On Apr 25, 6:19 am, Rob wrote:

I don't think your posting phony recommendations of unlicensed drugs
to newsgroups makes me a fool. Rather, it makes you something
loathsome.

You got caught. You fell for it. You proved to everyone you are an
internet troll. But thats okay.

Better you calling me a troll than the world calling you a spammer:

*************************
Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newshub.sdsu.e du!elnk-nf2-
pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthl ink.net!
stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.atl. earthlink.net.POSTED!
b435ce59!not-for-mail
Reply-To: "Patricia Heil"
From: "Patricia Heil"
Newsgroups: alt.support.diet
References: .com
Subject: New Gastric Bypass Pill
Lines: 21
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: et
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 01:58:41 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 165.247.86.174
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net 1140919121 165.247.86.174
(Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:58:41 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:58:41 PST
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net


wrote in message
oups.com...
Does anyone know anything about this pill? It sounds like it may be
useful but before I try it I wanted to see if anyone else had heard of
it.

Here is the link:

http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/aft...ww.zetacap.com

I had to copy it like this because I dont know how to post a hyperlink,
sorry.

Thanks for your help.
Rob


If this isn't fraud I don't know what is.

********************

Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.c om!
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!
local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!new s.comcast.com.POSTED!
not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:51:50 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.support.diet
Subject: New Gastric Bypass Pill
From: Andy q
References: .com
Organization: CotD
Message-ID:
User-Agent: Xnews/2005.10.18
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:51:50 -0600
Lines: 26
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.32.207.112
X-Trace: sv3-obV4E5Ix3R
+ECo7fdgatYxZQe90ZInkxk8GFBCxaojgERwaTb2B0a1oyTgVR Cv298FenqJXAWUCMUaF!
ifa8iMQKXAHwlNGCcdSCbFgJIe40IJRdEJJzeY2UZBvxoMNR5R X/d1rNfxIR08Jb30m/fgQ
+/Xs=
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32

wrote in
oups.com:

Does anyone know anything about this pill? It sounds like it may be
useful but before I try it I wanted to see if anyone else had heard of
it.

Here is the link:

http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/aft...u=http://www.z
etacap.com

I had to copy it like this because I dont know how to post a
hyperlink, sorry.

You know how to spam but you don't know www.tinyurl.com?


If it's not sold at the market or pharmacy, I'm not buying.

That famous claim "NOT SOLD IN STORES!" is not a blessing of a
product.

Imho,

Andy
************

Ignoramus12893 wrote:
you should disclose that you are an affiliate spammer for zetacap.

i
***************

On Apr 25, 6:35*am, The Historian wrote:
On Apr 25, 6:19 am, Rob wrote:

I don't think your posting phony recommendations of unlicensed drugs
to newsgroups makes me a fool. Rather, it makes you something
loathsome.

You got caught. You fell for it. You proved to everyone you are an
internet troll. But thats okay.

Better you calling me a troll than the world calling you a spammer:


Tisk-Tisk

The world calls you a troll. LOL

Now..... about your retraction?

On Apr 25, 11:18 am, Rob wrote:


Now..... about your retraction?

There is no need for one, except in your tortured little mind.

Nor does he need to recant....

All this deflection won't save your hero Bob Bennett.l

On Apr 25, 12:14*pm, SBD wrote:
On Apr 25, 11:18 am, Rob wrote:



Now..... about your retraction?

There is no need for one, except in your tortured little mind.

Nor does he need to recant....

All this deflection won't save your hero Bob Bennett.l

Stephen,
Neil said he did not attack nor did he want to attack Susan, Paul or
Phil. I don't know why he included Phil into his comment. It certainly
wasn't something I requested. I pointed out he coined the term
"Trollgar". My implication that his creation of the term and his
promotion of it's usage was deliberatly ment as a derogatory term. He
then implied he didn't start the term. At which point I produced his
online admission that he created the term.

I do not understand why others have such a difficult time following
that. Maybe it is something that has become such a second natured knee
jerk reaction that any statement provided by certain posters will be
attacked simply because the information comes from them? I don't know
but it sure seems like that to me.

I believe one can find evidence that I have supported and disagreed
with postings of people on both sides. That exception I think is Jason
Repa, who I have never agreed with. For months I and a few others have
been saying that there is alot of stuff that isn't know about whats
happening with the Mottershead/FSS deal. I said that for the
reputations of all involved it is best not to speculate on it in
public. I was condemned for making this suggestion and belittled and
poked fun at. Now that Jerry has been advised of only the smallest
part of what is there; he admits that there are things going on that
can explain alot but that should not be made public. People say, "We
believe you,now".

My throwing all the Chess Cafe' folks into one group was unfair. They
should all be judged on the merits of their convictions. That does not
excuse those who deserve the condemnation. Rather than trying to
single them out one by one I would prefer to say recognizing them is
like recognizing pornography. It's hard to give it a defination but
you know it when you see it.

I never ment to offend you Stephen. I do not wish to engage in
negative discourse with you.
Rob

On Apr 24, 10:51 pm, Rob wrote:

I set a trap for you Neil because I knew your reputation as a cyber
stalker. That is the one you found most quickly. And your belief of it
made you the fool. Yes, My whole family has been on Prozac. But.. I
sold Prozac and Prozac was transported to Illinois. Eventually you
will find my other crumbs I scattered over the internet. I can hardly
wait :-)


That's entrapment. You can't use evidence based on
entrapment, because *you* have crafted the crime.

Imagine that I am walking down the street, when Bill
Gates' limo cruises past. The trunk is not fully closed,
and after hitting a bump in the road, a briefcase falls
out onto the ground. The car drives away, and as I
come up to the case, I notice it is a jumbo-sized
Samsonite-- probably BG's suitcase, filled with
clothes, I expect. Upon toting it home, I discover that
it is actually filled with unmarked one-thousand dollar
bills. After several days of counting, I determine that
the total amount is in the billions, so I can't deposit it
all in one bank, or the FDIC will not insure it all. Long
story short, they track me down and throw me in jail
for "stealing" funds allegedly earmarked for the Bill
and Melinda Gates Foundation-- a nice PR twist for
Mr. Gates, who secretly was funneling money out of
the country into one of his many offshore accounts.

Of course, that was just a story-- I would never be so
stupid as to put the money I found in a bank, creating
a paper trail. In fact, it's safe and sound, stuffed inside
my mattress at home. Nobody but me will ever even
suspect I found it (except maybe a few imbeciles who
waste their time reading and posting to rgc... ).

Anyway, back to the subject, which was this: who
has more money-- me, or Marcus Roberts? I think
you now know the answer to that question.


-- help bot