![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: 2003, open, statistics, world |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
That was a really strong open section this past week. There were over
35 GMs playing. I think there was a 10 way tie for first place so each person wins almost $3000. What is interesting is that the GMs that got 11th - 20th place will only get $80 since they have to pay their entry fee. I am sure Goicherg is very happy with this turnout. I somehow feel this format is not really as good as it looks. It has really high prize money but in order to win $14000, you have to be on top of a really strong playing field. In the end, it just seems there is always a log jam and everyone comes home empty handed. I think Goichberg is a very smart man and all those chess players that pay $200 are fools. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ivan wrote:
That was a really strong open section this past week. There were over 35 GMs playing. I think there was a 10 way tie for first place so each person wins almost $3000. What is interesting is that the GMs that got 11th - 20th place will only get $80 since they have to pay their entry fee. I am sure Goicherg is very happy with this turnout. I somehow feel this format is not really as good as it looks. It has really high prize money but in order to win $14000, you have to be on top of a really strong playing field. In the end, it just seems there is always a log jam and everyone comes home empty handed. I think Goichberg is a very smart man and all those chess players that pay $200 are fools. Six of the 10 first place finishers drew their last round games with each other. If just one of those three games had resulted in a decision, someone would have gone home with the big pot of gold. I would say, these GMs had the opportunity to succeed, but failed. This does not make them fools in my eyes. The GMs, of course pay no entry fees unless they win cash, and as for all the class players who actually paid to enter, if they got 9 rounds of strong competition, then they got what they paid for. This does not make them fools in my eyes. Are there any rival organizations offering such strong tournaments with *lower* entry fees? If so, how often? If not, what's your beef? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ivan" wrote:
.... all those chess players that pay $200 are fools. .... If they are paying because they hope to win money, I agree with you completely. If they are paying in order to see some great players, have a good time, and play some interesting chess (the best way to do the latter is to PLAY UP a section), then they are probably getting what they are paying for. In all these tournaments, there are entirely too many of the fools who regard their entry fees as a short-term investment. It almost never pans out. Bill Smythe |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| deep fritz 8 vs shredder 704 | Blackbeard's Ghost | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 30 | January 24th 04 08:25 PM |
| Open Championship Computer-Roshambo 2003 (3rd call) | Jeroen Donkers | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 0 | August 15th 03 12:22 PM |
| 2003 World Open Statistics | Ivan | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 1 | July 8th 03 02:32 AM |
| Teddy Coleman, 13, Great Sensation of the World Open | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 0 | July 7th 03 05:12 PM |
| Teddy Coleman, 13, Great Sensation of the World Open | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 0 | July 7th 03 05:10 PM |