![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: expounds, innes, journalism, phil |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Those of us who want to take a break from discussions of serious
topics and just to enjoy a good laugh for a change need go no further that look at what our "Nearly an IM" Phil Innes says when he calls himself a "journalist" (at the genius level no less) and expounds on the subject of "Journalism". Apparently, Innes must feel that anyone who posts a lot to this group is a "journalist", as he has no other qualification. Here is what Phil Innes wrote under the topic of "20 Questions": ============================================ Do not e-mail me about business which is public. Just speak your piece here as you did before. Journalism is a little understood practice, but it is a public one. If you wish to make your views public evident, as your wrote to me in private, re-state them here. My job as journalist is not to change anyone's opinion. It is to, at genius level of operation*, shift everyone from their certainties for as much as 10 minutes of thought. Where people land from that is not my business, not should it be. The practice of journalism is to act as catalyst, not consultant. To activate the reader, not anticipate them. To stimulate the topic, not whore after any trophies. Phil Innes |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 7, 4:42*am, samsloan wrote:
Those of us who want to take a break from discussions of serious topics and just to enjoy a good laugh for a change need go no further that look at what our "Nearly an IM" Phil Innes says when he calls himself a "journalist" (at the genius level no less) and expounds on the subject of "Journalism". Apparently, Innes must feel that anyone who posts a lot to this group is a "journalist", as he has no other qualification. Here is what Phil Innes wrote under the topic of "20 Questions": ============================================ Do not e-mail me about business which is public. Just speak your piece here as you did before. Journalism is a little understood practice, but it is a public one. If you wish to make your views public evident, as your wrote to me in private, re-state them here. My job as journalist is not to change anyone's opinion. It is to, at genius level of operation*, shift everyone from their certainties for as much as 10 minutes of thought. Where people land from that is not my business, not should it be. The practice of journalism is to act as catalyst, not consultant. To activate the reader, not anticipate them. To stimulate the topic, not whore after any trophies. Phil Innes So he gave you a change to state your program and views and since you can't do that without making a personal attach, you gripe . |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 7, 12:09 pm, Rob wrote:
So he gave you a change to state your program and views and since you can't do that without making a personal attach, you gripe . Speaking of "journalism"... I noticed that while Paul Truong was allowed to rail against his unnamed adversary in the IMnes "interview", there was nothing from the other side, from the loony Sam Sloan of the Cosmic Sex Galaxy. I dunno, but this looks a lot like what they call favoritism (not "journalism"). A /real/ discussion of issues is perhaps not possible on account of the lawsuits currently in progress; but that didn't stop PT from lashing out at the real SS. One thing I noticed that these two do-gooders have in common is that they are/were powerless in the face of the sinister Bill Goichberg-- a man who apparently "runs things" on the USCF board. Instead of a supposed democracy, we seem to have a sort of oligarchy or what-have-you, in which one person basically dictates how his group of cronies will vote, and this trumps the one or two opposing board members virtually every time. The solution is obvious: the entire Evans ratpack needs to run and get elected to the board, so the BG regime will finally have a bit of competition. From then on, board meetings will be held -- not in Podunk, Iowa or some place in Tennessee -- but in Reno, Nevada! A beautiful place, with trees and /real/ mountains (not those pretenders they call the Blue Ridge "mountains"), capped with snow above the tree line. What's a tree line, you ask? It's the altitude above which the trees cannot grow, so that leaves bare rock and, of course, snow. Mountains, you see, are not those rounded-off thingies you see in the East; they are pointy, jagged peaked rocky ridges that jut upward to the sky-- the king of things you don't want to attempt climbing without a safety rope. Anyway, back to the puff-pieces which are passed off as "interviews" these days... . -- help bot |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 7, 3:15 pm, help bot wrote:
A /real/ discussion of issues is perhaps not possible on account of the lawsuits currently in progress; but that didn't stop PT from lashing out at the real SS. One thing I noticed that these two do-gooders have in common is that they are/were powerless in the face of the sinister Bill Goichberg-- a man who apparently "runs things" on the USCF board. Instead of a supposed democracy, we seem to have a sort of oligarchy or what-have-you, in which one person basically dictates how his group of cronies will vote, and this trumps the one or two opposing board members virtually every time. -- help bot You got it !!! Sam Sloan |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Rob" wrote in message ... On Mar 7, 4:42 am, samsloan wrote: Those of us who want to take a break from discussions of serious topics and just to enjoy a good laugh for a change need go no further that look at what our "Nearly an IM" Phil Innes says when he calls himself a "journalist" (at the genius level no less) and expounds on the subject of "Journalism". What really funny Rob, is that I am quoting Bron Waugh, son of Evelyn who wrote Bridehead. While Waugh is thought to have been one of the best novelists in the C20th in England, his son was thought to be the best journalist. Just to make it clear - he said journalism was not cheap propaganda, but that writing which shifted others from their fixed views, whatever they were, for as much as 10 minutes at a time. Greg Kennedy, whose ethos is that of the newsgroup hack, is only concerned with winning the opinion of others - a somewhat different scenario in offering a context to them so they can decide for themselves. He is obsessed with groups and followers, and doesn't understand how for example you and I can agree with Larry Parr about the Sloan/Truong issue. Cordially, Phil Innes Apparently, Innes must feel that anyone who posts a lot to this group is a "journalist", as he has no other qualification. Here is what Phil Innes wrote under the topic of "20 Questions": ============================================ Do not e-mail me about business which is public. Just speak your piece here as you did before. Journalism is a little understood practice, but it is a public one. If you wish to make your views public evident, as your wrote to me in private, re-state them here. My job as journalist is not to change anyone's opinion. It is to, at genius level of operation*, shift everyone from their certainties for as much as 10 minutes of thought. Where people land from that is not my business, not should it be. The practice of journalism is to act as catalyst, not consultant. To activate the reader, not anticipate them. To stimulate the topic, not whore after any trophies. Phil Innes So he gave you a change to state your program and views and since you can't do that without making a personal attach, you gripe . |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 7, 5:42 am, samsloan wrote:
Those of us who want to take a break from discussions of serious topics and just to enjoy a good laugh for a change need go no further that look at what our "Nearly an IM" Phil Innes says when he calls himself a "journalist" (at the genius level no less) and expounds on the subject of "Journalism". Apparently, Innes must feel that anyone who posts a lot to this group is a "journalist", as he has no other qualification. Here is what Phil Innes wrote under the topic of "20 Questions": I found it amusing. Thanks for reposting it. The clue that P Innes was 'borrowing' someone else's words was that the words made sense. The humor in the post is that P Innes thinks the words he 'borrowed' apply to himself. To quote Gilbert's paraphrase of an Aesop fable, "jackdaws strut in peacock's feathers." ============================================ Do not e-mail me about business which is public. Just speak your piece here as you did before. Journalism is a little understood practice, but it is a public one. If you wish to make your views public evident, as your wrote to me in private, re-state them here. My job as journalist is not to change anyone's opinion. It is to, at genius level of operation*, shift everyone from their certainties for as much as 10 minutes of thought. Where people land from that is not my business, not should it be. The practice of journalism is to act as catalyst, not consultant. To activate the reader, not anticipate them. To stimulate the topic, not whore after any trophies. Phil Innes |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Chess Politics Chess Heretics | Chess One | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 28 | December 24th 06 04:36 AM |
| Keene reviews Kingston (part 1) | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 443 | June 11th 06 10:30 AM |
| Keene reviews Kingston (part 1) | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 445 | June 11th 06 10:30 AM |
| Why are the Hardinge-Simpole titles priced the way they are? | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 160 | January 10th 06 02:25 PM |
| Why are the Hardinge-Simpole titles priced the way they are? | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 163 | January 10th 06 02:25 PM |