From: "StanB"
Date: 29/07/03 03:35 GMT Daylight Time
Message-id:


"Mhoulsby" -remove- wrote in message
...

Surely the point of the recent war in Iraq which cost, and is still
costing
many American and British lives, was to enable the Iraqi people to enjoy
such
rights, rather than living under the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein?

Are you suggesting that Nick should be *denied* those rights?

This is kinda a lame argument. Nobody is denying him any rights. We just
wish he'd exercise those rites in the proper venue.


You mean, the way Hanke does?

http://www.flashbunny.org/content/frenchmagazine.html

To me (an ignorant Brit) it appears only that what he is doing is
redressing a
seriously distorted and right-wing imbalance in the posts of StanB,
Briarroot
and you (among several others, although those several others have not
attacked
him in the manner in which the three of you have, repeatedly, and continue
to
do).

snips more typical Booz lies

"Mhoulsby" -remove- wrote in message
...

snips more typical Booz lies

Did you just censor me? You big hypocrit.

StanB

"Mhoulsby" -remove- wrote in message
...

Did you just censor me? You big hypocrit.

No, Stan, it's not censorship. Your lies (which have been refuted many
times)
are still on Google for anybody with nothing better to do than to read the
same...

I have never lied and you have never refuted anything. Au contraire, you
have conceded many things. Including, that you are unmarried, have trouble
forming interpersonal relationships, and are not well liked at work.

StanB

The item under dispute---"He Nick is a polished bigot. Priggishly
educated, he permits his prejudices take
precedence over his proper sense. Put that in your pipe and puff it."

From: "StanB"
Date: 29/07/03 13:34 GMT Daylight Time
Message-id:


"Mhoulsby" -remove- wrote in message
...

Did you just censor me? You big hypocrit.

No, Stan, it's not censorship. Your lies (which have been refuted many
times)
are still on Google for anybody with nothing better to do than to read the
same...

I have never lied and you have never refuted anything. Au contraire, you
have conceded many things. Including, that you are unmarried,

This is easily substantiated, and is true.

have trouble
forming interpersonal relationships,

This is impossible to substantiate, and is a lie.

D'Oh!!

and are not well liked at work.

This, too, is impossible to substantiate, and is another lie.

D'OH!!!

You're really embarrassingly bad at trolling, aren't you?

snip

Mark

"StanB" wrote in message ...
"Mhoulsby" -remove- wrote in message
...
StanB wrote:
Did you just censor me? You big hypocrit.

No, Stan, it's not censorship. Your lies (which have been refuted many
times) are still on Google for anybody with nothing better to do than
to read the same...

I have never lied and you have never refuted anything.

I don't read every post between StanB and Mark Houlsby.
But I have proved that StanB has lied about me.

Here's a link to the evidence in my post in "Tim Hanke's Cultural Prejudice"
(30 July 2003):
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V27416E75

Au contraire, you have conceded many things. Including, that you are
unmarried, have trouble forming interpersonal relationships, and are not
well liked at work.
StanB

Mark Houlsby already has responded to StanB's ad hominem fantasies about him.

The item under dispute---"He Nick is a polished bigot. Priggishly
educated, he permits his prejudices take precedence over his proper sense.
Put that in your pipe and puff it."

StanB seems rather inconsistent, though always ludicrous, in his ad hominem
fantasies about me.

In the thread, "Zhang Zhong revisited" (28 May 2003), StanB wrote that I am,
among other things, "uneducateable" (sic), and in the thread, "Tim Hanke's
Cultural Prejudice" (26 July 2003), StanB referred to my "pidgin English".

Could StanB ever understand the relationship between Leonard Bast and
Helen Schlegel in "Howard's End" by E.M. Forster? :-)

--Nick