![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: been, bridge, contract, has, louis, outline, printers, sent, tothe, watson |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Late last night I sent "The Outline of Contract Bridge" by Louis H.
Watson to the printers for reprinting. It should be out and available for sale in ten days to two weeks. When it comes out it will be available on Amazon at: http://www.amazon.com/dp/092389182X Does anybody have the dust cover for this book and for the other Watson Book "Watson on the Play of the Hand"? I have several copies of these books but only the hard cover book, not the dust cover. I really need the dust cover to make my own cover. After that comes out I will also be reprinting the next Watson book, which will appear at: http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891749 I know that if I were going to start playing bridge again, I would read Watson's "Outline of Contract Bridge" first, for the simple reason that it is short enough to digest. The section on The Play of the Hand is only 149 pages and I could get through that much more easily than the 492 page longer book. Sam Sloan http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891943 |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
samsloan wrote:
Late last night I sent "The Outline of Contract Bridge" by Louis H. Watson to the printers for reprinting. It should be out and available for sale in ten days to two weeks. When it comes out it will be available on Amazon at: http://www.amazon.com/dp/092389182X Does anybody have the dust cover for this book and for the other Watson Book "Watson on the Play of the Hand"? I have several copies of these books but only the hard cover book, not the dust cover. I really need the dust cover to make my own cover. After that comes out I will also be reprinting the next Watson book, which will appear at: http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891749 I know that if I were going to start playing bridge again, I would read Watson's "Outline of Contract Bridge" first, for the simple reason that it is short enough to digest. The section on The Play of the Hand is only 149 pages and I could get through that much more easily than the 492 page longer book. Sam Sloan http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891943 Uh, you realise "Play of the Hand" is still in-print, right? -- |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 22, 5:40 pm, "Tyler Eaves" wrote:
samsloan wrote: Late last night I sent "The Outline of Contract Bridge" by Louis H. Watson to the printers for reprinting. It should be out and available for sale in ten days to two weeks. When it comes out it will be available on Amazon at: http://www.amazon.com/dp/092389182X Does anybody have the dust cover for this book and for the other Watson Book "Watson on the Play of the Hand"? I have several copies of these books but only the hard cover book, not the dust cover. I really need the dust cover to make my own cover. After that comes out I will also be reprinting the next Watson book, which will appear at: http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891749 I know that if I were going to start playing bridge again, I would read Watson's "Outline of Contract Bridge" first, for the simple reason that it is short enough to digest. The section on The Play of the Hand is only 149 pages and I could get through that much more easily than the 492 page longer book. Sam Sloan http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891943 Uh, you realise "Play of the Hand" is still in-print, right? -- What is "in print" is "Watson's Classic Book on the Play of the Hand at Bridge By Louis H. Watson New Edition Enlarged and Modernized by Sam Fry, Jr." published in 1958 by Sterling Publishing Co. Inc. That book is entirely different from the book that I am reprinting, which is entitled "The Outline of Contract Bridge: Part I Contract Bidding, Part II The Play of the Hand". Not a single word is the same. In addition, the 1958 book says © 1958 by Sterling Publishing Co., Inc. That is a false copyright notice. I know this because I have encountered another "copyright" by Sterling Publishing Co., Inc., which turned out just to be a copy of a book published in the Soviet Union in 1923 by an author who had died in the Soviet Union in 1942. Sam Sloan |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know that if I were going to start playing bridge again, I would read Watson's "Outline of Contract Bridge" first because you are aware of its existence. Most newcomers to the game of bridge won't recognize the name Louis Watson any more than they will the name Kenneth Harkness, and, preferring new books to old as you note so many people do, my guess is that they will buy the books their friends or teachers recommend, or they will browse at the local Borders or B&N and find something there rather than take a chance on publishers' blurbs on Amazon. The reviews that will come out in Bridge Bulletin and The Bridge World and perhaps other magazines (you have sent out or will be sending out review copies of your titles of course) may help, though a survey commissioned by ACBL a couple of years back found that the vast majority of bridge players in the US had never heard of ACBL, so they would not see the Bulletin review-to-be anyway. Otherwise I'm just not clear on how your intended customers will encounter your products. The good news is that the market doesn't much care what I or any other individual consumer thinks. Only time will tell. David |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 23, 1:24 am, David Babcock wrote:
I know that if I were going to start playing bridge again, I would read Watson's "Outline of Contract Bridge" first because you are aware of its existence. Most newcomers to the game of bridge won't recognize the name Louis Watson any more than they will the name Kenneth Harkness, and, preferring new books to old as you note so many people do, my guess is that they will buy the books their friends or teachers recommend, or they will browse at the local Borders or B&N and find something there rather than take a chance on publishers' blurbs on Amazon. The reviews that will come out in Bridge Bulletin and The Bridge World and perhaps other magazines (you have sent out or will be sending out review copies of your titles of course) may help, though a survey commissioned by ACBL a couple of years back found that the vast majority of bridge players in the US had never heard of ACBL, so they would not see the Bulletin review-to-be anyway. Otherwise I'm just not clear on how your intended customers will encounter your products. The good news is that the market doesn't much care what I or any other individual consumer thinks. Only time will tell. David Thank you for your helpful suggestions. The truth is that I never heard of Louis Watson myself until a few weeks ago. I always thought that Charles Goren was the World's Greatest Bridge Player. Silly me!! It was my old friend Richard Laver, a chess master and Math Professor at the University of Colorado who played as my bridge partner 40 years ago, who started writing me about these Watson books upon learning that I had recently restarted my publishing company, The Ishi Press (that underwent a hiatus of 10 years without publishing any new books). Due to the wonders of new print-on-demand technology if I can just sell around 20 to 30 books I will break even and thus far almost all of my books have done that with the notable exception with the Kenneth Harkness book "Invitation to Bridge". I have published 34 books in the past year and a half. If you ever get to see one of them, you will see that the print and production qualities are superior to the original books. (By the way, do not believe my long time detractors such as "Rob" and "Jeron" who will try to tell you that I make my books at Kinko Copies. I use a very high quality printer.) The serious bridge players will know that Louis Watson was a great player who tragically died in 1936 at age 29 and whose books are still studied today by all the top players. That is where I hope my market to be. Sam Sloan |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I can assure you that I have studied the subject, I know copyright law
very well, and I have consulted with the Copyright Office and the Library of Congress in Washington DC. I know what I am doing. Sam Sloan |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
samsloan wrote:
I can assure you that I have studied the subject, I know copyright law very well, and I have consulted with the Copyright Office and the Library of Congress in Washington DC. I know what I am doing. For certain values of "know what [you] are doing." Republishing Kenneth Harkness's trivial re-presentation of Culbertson, a book of little interest in its time and almost none now, republishing Watson's _outline of Contract Bridge_, which even you suggest ignoring half of, a half that is a minimalist rehashing of Culbertson's books; republishing the unexpanded and uncorrected version of Watson's _Play of the Hand_: all these suggest that you haven't a clue what you are doing. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 25, 1:10 am, Martin Ambuhl wrote:
samsloan wrote: I can assure you that I have studied the subject, I know copyright law very well, and I have consulted with the Copyright Office and the Library of Congress in Washington DC. I know what I am doing. For certain values of "know what [you] are doing." Republishing Kenneth Harkness's trivial re-presentation of Culbertson, a book of little interest in its time and almost none now, republishing Watson's _outline of Contract Bridge_, which even you suggest ignoring half of, a half that is a minimalist rehashing of Culbertson's books; republishing the unexpanded and uncorrected version of Watson's _Play of the Hand_: all these suggest that you haven't a clue what you are doing. Sorry, but you are mistaken. The book, Invitation to Bridge by Kenneth Harkness, is not a "trivial re-presentation of Culbertson". It has nothing to do with the Culbertson System. The term "honor tricks" is never mentioned in the Harkness book. Rather, the Harkness book is one of the very first books to introduce the "Goren Standard American" system of bidding. The system under which Ace = 4, King = 3, Queen = 2 and Jack = 1 is introduced on page 72 of the Harkness Book. Also, Harkness was a professional writer who happened to play bridge, as opposed to other authors who were professional bridge players who happened to write too. Harkness worked as a writer and editor of radio articles and textbooks before he got involved in chess and bridge. I am not qualified to make a comparison but I would imagine that his explanations are easier to read and understand than that of other writers. Regarding "The Outline of Contract Bridge", I briefly considered reprinting just the part that deals with The Play of the Hand for which Watson is famous, but since the play of the hand is affected by the bidding, I had to leave that in. Also, as Watson points out, there is a best contract for every deal and in principle every correct bidding system should reach the same contract. Of course, we realize that this is just in theory, as in practice it does not work out that way. I have been through every page of the original 1934 book "Watson on the Play of the Hand at Contract Bridge" and compared it with the 1958 update by Sam Fry and I am unable to find any changes at all in the text. Sam Fry just added 12 pages at the end, which is the equivalent of two or three issues of a daily newspaper column. Sam Fry also added footnotes to the bottom of some of the pages, but I am unable to find any other changes. The original Watson book was not even retyped. It was just a photocopy of the original. When my book comes out next week, you will be able to see clearly that my books are much better. The fonts will be larger, clearer and easier to read. The pages will be blown up and bigger. I took several of my new books to Foxwoods this past weekend and everybody who saw them agreed that the print quality is superior to that of the original books. Sam Sloan http://www.amazon.com/dp/092389182X http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891749 http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891943 |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
samsloan wrote:
On Mar 25, 1:10 am, Martin Ambuhl wrote: samsloan wrote: I can assure you that I have studied the subject, I know copyright law very well, and I have consulted with the Copyright Office and the Library of Congress in Washington DC. I know what I am doing. For certain values of "know what [you] are doing." Republishing Kenneth Harkness's trivial re-presentation of Culbertson, a book of little interest in its time and almost none now, republishing Watson's _outline of Contract Bridge_, which even you suggest ignoring half of, a half that is a minimalist rehashing of Culbertson's books; republishing the unexpanded and uncorrected version of Watson's _Play of the Hand_: all these suggest that you haven't a clue what you are doing. Sorry, but you are mistaken. The book, Invitation to Bridge by Kenneth Harkness, is not a "trivial re-presentation of Culbertson". It has nothing to do with the Culbertson System. The term "honor tricks" is never mentioned in the Harkness book. Again proving you haven't a clue. 1) An evaluation technique is not a bidding system. 2) Ely Culbertson published books using point-count evaluation, and after his death his wife Jo taught point-count evaluation exclusively. "Culbertson" and "honor tricks" by no means imply each other 3) Goren's methods of 1950 were nothing more than Culbertson's with a short-suit count for distribution instead of the exactly equivalent long-suit count the Culbertsons were using, but with additional conceptual errors. Rather, the Harkness book is one of the very first books to introduce the "Goren Standard American" system of bidding. This is simply a lie. You have been told, for example, of Goren's _Point Count Bidding_ (a year before Harkness) _Standard Book of Bidding_ (6 years before Harkness) _Contract Bridge in a Nutshell_ (4 years before Harkness) _Contract Bridge Complete_ (8 years before Harkness) And all of the last three had gone through at least two editions (the last through 4) before Harkness's book. You have been told this; you ignored it; now you lie pretending that it isn't true. Further, Goren was a real champion. Harkness was not. Goren's writing was extremely accessible, and has the virtue of being the real thing. Why would anyone bother with Harkness's completely inconsequential scribblings? The system under which Ace = 4, King = 3, Queen = 2 and Jack = 1 is introduced on page 72 of the Harkness Book. And page 1 of Goren's _Contract Bridge Complete_. What's your point? As I said, you haven't a damn clue. You don't know anything about bridge, the history of bidding systems, or the history of bridge publication. You clearly have no idea about what is worth reprinting. You are attempting to fool the few people more clueless than yourself. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
the Harkness book is one of the very first books to introduce the "Goren Standard American" system of bidding. The system under which Ace = 4, King = 3, Queen = 2 and Jack = 1 is introduced on page 72 of the Harkness Book. From Milton's Work's _Contract Bridge_ (1927): "Reckon an Ace as 4, a King as 3, a Queen as 2, and a Jack as 1." (p. 28). On a related matter, I have spoken with Amazon about the misattribution of the authorship of the Harkness reprint to Goren in the listing on their site; their customer support representative appreciated the information, repeated everything back to me (at his suggestion), and said he is forwarding the information to a supervisor. Perhaps Mr. Sloan's hope that the error will be corrected is just a bit closer to realization. David |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Watson on "The Outline of Contract Bridge" | samsloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 0 | March 21st 08 05:33 AM |
| Watson on "The Outline of Contract Bridge" | samsloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | March 21st 08 05:33 AM |
| Watson on "The Outline of Contract Bridge" | samsloan | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 0 | March 21st 08 05:33 AM |
| Elo on Fischer's conditions vs. Karpov | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 216 | November 27th 06 02:48 AM |
| Why is poker getting so much attention and not chess? | Alberich | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 68 | February 15th 06 09:08 AM |