A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

If chess pieces could talk...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 7th 03, 07:04 AM
Briarroot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If chess pieces could talk...

RSHaas wrote:

There is a Zero sitting in the back of an Atlanta museum on Peachtree
Street.
The Japs developed quite a good fighter, the Reppu, to attack B-29's but
their entry came too late in the war. (RSHaas)


Yeah. By the end of the war, the Japanese had developed
a fighter with better performance than the American P-51,
but they were hampered by fuel shortages which left them
with such poorly trained pilots that they needn't have
bothered. A situation similar to the Germans with their
Me-262 jet. Too little, too late.
  #2  
Old August 7th 03, 03:12 PM
ASCACHESS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If chess pieces could talk...

Yeah. By the end of the war, the Japanese had developed
a fighter with better performance than the American P-51,
but they were hampered by fuel shortages which left them
with such poorly trained pilots that they needn't have
bothered. A situation similar to the Germans with their
Me-262 jet. Too little, too late.


Ah yes.
The Germans had the best fighter, the best tank, and the only guided missles,
but lost.
Could it have had something to do with the fact that America produced 55,000
tanks while the Germans only produced 5,000?

  #3  
Old August 7th 03, 11:08 PM
Briarroot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If chess pieces could talk...

ASCACHESS wrote:

Yeah. By the end of the war, the Japanese had developed
a fighter with better performance than the American P-51,
but they were hampered by fuel shortages which left them
with such poorly trained pilots that they needn't have
bothered. A situation similar to the Germans with their
Me-262 jet. Too little, too late.


Ah yes.
The Germans had the best fighter, the best tank, and the only guided missles,
but lost.
Could it have had something to do with the fact that America produced 55,000
tanks while the Germans only produced 5,000?


Total German tank production from 1934 to 1945 was approximately
20,000 vehicles, which includes light tanks. During the war, the
US was able to produced over 50,000 Sherman tanks in a single year!
The Russians too, despite being forced to relocate many of their
tank factories to the Urals to prevent their being overrun by the
advancing Wehrmacht, out-produced the Germans by a very large margin.

The only problems were for the tankers who had to go into combat
in the inferior tanks. The German Panzer Mark IV had similar armor
thickness to the American Sherman, but had a gun with much better
armor penetration capabilities. The Panzer Mark V Panther was
superior in every respect, as were the Panzer Mark VI Tigers.

It was said during the war that it took 5 Shermans to knock out a
Tiger; four to offer themselves as targets, and one to drive behind
the Tiger to shoot it in the rear or sides where its armor was much
thinner. Obviously not a pleasant experience for the Sherman crews!
  #4  
Old August 8th 03, 01:57 AM
RSHaas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If chess pieces could talk...

"Obviously not a pleasant experience for the Sherman crews!" (woodsy)
=============
The Sherman burned furiously when hit. The Germans called them "Tommie
Cookers." (RSHaas)
  #5  
Old August 8th 03, 06:27 AM
Briarroot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If chess pieces could talk...

RSHaas wrote:

"Obviously not a pleasant experience for the Sherman crews!" (woodsy)
=============
The Sherman burned furiously when hit. The Germans called them "Tommie
Cookers." (RSHaas)


Also known as "Ronsons" after the cigarette lighter whose ads
claimed that it "Lights the First Time, Every Time!"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright 2004-2017 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.