levels of hits from central and
south-American countries who are Spanish speakers, since we have
dual-language newsbriefs.

Phil Innes

Chess Discussion 524,423
Polgar Blog * * *187,213
Chessgoddess * 3,581,650

Non-Trolgar/News Outlets:
USCF * * * * * * *96,729
Chessbase * * * * 14,357- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

http://siteanalytics.compete.com/che...g?metric=at t

Chess One wrote:
"Brian Lafferty" wrote in message
news:cBhvj.20188$eg3.8850@trndny05...
Chess One wrote:
"Brian Lafferty" wrote in message
news:V5evj.9381$kz3.1314@trndny03...
wrote:
On Feb 4, 2:27 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
An extract from a letter just published in the editorial column,
Alekhine's
Parrot,
atwww.chessville.comorhttp://www.chessville.com/Editorials/AlekhinesParrot/Index.htm

reads;-

---

You have no sufficient evidence for any of these charges. After more
than
four months of investigation and wasting tens and thousands dollars of
USCF
money, you still have nothing. The evidence which was sent to Mr.
Kronenberger was more than enough to show that the report had the
wrong
conclusion.
The board majority refused to allow our experts to examine the data
for more
than 4 months.

The board majority refused to investigate wrong doings by the USCF
contractors and members of the board majority.

The board majority refused to investigate leaks of confidential
information
as well as the "unauthorized secret negotiation" between Jerry Hanken
and
Sam Sloan using confidential board information in the middle of a
lawsuit.

Susan Polgar
Truong says (through S.P.): "You have no sufficient evidence..."

This is identical to Truong's misuse of the English language in his
earlier press release:
When asked if he was the Fake Sam Sloan, he replied:

"Absolutely no..."]
Trolgar has been marginalized to the point of using sites like
Chessville to propagandize.
Is this the same site you yourself have been doing the same?

Some traffic rankings from Trolgar outlets;

Chessville 309,373
The fact is that Chessville now gets more hits than Chesscafe, and so is
become somewhat prominent in the USA, and so is hardly marginal!
Wrong, Bowel Boy. ChessCafe has a higher ranking than Chessville.
ChessCafe is ranked at 195,970 to Chessville's 309,373

I think your prosecution of all topics is as sophisticated as your wit - you
have been banned everywhere, right? Banned or Bozo'd! Or do you say
"disbarred?"

If you and other Slondinistas want to proclaim on and on about the source of
abuse - then I think you have found where it comes from in the middle of
your own company! In the meantime, try and sort out visits and pages
visited, and try to get up-to-date on things.

But if you call people by the choicest and grautitously abusive terms, then
do you not become exactly as the false-sloan was? Isn't that a curious
thing?

And you dunder-heads think you are prosecuting, but you have always been in
my mind equally suspect [!] - and there is no hidden evidence about you-all.
You demonstrate your 'qualities' in every post.

Have an ice day. Phil Innes

And because Chessville always has covered chess politics, whereas
chesscafe are in bed with the chess politicians and say nothing that
might offend the over-Czars

Our hit, and page hit rate, is relatively steady, and seems not to be
US-chess-catastrophe-of-the-month linked. After all 65% of readers are
non USA.

Chessville obtains about 35% of its readers from USA, and about 5% from
Canada sometimes 7%. We also obtain high levels of hits from central and
south-American countries who are Spanish speakers, since we have
dual-language newsbriefs.

Phil Innes

Chess Discussion 524,423
Polgar Blog 187,213
Chessgoddess 3,581,650

Non-Trolgar/News Outlets:
USCF 96,729
Chessbase 14,357


For your consideration Bowel Boy;
1. Don't flatter yourself by thinking that I care about your opinion of
me. I don't.
2. You were clearly wrong on the rankings of Chessville and ChessCafe.
3. I'm not a reflexive Sloan supporter as you are with Trolgar.

"Brian Lafferty" wrote in message
news:bilvj.15620$MY2.157@trndny07...

Here is the 'output' of someone nominated a 'judge', which is much to the
same effect as some self-styled non-Christian reverend, whatever that is,
and others who do not sport any titles to emit their 'sense' of things they
wish to 'believe' while crying down the idea of hearing everything before
coming to their own judgement of things:

For your consideration Bowel Boy;

Brian Lafferty [the judge] is presumably unaware of any Freudian
implications of his own diction, though should we assume that this is how he
conducts his courtroom in America?

1. Don't flatter yourself by thinking that I care about your opinion of
me. I don't.

I never appealed to flatter the judge. I instead wondered if he had any
sense or decency whatever

2. You were clearly wrong on the rankings of Chessville and ChessCafe.

An assertion, as usual lacking any datum. Should we think Judge Lafferty is
retired or was retired?

3. I'm not a reflexive Sloan supporter as you are with Trolgar.

I am not a supporter of anyone who does not advance chess which is also
USCF's mission. I say this in my own voice, despite the massive support of
those people who thing USCF sucks.

What the Judge says is a 'not' statement, but what the judge does is not as
he says, and the judge is shy of facing up to his 'activities' which are
everywhere banned except here - where he can say how he is, about himself,
etc.

pfft!

Phil Innes

Chess One wrote:
"Brian Lafferty" wrote in message
news:bilvj.15620$MY2.157@trndny07...

Here is the 'output' of someone nominated a 'judge', which is much to the
same effect as some self-styled non-Christian reverend, whatever that is,
and others who do not sport any titles to emit their 'sense' of things they
wish to 'believe' while crying down the idea of hearing everything before
coming to their own judgement of things:

For your consideration Bowel Boy;

Brian Lafferty [the judge] is presumably unaware of any Freudian
implications of his own diction, though should we assume that this is how he
conducts his courtroom in America?

Regrettably, I can not take full credit for your appellation. I forget
who it was, but another poster called you the Bowel of Brattleboro. I
merely adapted it to Bowel Boy--BB for short.

[Remaining bowel drippings snipped]