This should send a message to every person online who thinks they can go around
trashing others without consequence.

One of the people mentioned in the Polgar mess got into something similar with
me not long ago and seemed to think it was just a joke.

Anyone who wants to talk smack about someone else better have good authority to
back it up.

Way to go Susan!

This should send a message to every person online who thinks they can go
around
trashing others without consequence.

You mean everyone should become anonymice to protect themselves from legal
action?

John Fernandez

This should send a message to every person online who thinks they can go
around
trashing others without consequence.

You mean everyone should become anonymice to protect themselves from legal
action?

Remailers lack credibility.

"John Fernandez" wrote in message
...

This should send a message to every person online who thinks they can go
around
trashing others without consequence.

You mean everyone should become anonymice to protect themselves from legal
action?

You may have something here. Maybe that's why...how's it go? "Those that
live by the sword..."?

StanB

(LeModernCaveman) wrote in message ...
This should send a message to every person online who thinks they can go around
trashing others without consequence.

One of the people mentioned in the Polgar mess got into something similar with
me not long ago and seemed to think it was just a joke.

Anyone who wants to talk smack about someone else better have good authority to
back it up.

Way to go Susan!

I agree. Ms. Polgar has every right to defend her good name, and it
is gratifying to see her do so. I hope she proceeds with the lawsuit
and wins big.

Danny Purvis

"Danny Purvis" wrote in message
om...
(LeModernCaveman) wrote in message
...
This should send a message to every person online who thinks they can go
around
trashing others without consequence.

One of the people mentioned in the Polgar mess got into something
similar with
me not long ago and seemed to think it was just a joke.

Anyone who wants to talk smack about someone else better have good
authority to
back it up.
Way to go Susan!

I agree. Ms. Polgar has every right to defend her good name, and it
is gratifying to see her do so. I hope she proceeds with the lawsuit
and wins big.
Danny Purvis

If Trollgar has any sense, they will not sue. The case is extremely weak.
It's not libel to dislike a public figure, and say so.

(LeModernCaveman) wrote in message ...
This should send a message to every person online who thinks they can go around
trashing others without consequence.

One of the people mentioned in the Polgar mess got into something similar with
me not long ago and seemed to think it was just a joke.

Anyone who wants to talk smack about someone else better have good authority to
back it up.

Way to go Susan!
_________________________________
How many libel suits have you won, LMC?

KidDon

"Neil Brennen" wrote in message ink.net...
"Danny Purvis" wrote in message
om...
(LeModernCaveman) wrote in message
...
This should send a message to every person online who thinks they can go
around
trashing others without consequence.

One of the people mentioned in the Polgar mess got into something
similar with
me not long ago and seemed to think it was just a joke.

Anyone who wants to talk smack about someone else better have good
authority to
back it up.
Way to go Susan!

I agree. Ms. Polgar has every right to defend her good name, and it
is gratifying to see her do so. I hope she proceeds with the lawsuit
and wins big.
Danny Purvis

If Trollgar has any sense, they will not sue. The case is extremely weak.
It's not libel to dislike a public figure, and say so.

Evidently, the statements that Ms. Polgar considers clearly libelous
are in emails that have not been aired in this group. But the jury
will have all of this information in black and white. If libel has
occurred, there will be no hiding the fact.

One thing for sure, we do not need to speculate on whether Ms. Polgar
"has any sense". If she proceeds with the lawsuit, that will be a
good sign that her case is not weak after all.


Danny Purvis

"Danny Purvis" wrote in message
om...

Evidently, the statements that Ms. Polgar considers clearly libelous
are in emails that have not been aired in this group.

She was on the distribution list.

StanB

"StanB" wrote in message ...
"Danny Purvis" wrote in message
om...

Evidently, the statements that Ms. Polgar considers clearly libelous
are in emails that have not been aired in this group.

She was on the distribution list.

StanB

Clearly she has access to the material that is the substance of her
complaint, but she prefers to reserve this material for a possible
court date rather than exhibit it here. But if you would like to post
some of it, I for one would be interested in looking.

If I were you, however, I would simply apologize, an action that she
indicated would end the matter. Whether or not you are in the wrong
legally, you have certainly done some vigorous mudslinging, and an
apology would not be out of order on that score alone.


Danny Purvis