Heil Dubya!
************************************************** ************************
********************
In 17 days, I must appear in court, because I refused to supply
"identification", when trying to exchange tickets at Grand Central Station.
It's been a while since I have seen comment on this outrageous attack on human
rights, so I resubmit my account of the incident. (It may not be as exciting
to those who love a "good" "sexual" issue, but I think it is as important to
human rights as the recent attempt by the U. S. Government to frame Alex
Sherzer, perhaps, a bit better known in the world of chess than am I.)
************************************************** ************************
********************
When I was in the sixth grade, I had a teacher, Mrs. Wilson, who used to tell
us how wonderful it was to live in the United States. Her favorite reason was
that, while people had to carry identification at all times in other countries,
we could walk the streets with no identification at all and, as long as we were
peaceful, we were safe from governmental interference. Oh, well, tempus fugit.

Infringement of Human Rights and False Arrest in Grand Central Station

On Wednesday morning, 10 September, I went to New York, as I do almost every
Wednesday, to coach S. S., a dear friend, in chess. This is one of the small
pleasures of my life, particularly because my friend is 97 years old and keeps
alive in me the hope that I shall be as vital as she, if and when I reach my
98th year.

I planned to stop in Mount Vernon, on my way back, to visit another friend, so
I purchased three tickets at the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) station
in White Plains, where I live: one from White Plains to Grand Central Terminal;
one from Grand Central Terminal to Mount Vernon; and one from Mount Vernon to
White Plains. The charges were $4.00 for the first ticket, $3.50 for the
second ticket and $1.00 for the third ticket. (I am 75 years old, so pay
reduced fares, as a "senior citizen".)

As often is the case, I enjoyed myself so much at the home of S. S. that I left
it much later than originally intended. I called my Mount Vernon friend, who
found a late visit inconvenient, so we cancelled our appointment and arranged
another date and time to meet. As the saying goes, "No problem."

When I arrived at Grand Central Station, of course, I went to the ticket office
to exchange my two tickets (GCT to MV and MV to W, as they were designated on
the tickets) for a single ride to White Plains -- and a fifty cent refund.
There, the clerk asked me for identification.

"Why?" I asked. "Where is it written?"

I don't remember the exact response, but I do remember that my questions were
not answered. Instead, I was ordered to provide identification, if I wanted to
exchange my two tickets for one ticket and a fifty cent refund. Those were the
regulations, I was told, and they didn't have to show me where it was written.

I refused to provide the ordered identification.

The clerk told me to move on, if I wouldn't show identification. I refused to
do this, too, so we were at a brief impasse. This didn't last long, because
the clerk left her window to get a supervisor, who, when he arrived, supported
the clerk's position that identification was required, because those were the
regulations: no identification, no exchange of tickets and no refund. (He also
ignored the question about "where was it written.")

I refused again, so the supervisor repeated the injunction of the clerk: move
on. When I stood my ground at the ticket window, he summoned the MTA police.
I am of average size (five feet nine inches and 185 pounds), so only four
members of the force showed up. They wore badge numbers 2273, 2337, 2461 and
2480.

They tried to "reason" with me. Essentially, their points were that it wasn't
worth my trouble to refuse to show identification over a fifty cent refund;
that, were I to be arrested, it would be a terrible inconvenience for me and
that I would be put in jail, probably overnight, with felons and other
miscreants. (The former was their word, but I supply the latter.) Why not be
a good boy (None of them was old enough to be, normally, my child; I believe
all could have been my grandchildren.), show the identification and go home to
White Plains. I think they did achieve one goal; they got me away from the
ticket window.

After a brief discussion, we went our separate ways and I returned to the
ticket window where the quiet scene of five to ten minutes earlier was
repeated. This time, when the MTA police were called, only two showed up.
Apparently, they had met the enemy and decided that it was not imposing enough
for four officers. This time, there was little discussion. I was arrested and
brought to the MTA police station. It was an uncomfortable - but not
frightening -- experience. What I disliked most was being handcuffed behind my
back, with cuffs that were rather too tight (and left an impression on my skin,
which I noticed when they were removed).

In the police station, I was searched and had everything removed from my
pockets. My money was removed from its wallet and, after being counted, was
stuffed into my shirt pocket. Everything else was kept by the MTA police. I
believe the arresting officer intended to keep all my medications, but I
appealed to the sergeant on duty, who allowed me to have my nitroglycerine. I
was told to remove my shoes, which they kept, and locked up. Despite having my
identification, the arresting officer asked me several questions, to identify
me, such as name, address and date of birth. The poor man was most annoyed.
Here, he was, stuck arresting a 75-year-old eccentric, when, as he told me, he
was needed for more important duties, like "the war on terrorists". ("You are
taking us away from serious things, like 9-11" and other such words of
opprobrium, which I tuned out, after the first sentence,)

The sergeant who allowed me to keep my nitroglycerine, seemed to want to get
rid of this nuisance, so he asked me if I would go home quietly -- not return
to the ticket window -- if I received a ticket to White Plains and fifty cents.
I told him, "Of course. That's what I wanted from the beginning." He told me
he would see what he could do. About a half hour or a little more later, he
returned with the ticket to White Plains, the fifty cents and a summons to
answer a charge of "DISCON" at 314 W 54 St, Summons Part AR 6, on 15 October
2003. I plan to plead, "Not guilty", of course. I also plan to sue the MTA
for infringement of my human rights and for false arrest. (If anyone knows a
lawyer who is willing to take these cases on a pro bono basis, I would
appreciate a contact.)

("Dammittohell!" in my favorite exclamation of Nils's Uncle Chris. The 15th of
October is a Wednesday and I shall miss my date with S. S.)

Heute Uhmuhrikkka, Afghanistan und Irak. Morgen die ganze Welt!

Uhmuhrikkka, Uhmuhrikkka uber Alles!

(Was 11 September 2001 Kristalnacht or the date of the Reichstag fire?)

Fraternally,

Jerome Bibuld

gens una sumus

..
Correction:

In 17 days, I must appear in court, because I refused to supply
"identification", when trying to exchange tickets at Grand Central Station.


Mr. Bibuld should have said that in 17 days he must appear in court because
he (twice) physically obstructed a public ticket-window at Grand Central
Station -- a misdemeanor, I suppose.
After the first such offense, he was maneuvered away from the window by
police and released. However, determined to prove the old adage: "you can't
teach an old dog, new tricks" to be true, he returned to the window and
proceeded to give satisfaction to the evil window clerk and his icy boss, who
no doubt felt quite important and powerful upon seeing their tormenter dragged
away to jail, in handcuffs.




It's been a while since I have seen comment on this outrageous attack on
human rights


I strongly suspect that the reason for this has something to do with the
extreme difficulty of connecting such behavior in any way with the important
cause of human rights. Were it not for my excellent sense of humor, I might
lecture Mr. Bibuld for trivializing human rights by attempting to portray his
petty silliness as some sort of grand sacrifice for the greater good of
mankind.





as long as we were
peaceful, we were safe from governmental interference


"Peaceful" does not include obstruction of public ticket-windows, now does
it, Mr. Bibuld? There's a good boy.

"NoMoreChess" wrote in message
...
.
Correction:

In 17 days, I must appear in court, because I refused to supply
"identification", when trying to exchange tickets at Grand Central
Station.


Mr. Bibuld should have said that in 17 days he must appear in court
because
he (twice) physically obstructed a public ticket-window at Grand Central
Station -- a misdemeanor, I suppose.
After the first such offense, he was maneuvered away from the window by
police and released. However, determined to prove the old adage: "you
can't
teach an old dog, new tricks" to be true, he returned to the window and
proceeded to give satisfaction to the evil window clerk and his icy boss,
who
no doubt felt quite important and powerful upon seeing their tormenter
dragged
away to jail, in handcuffs.




It's been a while since I have seen comment on this outrageous attack on
human rights


I strongly suspect that the reason for this has something to do with the
extreme difficulty of connecting such behavior in any way with the
important
cause of human rights. Were it not for my excellent sense of humor, I
might
lecture Mr. Bibuld for trivializing human rights by attempting to portray
his
petty silliness as some sort of grand sacrifice for the greater good of
mankind.





as long as we were
peaceful, we were safe from governmental interference


"Peaceful" does not include obstruction of public ticket-windows, now
does
it, Mr. Bibuld? There's a good boy.

Exactly.

Thank you, Mr. Kennedy. Hopefully Ol' Jerry will realize this.

(But I'm not holding my breath.)

Regards,

Matt