A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

Anand wins



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 5th 03, 06:42 AM
Isidor Gunsberg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Anand wins

EZoto wrote in message ws.com...
On 31 Oct 2003 00:16:06 GMT, (Etj718) wrote:

That is a tough one to predict. However Kramnik's match experience is
pretty dismal



Dismal?? are you forgetting that Krmnik beat Kasparov +2=13-0 to
win the Braingames World Championship.

Lack of experience was the rub against Kramnik BEFORE he played a
16 Game match vs. Kasparov

On the other hand, Anand has plenty of match experience, much of
it...."dismal". He got slapped about by Garry, and choked against
Karpov and Kamsky.

Obviously, Anand would not be a pushover, but one has to consider
his nerves in high stakes matches.

while Anand has a lot of match experience over Kramnik.
I pick Anand with a slight edge due to match experience.

EZoto

According to TWIC Anand defeats Krammnik 1.5-0.5 in the Finals of the Cap
d'agde World Rapid Chess Championships.If these 2 players were to play a Match
with classical Time controls 40/2 1/2 who do the posters here think would be
favored to win lets say for arguments sake a 10 Game match?
E-JAY

Ads
  #2  
Old November 5th 03, 06:45 AM
Isidor Gunsberg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Anand wins

"Jerzy" wrote in message ...
"Etj718" wrote in message
...
That game was impressive indeed.A tough call on who would win a long
match.Beating Kasparov is a tough feat so there I would give the advantage

to
Krammnik.Talent wise (and I realize I am not strong enough to state this)

My
gut says Anand is a better talent.As in all matches the outcome would be
determined by the player in the better form.If I had to pick..I think

Krammnik
would win.Anand has had problems in the past...example vs Kamsky


The fact is that Anand has won the min-match and has a psychological
advantage before their hypothetical re-match.



The problem with all of these KO Rapid events is that they don't
mean much. I doubt that Kramnik will be cowed by the prospect of
having to playing Anand in a match of length, with slow Time Controls.
Everybody knows that faster Time Controls are Anand's forte.


The London match between Kramnik and Kasparov and previuos matches between
kasparov and Anand are now history and I look forward to new matches for the
chess crown.
There should be new names, new chess battles. But so far we can see nothing
only endless cancellations of the matches. It`s more regrettable that they
are without participation of many outstanding grandmasters with Anand on the
top...

Regards,
Jerzy

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - WoW Gold - Personal Loans - Cheap Moissanite Earrings - Auto Loans