Chess One / Phil Innes wrote:

I am aware that this is a massive cross-posting, but rather
than it being counter agit-prop, I suggest to all readers that
what I have written seems more evidently true to me,

Phil, this is the last straw for me. You posted this to:

rec.games.chess.politics
misc.legal
rec.games.chess.misc
tx.politics
rec.games.chess.computer
alt.chess
soc.culture.usa
nyc.politics

Knowing full well that it has *NOTHING* to do with computer
chess, Texas politics, etc. Shame on you!

Welcome to my killfile.

*PLONK*

--
Guy Macon
http://www.guymacon.com/

On Feb 6, 9:23 am, Guy Macon http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote:
Chess One / Phil Innes wrote:

I am aware that this is a massive cross-posting, but rather
than it being counter agit-prop, I suggest to all readers that
what I have written seems more evidently true to me,

Phil, this is the last straw for me. You posted this to:

rec.games.chess.politics
misc.legal
rec.games.chess.misc
tx.politics
rec.games.chess.computer
alt.chess
soc.culture.usa
nyc.politics

Knowing full well that it has *NOTHING* to do with computer
chess, Texas politics, etc. Shame on you!

Welcome to my killfile.

*PLONK*

--
Guy Macon
http://www.guymacon.com/

Careful, Guy. I killfiled Innes once and he began to send me email.
Even though he never has anything to say worth listening to, he's
determined to be heard.

"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote in message
...

Careful, Guy. I killfiled Innes once and he began to send me email.
Even though he never has anything to say worth listening to, he's
determined to be heard.

He will get one polite request to not email me, and from then
on any emails will result in complaints to his email provider.
Repeated infractions will get his email provider listed on at
least one DNS Blacklist (which won't happen; they will nuke his
account rather than risk being blacklisted.

Good grief! If Macon wants to believe Brennan that's up to him - welcome to
the liars club of malicious public speculators and stalkers.

There is little need to ever refute Brennan since I might as well say
everything he offers is twisted and malicious, and seeks to cause
contention - as a default to his utterances.

PI

On Feb 7, 9:07 am, "Chess One" wrote:
"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote in message

...

Careful, Guy. I killfiled Innes once and he began to send me email.
Even though he never has anything to say worth listening to, he's
determined to be heard.

He will get one polite request to not email me, and from then
on any emails will result in complaints to his email provider.
Repeated infractions will get his email provider listed on at
least one DNS Blacklist (which won't happen; they will nuke his
account rather than risk being blacklisted.

Good grief! If Macon wants to believe Brennan that's up to him - welcome to
the liars club of malicious public speculators and stalkers.

There is little need to ever refute Brennan since I might as well say
everything he offers is twisted and malicious, and seeks to cause
contention - as a default to his utterances.

PI

Please note P Innes doesn't deny sending me email after I killfiled
his newsgroup posts.

A Google Groups user claiming to be samsloan wrote:

Guy Macon http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote:

The Historian wrote:

Guy Macon wrote:

Chess One / Phil Innes wrote:

I am aware that this is a massive cross-posting, but rather
than it being counter agit-prop, I suggest to all readers that
what I have written seems more evidently true to me,

Phil, this is the last straw for me. You posted this to:

rec.games.chess.politics
misc.legal
rec.games.chess.misc
tx.politics
rec.games.chess.computer
alt.chess
soc.culture.usa
nyc.politics

Knowing full well that it has *NOTHING* to do with computer
chess, Texas politics, etc. Shame on you!

Welcome to my killfile.

*PLONK*

--
Guy Macon
http://www.guymacon.com/

Careful, Guy. I killfiled Innes once and he began to send me email.
Even though he never has anything to say worth listening to, he's
determined to be heard.

He will get one polite request to not email me, and from then
on any emails will result in complaints to his email provider.
Repeated infractions will get his email provider listed on at
least one DNS Blacklist (which won't happen; they will nuke his
account rather than risk being blacklisted.

I am utterly terrified that you will complain to my ISP,
ishipress.com

First, ishipress is not an ISP. It is a domain. The ISP associated
with your domain (which may not be the same as the ISP you use to
send email) is NTT America.

Your Usenet post came from an Optimum Online / Cablevision Systems)
server (OOL-CPE-NYX4NY-69-120-148-0-22), via Google Groups, but
again, that doesn't mean that your email is sent through that path.

Second, "The Historian" and I were discussin Phil Innes / Chess
One, not Sam Sloan.

I notice that you are using a "remailed automatically by anonymizing
remailer software".

You appear to be able to notice things that do not exist. The post
you replied to was through the Giganews NNTP server. Please provide
a message-ID where you think you saw "remailed automatically by
anonymizing remailer software" in a post withy my name on it.

Are you one of these fakes who have been posting here recently?

I have better things to do, and if I was in the habit of doing such
things, there are far more worthy targets in certain other newsgroups.

Or, is somebody pretending to be you?

Not so far. The fact that I have chosen to not express an opinion
as to guilt or innocence in this case may have removed any motive
that happening, depending on who you assume is doing it. In
addition, I know of no anonymizing remailer that will allow someone
to post with a From line of "Guy Macon http://www.guymacon.com/".
Only a limited number of Usenet servers will allow a from line that
has no "@" in the email address field.


--
Guy Macon
http://www.guymacon.com/

The Historian wrote:

Chess One" wrote:

"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote...

Careful, Guy. I killfiled Innes once and he began to send me email.
Even though he never has anything to say worth listening to, he's
determined to be heard.

He will get one polite request to not email me, and from then
on any emails will result in complaints to his email provider.
Repeated infractions will get his email provider listed on at
least one DNS Blacklist (which won't happen; they will nuke his
account rather than risk being blacklisted.

Good grief! If Macon wants to believe Brennan that's up to him - welcome to
the liars club of malicious public speculators and stalkers.

There is little need to ever refute Brennan since I might as well say
everything he offers is twisted and malicious, and seeks to cause
contention - as a default to his utterances.

PI

Please note P Innes doesn't deny sending me email after I killfiled
his newsgroup posts.

Also, please note that I (Guy Macon) have not written anything even
hinting that I believe or disbelieve Brennan. (Or Innes, Truong,
Sloan, Polger, or anyone else; I rely on evidence, not on belief.)
The above is a red herring to draw attention away from my criticism
of Phil Innes, which is that he purposely posted off-topic material
to innapropriate newsgroups.

--
Guy Macon
http://www.guymacon.com/

On Feb 7, 1:45*pm, Guy Macon http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote:
The Historian wrote:

Chess One" wrote:

"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote...

Careful, Guy. I killfiled Innes once and he began to send me email.
Even though he never has anything to say worth listening to, he's
determined to be heard.

He will get one polite request to not email me, and from then
on any emails will result in complaints to his email provider.
Repeated infractions will get his email provider listed on at
least one DNS Blacklist (which won't happen; they will nuke his
account rather than risk being blacklisted.

Good grief! If Macon wants to believe Brennan that's up to him - welcome to
the liars club of malicious public speculators and stalkers.

There is little need to ever refute Brennan since I might as well say
everything he offers is twisted and malicious, and seeks to cause
contention - as a default to his utterances.

PI

Please note P Innes doesn't deny sending me email after I killfiled
his newsgroup posts.

Also, please note that I (Guy Macon) have not written anything even
hinting that I believe or disbelieve Brennan. (Or Innes, Truong,
Sloan, Polger, or anyone else; I rely on evidence, not on belief.)
The above is a red herring to draw attention away from my criticism
of Phil Innes, which is that he purposely posted off-topic material
to innapropriate newsgroups.

--
Guy Macon
http://www.guymacon.com/- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hi Guy,
In defense of Phil, I believe he simply hit "reply" to something
already posted by Sloan and that resulted in the posting. It's
something that I fear many of us are guilty of doing, not through
malice or purpose, but simply in a quick and expediant attempt to
respond to an online provocation.
Best Wishes,
Rob

"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote in message
...



The Historian wrote:

Chess One" wrote:

"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote...

Careful, Guy. I killfiled Innes once and he began to send me email.
Even though he never has anything to say worth listening to, he's
determined to be heard.

He will get one polite request to not email me, and from then
on any emails will result in complaints to his email provider.
Repeated infractions will get his email provider listed on at
least one DNS Blacklist (which won't happen; they will nuke his
account rather than risk being blacklisted.

Good grief! If Macon wants to believe Brennan that's up to him - welcome
to
the liars club of malicious public speculators and stalkers.

There is little need to ever refute Brennan since I might as well say
everything he offers is twisted and malicious, and seeks to cause
contention - as a default to his utterances.

PI

Please note P Innes doesn't deny sending me email after I killfiled
his newsgroup posts.

Also, please note that I (Guy Macon) have not written anything even
hinting that I believe or disbelieve Brennan. (Or Innes, Truong,
Sloan, Polger, or anyone else; I rely on evidence, not on belief.)
The above is a red herring to draw attention away from my criticism
of Phil Innes, which is that he purposely posted off-topic material
to innapropriate newsgroups.

To Legal groups on legal matters to do with chess?

If you are going to plonk someone Macon, don't make such a hero of
yourself - just buzz off! Of course, your current bravery will only be
reported to you by other people since you are so emotional - and can't ask
anyone anything about why - especially why Sam Sloan broadcast to all these
groups in the first place.

Its a big game played here, by petty people. What is big about it is that to
actual people there are consequences, and if dopes don't like it, don't tune
it. But protest it 7 times?

Just take whatever the hysterical liar Brennan says as truth, and flip out -
but PLEEEEZE - flip off.

Chess.computer is nicely eunuched, no?

Phil Innes



--
Guy Macon
http://www.guymacon.com/

"Rob" wrote in message
...
On Feb 7, 1:45 pm, Guy Macon http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote:
The Historian wrote:

Chess One" wrote:

"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote...

Careful, Guy. I killfiled Innes once and he began to send me email.
Even though he never has anything to say worth listening to, he's
determined to be heard.

He will get one polite request to not email me, and from then
on any emails will result in complaints to his email provider.
Repeated infractions will get his email provider listed on at
least one DNS Blacklist (which won't happen; they will nuke his
account rather than risk being blacklisted.

Good grief! If Macon wants to believe Brennan that's up to him -
welcome to
the liars club of malicious public speculators and stalkers.

There is little need to ever refute Brennan since I might as well say
everything he offers is twisted and malicious, and seeks to cause
contention - as a default to his utterances.

PI

Please note P Innes doesn't deny sending me email after I killfiled
his newsgroup posts.

Also, please note that I (Guy Macon) have not written anything even
hinting that I believe or disbelieve Brennan. (Or Innes, Truong,
Sloan, Polger, or anyone else; I rely on evidence, not on belief.)
The above is a red herring to draw attention away from my criticism
of Phil Innes, which is that he purposely posted off-topic material
to innapropriate newsgroups.

--
Guy Macon
http://www.guymacon.com/- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hi Guy,
In defense of Phil, I believe he simply hit "reply" to something
already posted by Sloan and that resulted in the posting. It's
something that I fear many of us are guilty of doing, not through
malice or purpose, but simply in a quick and expediant attempt to
respond to an online provocation.
Best Wishes,
Rob

Actually I usually even make a point of noticing the newsgroups I trim.
No-one else does that. In this instance, since legal issues /did/ seem to be
the topic, I /consciously/ copied the whole group.

What exactly Macon's problem is, I don't know. I rather doubt its this one


Perhaps there should be a newsgroup for chess virgins?

Phil Innes

On Feb 6, 9:32 am, The Historian wrote:

Careful, Guy. I killfiled Innes once and he began to send me email.
Even though he never has anything to say worth listening to, he's
determined to be heard.

After careful consideration by the board, your
5-year contract for "annoying Phil Innes" has
been renewed. Payment is in the mail; it's the
same amount as last time-- two boxes of used
chess trophies, and some "Trends" books from
the 1980s. (Hey, we run a tight ship here.)


-- the bored