On Apr 21, 10:56*am, SBD wrote:
On Apr 20, 11:10 am, Rob wrote:

- Show quoted text -

Good. Taylor Kingston says he does not oppose Susan and Paul. I was
wrong.
Rob Mitchell



Taylor is a collective?

Not sure if he is a collective... a borg maybe! :-) "resistence is
futile" His chess is very good, and "Borg like" But Mr. Bot knows more
of the Borg than I.

Still havn't heard from any oth the others so, all I can say is Taylor
is clean.

On Apr 20, 12:14 pm, Brian Lafferty wrote:

Come on BB, tell us what state board dealing with child welfare you sat
on. Unless you were lying, in which case I understand your failing to
address the question.

I wonder if this was the same body which granted
Mr. Innes the title of nearly-an-IM, along with his
claimed 2450 rating? If in fact the organization
dealt only with children, that could explain how he
earned the title, and why the rating was so high in
relation to his real results against adults.


-- help bot

On Apr 21, 12:14 pm, Rob wrote:

Good. Taylor Kingston says he does not oppose Susan and Paul. I was
wrong.

Taylor is a collective?

Not sure if he is a collective... a borg maybe! :-) "resistence is
futile" His chess is very good, and "Borg like" But Mr. Bot knows more
of the Borg than I.

Still havn't heard from any oth the others so, all I can say is Taylor
is clean.


Mr. Mitchell, there is a fellow on these newsgroups
who has a well-earned reputation for routinely
spouting false claims, after which his many critics
routinely shoot him down, time and time again. We
all know who he is (except SS himself, of course),
so I won't mention his name.
Be careful, or you will soon become like a little
brother to him. In your quest to lend support to Dr.
Phil IMnes, you keep getting roped in, more and
more... .


-- help bot

On Apr 21, 12:14*pm, Rob wrote:
On Apr 21, 10:56*am, SBD wrote:

On Apr 20, 11:10 am, Rob wrote:

- Show quoted text -

Good. Taylor Kingston says he does not oppose Susan and Paul. I was
wrong.
Rob Mitchell
Taylor is a collective?

Not sure if he is a collective... a borg maybe! :-) "resistence is
futile" His chess is very good, and "Borg like"

No, I am not of the Borg. I am the God of Hell-fi

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOErZuzZpS8

On Apr 21, 1:37*pm, wrote:
On Apr 21, 12:14*pm, Rob wrote:

On Apr 21, 10:56*am, SBD wrote:

On Apr 20, 11:10 am, Rob wrote:

- Show quoted text -

Good. Taylor Kingston says he does not oppose Susan and Paul. I was
wrong.
Rob Mitchell
Taylor is a collective?

Not sure if he is a collective... a borg maybe! :-) "resistence is
futile" His chess is very good, and "Borg like"

* No, I am not of the Borg. I am the God of Hell-fi

* *http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOErZuzZpS8

LOL

On Apr 20, 12:10 am, Rob wrote:
If I am wrong about anyones desire to attack Ms.
Polgar, Mr. Truong or Mr. Innes; then let them confess their support
publicly and I will withdraw my charges and admit my error.

I do not have a desire to "attack" Ms. Polgar, Mr. Truong, or Mr. P
Innes. Nor do I consider myself to have done so. We await you
withdrawing your 'charges' and your admission of error.

Neil the Chess Cafe writer.

On Apr 20, 12:10 am, Rob wrote:
If I am wrong about anyones desire to attack Ms.

Polgar, Mr. Truong or Mr. Innes; then let them confess their support
publicly and I will withdraw my charges and admit my error.


Confess their support?

All they have to do is show they don't attack them as you state, or is
this one of those Southern, "If you ain't fer us, you're agi'n us"
mentalities? Jeesh.

On Apr 23, 10:52 am, SBD wrote:
On Apr 20, 12:10 am, Rob wrote:

If I am wrong about anyones desire to attack Ms.

Polgar, Mr. Truong or Mr. Innes; then let them confess their support
publicly and I will withdraw my charges and admit my error.

Confess their support?

All they have to do is show they don't attack them as you state, or is
this one of those Southern, "If you ain't fer us, you're agi'n us"
mentalities? Jeesh.

It's not confined to the South, SBD.

On Apr 23, 10:41*am, The Historian
wrote:
On Apr 20, 12:10 am, Rob wrote:
*If I am wrong about anyones desire to attack Ms.

Polgar, Mr. Truong or Mr. Innes; then let them confess their support
publicly and I will withdraw my charges and admit my error.

I do not have a desire to "attack" Ms. Polgar, Mr. Truong, or Mr. P
Innes. Nor do I consider myself to have done so. We await you
withdrawing your 'charges' and your admission of error.

Neil the Chess Cafe writer.

Neil,
Since you have boasted of coining the derogatory term "Trolgar" then
for me to admit that I was wrong in my judgement of you, I would
expect you to apologize for coining ,using and promoting the term. If
and when that is done then I will admit I was wrong about you.
Rob

On Apr 23, 11:35 am, Rob wrote:
On Apr 23, 10:41 am, The Historian
wrote:

On Apr 20, 12:10 am, Rob wrote:
If I am wrong about anyones desire to attack Ms.

Polgar, Mr. Truong or Mr. Innes; then let them confess their support
publicly and I will withdraw my charges and admit my error.

I do not have a desire to "attack" Ms. Polgar, Mr. Truong, or Mr. P
Innes. Nor do I consider myself to have done so. We await you
withdrawing your 'charges' and your admission of error.

Neil the Chess Cafe writer.

Neil,
Since you have boasted of coining the derogatory term "Trolgar" then
for me to admit that I was wrong in my judgement of you, I would
expect you to apologize for coining ,using and promoting the term. If
and when that is done then I will admit I was wrong about you.
Rob

But it doesn't appear I've coined the term, nor does it appear to be
derogatory. Read Chess Bitch by Jen Shahade.

Neil the Chess Cafe writer