![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: position, summation, trolgar |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
by Harry Payne, recent Chessville Forum trashee. This is taken from the
USCF Issues Forum in response to MARKNIBB. ------------------------------------------------ by Harry Payne on Wed Mar 05, 2008 9:28 am Well, it is quite apparent you have taken up the hew and cry of Susan and Paul completely. The Mottershead Report is wrong, because we say so. The Majority of the "ELECTED" Executive Board is wrong, because we say so. Any Member of the USCF that does not agree with us is wrong, because we say so. We do not have to give any proof, or substantiate anything we say, because we say so. The USCF should adhere to our demands, because we say so. Every thing we say is right, because we say so. Where does their responsibility come in to prove anything they say? Do I see a pattern here? The "Because we SAY SO " Syndrome :?: Well I think they are wrong, what proof do I have. 1. The Mottershead Report 2. Two experts validating the Report 3. No Sworn Deposition from Paul.(under perjury clause) 4. The Majority of the Executive Board of the USCF showed of a lack of "Faith and Confidence in Paul (asked to resign). 5. Paul's refusal to allow access to his ISP, History (At request of Attorneys, who at the time where representing He and Susan , as well as the USCF). 6. Two former supporters and friends of Paul's on the Executive Board, voting for Paul's resignation. Conclusion: I think they are wrong. Why ? They have not refuted, or shown proof otherwise. Care to list Susan and Paul's "PROOF" Mark? Not their accusations, not their opinions, not their unproven charges. Just Their "PROOF" Mark. --------------------------------- Rich men write the laws, that poor men must defend. But the highest laws of any land, are written on the hearts of Honest Men. In love of the game. Harry Payne |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help with position evaluation | Vasileios Zografos | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 11 | October 24th 06 08:38 PM |
| Bobby Fischer has been reinstated in the USCF | TomAlciere@TomAlciere.com | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 88 | September 4th 06 08:02 PM |
| Bobby Fischer has been reinstated in the USCF | TomAlciere@TomAlciere.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 89 | September 4th 06 08:02 PM |
| Do GMs give a rate to a position in numbers? | Artificer | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 4 | January 17th 06 03:48 PM |
| Topalov VS Bacrot position analysis | Artificer | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 11 | January 17th 06 01:29 PM |