A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

A Summation of the Trolgar Position



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 5th 08, 04:47 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
Brian Lafferty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 625
Default A Summation of the Trolgar Position

by Harry Payne, recent Chessville Forum trashee. This is taken from the
USCF Issues Forum in response to MARKNIBB.
------------------------------------------------

by Harry Payne on Wed Mar 05, 2008 9:28 am
Well, it is quite apparent you have taken up the hew and cry of Susan
and Paul completely. The Mottershead Report is wrong, because we say so.
The Majority of the "ELECTED" Executive Board is wrong, because we say
so. Any Member of the USCF that does not agree with us is wrong, because
we say so. We do not have to give any proof, or substantiate anything we
say, because we say so. The USCF should adhere to our demands, because
we say so. Every thing we say is right, because we say so.
Where does their responsibility come in to prove anything they say? Do I
see a pattern here?
The "Because we SAY SO " Syndrome :?:

Well I think they are wrong, what proof do I have.
1. The Mottershead Report
2. Two experts validating the Report
3. No Sworn Deposition from Paul.(under perjury clause)
4. The Majority of the Executive Board of the USCF showed of a lack of
"Faith and Confidence in Paul (asked to resign).
5. Paul's refusal to allow access to his ISP, History (At request of
Attorneys, who at the time where representing He and Susan , as well as
the USCF).
6. Two former supporters and friends of Paul's on the Executive Board,
voting for Paul's resignation.

Conclusion: I think they are wrong. Why ? They have not refuted, or
shown proof otherwise.
Care to list Susan and Paul's "PROOF" Mark? Not their accusations, not
their opinions, not their unproven charges. Just Their "PROOF" Mark.
---------------------------------
Rich men write the laws, that poor men must defend. But the highest laws
of any land, are written on the hearts of Honest Men.
In love of the game. Harry Payne
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help with position evaluation Vasileios Zografos rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) 11 October 24th 06 08:38 PM
Bobby Fischer has been reinstated in the USCF TomAlciere@TomAlciere.com rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 88 September 4th 06 08:02 PM
Bobby Fischer has been reinstated in the USCF TomAlciere@TomAlciere.com rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 89 September 4th 06 08:02 PM
Do GMs give a rate to a position in numbers? Artificer rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 4 January 17th 06 03:48 PM
Topalov VS Bacrot position analysis Artificer rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 11 January 17th 06 01:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Secured Loans - Mortgage - Loans - Car Insurance - Salisburgo