A short while ago Susan Polgar posted here on rgcp that she hoped she could
announce by this Novermber a major breakout for American chess. So far..
nothing. Anyone know of anything in the works?

RSHaas

"RSHaas" wrote in message
...
A short while ago Susan Polgar posted here on rgcp that she hoped she
could
announce by this Novermber a major breakout for American chess. So far..
nothing. Anyone know of anything in the works?

RSHaas

USCF will be going to the Mensa set-up.

"Jon Haskel" wrote in message ...
"RSHaas" wrote in message
...
A short while ago Susan Polgar posted here on rgcp that she hoped she
could
announce by this Novermber a major breakout for American chess. So far..
nothing. Anyone know of anything in the works?

RSHaas

USCF will be going to the Mensa set-up.

I think what she meant is that all of the scholastic members are
growing up and hitting puberty, and that their faces are about to
break out.

GreenPencil wrote:

"Jon Haskel" wrote in message ...
"RSHaas" wrote in message
...
A short while ago Susan Polgar posted here on rgcp that she hoped she
could
announce by this Novermber a major breakout for American chess. So far..
nothing. Anyone know of anything in the works?

RSHaas

USCF will be going to the Mensa set-up.

I think what she meant is that all of the scholastic members are
growing up and hitting puberty, and that their faces are about to
break out.

No. What she meant was the prisoners are tired of paying the
outrageous sum of $10.00 to join USCF and they are about to break out,
so they can pay the regular adult rate of $49.00 and help USCF numbers.


Best Regards,

Bruce

"RSHaas" wrote in message
...

A short while ago Susan Polgar posted here on rgcp that she hoped she
could
announce by this Novermber a major breakout for American chess. So far..
nothing. Anyone know of anything in the works?

No but I bet the volunteer of the year will send us a bill anyway.

StanB

"StanB" wrote in message ...
"RSHaas" wrote in message
...

A short while ago Susan Polgar posted here on rgcp that she hoped she
could
announce by this Novermber a major breakout for American chess. So far..
nothing. Anyone know of anything in the works?

No but I bet the volunteer of the year will send us a bill anyway.

StanB

I realize that innuendo is your preferred mode of operation. Just for
a change of pace, why don't you post the statement she submitted and
go through the charges by line item?

"Bill Brock" wrote in message
om...

A short while ago Susan Polgar posted here on rgcp that she hoped she
could
announce by this Novermber a major breakout for American chess. So
far..
nothing. Anyone know of anything in the works?

No but I bet the volunteer of the year will send us a bill anyway.

I realize that innuendo is your preferred mode of operation. Just for
a change of pace, why don't you post the statement she submitted and
go through the charges by line item?

You still championing these bloodsuckers?

StanB

"StanB" wrote in message ...
"Bill Brock" wrote in message
om...

A short while ago Susan Polgar posted here on rgcp that she hoped she
could
announce by this Novermber a major breakout for American chess. So
far..
nothing. Anyone know of anything in the works?

No but I bet the volunteer of the year will send us a bill anyway.

I realize that innuendo is your preferred mode of operation. Just for
a change of pace, why don't you post the statement she submitted and
go through the charges by line item?

You still championing these bloodsuckers?

StanB

I prefer to deal in facts. Back in October, I made several queries
about the various allegations. Most of the people I contacted don't
want to be involved in the matter publicly, but all spoke about her
character in positive terms.

There is more I would say here, but I won't say it publicly without
evidence.

Facts are stubborn things: if you have firm evidence to the contrary,
that's another matter. I'm not in the habit of championing
counterfactuals.

So let's see the evidence.

I prefer to deal in facts. Back in October, I made several queries
about the various allegations. Most of the people I contacted don't
want to be involved in the matter publicly, but all spoke about her
character in positive terms.

There is more I would say here, but I won't say it publicly without
evidence.

Facts are stubborn things: if you have firm evidence to the contrary,
that's another matter. I'm not in the habit of championing
counterfactuals.

So let's see the evidence.


I don't know about realities in this case, but we have been the subject of so
many lies regarding "facts" on this forum that one could be forgiven if she/he
was stubborn in not believing the given facts.

Even with Susan's excellent character as a given, she hurts herself by
surrounding herself with the Bob Bennett's of this world. The hyperbole of Mr.
Truong was so over the top, people could certainly be confused as to Susan's
character when Paul is claiming thousands of positive responses per month for
her column.

While Susan did not make this claim, Truong has claimed a business relationship
and Susan has not rejected that claim.

Rp

(ASCACHESS) wrote in message ...
I prefer to deal in facts. Back in October, I made several queries
about the various allegations. Most of the people I contacted don't
want to be involved in the matter publicly, but all spoke about her
character in positive terms.

There is more I would say here, but I won't say it publicly without
evidence.

Facts are stubborn things: if you have firm evidence to the contrary,
that's another matter. I'm not in the habit of championing
counterfactuals.

So let's see the evidence.


I don't know about realities in this case, but we have been the subject of so
many lies regarding "facts" on this forum that one could be forgiven if she/he
was stubborn in not believing the given facts.

Even with Susan's excellent character as a given, she hurts herself by
surrounding herself with the Bob Bennett's of this world. The hyperbole of Mr.
Truong was so over the top, people could certainly be confused as to Susan's
character when Paul is claiming thousands of positive responses per month for
her column.

While Susan did not make this claim, Truong has claimed a business relationship
and Susan has not rejected that claim.

Rp

To the extent that agent may have said something demonstrably untrue
about principal & did not retract, and principal did not subsequently
distance herself, yes, that's an ethical issue. But that's a long way
from financial impropriety.

Put simply: "bloodsuckers" was in the plural. Is it asking too much
to ask for proof? Or is it considered fair game to toss such words
around as sport?

If the word fits, I wouldn't want SP around USCF, either. But due
process is essential. If the word doesn't fit, she's being defamed.
If the answer is neither black nor white, there are ways to protect
USCF's interests without sullying SP's reputation.