![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: computer, crashed, parrs |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 27, 4:14 pm, wrote:
On May 27, 1:30 pm, "J.D. Walker" wrote: Ah! Excellent. I would much rather read about WWI and possibly how it impacted leading players of the day than say GetClub. Did we lose any very promising talents in combat? I am not aware of any really prominent or promising chess masters of that time who died in combat, though likely some did. The Berlin champion, Erich Cohn, was killed late in the war. He was probably not destined for GM status because of ill health (though why he would be in the army in that case I don't know, but he enlisted in 1914 according to Marshall) but he won some strong short events. There was another Cohn playing about this time, but he died in 1913. German master Siegbert Tarrasch lost a son in the war. Worse, I believe he lost three sons during the war. Only one was killed in combat (if I can believe internet sources). One killed himself, and another died accidentally. Rudolf Spielmann served in the Austro-Hungarian Army. As did Tartakower, who also served with the free French in WW II. Once when I had far too much time on my hands I did a plot of chess player death dates. There was quite an obvious peak in the early 1940s, but nothing that significant from 1914-1918, though my data source was not comprehensive. William Hyde |
| Ads |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 27, 1:30 pm, "J.D. Walker" wrote:
Ah! Excellent. I would much rather read about WWI and possibly how it impacted leading players of the day than say GetClub. This is a false dilemma; you can have both (or neither). Did we lose any very promising talents in combat? If by "talents" Mr. Walker means chess talents, I have yet to see any chess-related discussion between the two hypothetical-Great War commentators. Instead, the focus, unsurprisingly, seems to be on Nazis, Commies, and such. Were any celebrated military minds also good chess players? Napolean Bonaparte perhaps, although both I and Sanny could likely have beaten him like carrots at chess. In one of the many newsletters I receive regularly, there was some discussion about the number of deaths in various wars which involved the USA (yes, really). I was a bit surprised at how few men were killed in some wars, but mainly by the fact that the Civil War entailed the greatest losses of them all, and by a wide margin. But alas, there were no Nazis or Commies in that one, so the pundits will quite naturally be left speechless as to the hypothetical possibilities of other outcomes. -- help bot |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 27, 4:45 pm, "J.D. Walker" wrote:
Thanks for the information. I realize other things are going to be discussed, but I thought perhaps I could nudge the discussion just a bit towards some of the chess aspects also. Alright, I will sit back down in the peanut gallery now. I never had the time to study WWI in the past. You have no idea just how lucky you are. Those of us who lived through the Great War -- like Larry Parr and myself -- are still haunted by images of trench warfare (you're better off not knowing much about that) and machine-gun fire "mowing down" men like so much overgrown grass. Trust me when I say that the modern methods of killing and maiming people are much superior, apart from a few minor exceptions like, say, agent orange. Oh well, back to the hypothetical outcomes and how the world might look. You do realize that even today, with powerful computer models, the experts cannot reliably predict the weather; obviously, the potential outcomes of different scenarios in the Great War are far more complex than that... . -- help bot |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 28, 12:16 am, " wrote:
SPONTANEOUS REPAIR? I wrote incorrectly that my computer email had been repaired. So far as I can determine, it repaired itself. Is there such a thing as spontaneous computer tissue repair? Several of you are computer mavens. Let me describe what happened. A couple of weeks back or so, the texts on my computer screen were wiped out for both incoming messages and everything in the various boxes. The address headers remained, so I knew who was sending me messages. I could also send out messages, though not easily. I could not make attachments, and I could not send return messages or forward anything. I could only hit the compose button and send out a message. Then, yesterday, everything was okay. The fellow who was going to fix the computer never showed up (death in the family) over the last several days. So nothing by way of repair was done. Any idea what happened? It sounds like LP might have a problem known as "Microsoft Windows". On my computer, sometimes I cannot type an apostrophe without the browser commandeering my machine, opening a pop-up box into which I am presumably to type something. But I never selected this option, nor had any opportunity to un-select it. The next day the problem might go away on its own, but it always returns, sooner or later. There are also occasional bog-downs where my machine gets really slow for no apparent reason-- quite unresponsive for a time only to, once again, apparently fix itself. Maybe Bill Gates was right after all; maybe there really is no advantage to a graphical user interface... . -- help bot |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... SPONTANEOUS REPAIR? I wrote incorrectly that my computer email had been repaired. So far as I can determine, it repaired itself. Is there such a thing as spontaneous computer tissue repair? Several of you are computer mavens. Let me describe what happened. If you want anybody to help you, you should, at minimum, reveal which OS you are running, which email program, which news reader etc. The problem is not a hardware malfunction. A couple of weeks back or so, the texts on my computer screen were wiped out for both incoming messages and everything in the various boxes. The address headers remained, so I knew who was sending me messages. Most likely the traffic coming and going from your machine is being monitored and the tap was done amateurishly. I could also send out messages, though not easily. I could not make attachments, and I could not send return messages or forward anything. I could only hit the compose button and send out a message. Then, yesterday, everything was okay. The I would guess that, having read your messages complaining about the problems, your supervisors realized that the tap had to be fixed and they now took care of that. It is also possible that there is a global policy on filtering information in Malaysia and they had some problems setting this up; i.e. it isn't your correspondence that is being targeted specifically. fellow who was going to fix the computer never showed up (death in the family) over the last several days. So nothing by way of repair was done. Any idea what happened? Yours, Larry Parr |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
I AM DEEPLY WOUNDED
Alright, I will sit back down in the peanut gallery now. I never had the time to study WWI in the past. -- (JDW) You have no idea just how lucky you are. Those of us who lived through the Great War -- like Larry Parr and myself... -- Greg Kennedy (help bot) As Greg Kennedy put the matter, "like Larry Parr and myself." The man has finally drawn blood. I am deeply wounded. And, to be sure, there is no "Alright." Concerning the rest of the idiotic chatter, General Haig, if he had been concerned about the Marxists and the like, would have favored stopping the war as did Lord Lansdowne. Leftish writers such as H.G. Wells screamed that Lansdowne was more concerned about social revolution than the Huns. Yours, Larry Parr help bot wrote: On May 27, 4:45 pm, "J.D. Walker" wrote: Thanks for the information. I realize other things are going to be discussed, but I thought perhaps I could nudge the discussion just a bit towards some of the chess aspects also. Alright, I will sit back down in the peanut gallery now. I never had the time to study WWI in the past. You have no idea just how lucky you are. Those of us who lived through the Great War -- like Larry Parr and myself -- are still haunted by images of trench warfare (you're better off not knowing much about that) and machine-gun fire "mowing down" men like so much overgrown grass. Trust me when I say that the modern methods of killing and maiming people are much superior, apart from a few minor exceptions like, say, agent orange. Oh well, back to the hypothetical outcomes and how the world might look. You do realize that even today, with powerful computer models, the experts cannot reliably predict the weather; obviously, the potential outcomes of different scenarios in the Great War are far more complex than that... . -- help bot |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
GENERAL HAIG
Are you being deliberately obtuse or is my point so profound, shocking & unthinkable as not to have occurred to you? Namely, why should Haig seek to curtail what effectively was the culling of a generation of those young males most likely influenced by international political upheaval to the detriment of the class he represented (ie the ruling class)? Or, are you so naive you consider Gen. Haig some sort of benign, cuddly, Baden-Powellish, father figure?.. -- Nobody WWI wiped out entire colleges of the Oxbridge crowd, which at the start and far into the war were absolutely loyal. The percentage rate of attrition for those upper class types was higher than for the lower classes. Once again, a great memoir to read for what happened to higher society is Vera Brittain's "Testament of Youth." For our anonymouse, you might try C. S. Forrester's "The General" for an understanding of Douglas Haig. Yes, by the author of the Hornblower books -- and a serious novel by any standards. For a defense of the hideous Haig, you won't do better than John Buchan's four volume history of WWI (not his Nelson's War series of about 26 volumes, if memory serves). It hurts to bring up Buchan, whom one cannot help to admire in many ways for his 190 or so IQ and ceaseless Presbyterian industry. But he had the class solidarity with his level of society when the going was toughest. There is an essay on Buchan in The New Criterion. It is very well done and can be found somewhere on the Internet. His student career at Oxford defies explanation for its sheer brilliance. He was possibly the greatest of the late Victorian and Edwardian geniuses. He died in 1940, while serving as Governor General of Canada. Readers of this forum may remember him as the author of The 39 Steps, which Alfred Hitchcock made into a famous film. It is about the least of his novels. For aspiring minds, I recommend Greenmantle as a starting point. A bio he wrote of Montrose is very good. Yours, Larry Parr nobody wrote: wrote: DELIBERATELY OBTUSE?.. Concerning the rest of the idiotic chatter, General Haig, if he had been concerned about the Marxists and the like, would have favored stopping the war as did Lord Lansdowne. Leftish writers such as H.G. Wells screamed that Lansdowne was more concerned about social revolution than the Huns. (L. Parr) Dear Mr. Parr, Are you being deliberately obtuse or is my point so profound, shocking & unthinkable as not to have occurred to you? Namely, why should Haig seek to curtail what effectively was the culling of a generation of those young males most likely influenced by international political upheaval to the detriment of the class he represented (ie the ruling class)? Or, are you so naive you consider Gen. Haig some sort of benign, cuddly, Baden-Powellish, father figure?.. |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 28, 12:16 am, " wrote:
SPONTANEOUS REPAIR? I wrote incorrectly that my computer email had been repaired. So far as I can determine, it repaired itself. Is there such a thing as spontaneous computer tissue repair? Several of you are computer mavens. Let me describe what happened. No maven here, but if you have "automatic update" on your windows system enabled, Microsoft will be continually sending you new features, which once in a while will mess something up. Particularly if you have any non-monopoly software on your system. A few weeks later, a new update may fix the problem. Such at any rate was my experience during my first months of using a windows machine. William Hyde |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Computer vs Computer Chess Books? | Guest[_2_] | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 2 | January 27th 08 07:05 PM |
| Polgar's Idea of Free Speech--???! | Vidmar | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 1 | May 7th 07 11:04 PM |
| Larry Parr visits Sam Sloan's websites to learn about Pokémon | politikalhack@gmail.com | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 57 | January 30th 07 02:43 PM |
| Rated PC-chess playing against other Chess Engines ? | BottleGhost | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 3 | January 26th 07 04:10 PM |
| An old article about early chess computers! Quite amusing rant. | westgatealarms@gmail.com | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 0 | January 21st 07 06:32 AM |