![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: 2004, board, election, executive, uscf |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear USCF Member,
As you may be aware, due to the resignations of two Executive Board Members the USCF will hold a special election for two one-year terms to the USCF Executive Board. If ever the USCF needed effective board members, it's now. When you are talking about a single year term one should not consider participation on the executive board as a reward for years of chess service, a way to get celebrity/benefit for oneself or ones institution, an item to be bought, or just something to add to ones resume or memoirs. The Executive Board has the principal responsibility for fulfillment of the organization's mission and the legal accountability for its operations. Board members therefore hold the key to organizational accountability and are its guardians on behalf of you -- the membership. This means that the Board is in charge of establishing a clear organizational mission, forming the strategic plan to accomplish the mission, overseeing and evaluating the plan's success, hiring a competent executive director and providing adequate supervision and support to that individual, ensuring financial solvency of the organization, interpreting and representing the membership to the organization, and instituting a fair system of policies and procedures for human resource management. The Board in essence directs, oversees, and measures how the mission is accomplished. Right now, to be effective in my opinion, the Board needs people with experience in the above disciplines who are willing to roll up their sleeves and pitch in. I'd like to offer my assistance to the Board, and become a candidate for one of the single-year terms to the USCF Executive Board. Since the Board represents the interests of the membership, I will need to align myself with your direction about what is important for the USCF. Therefore I'd like to hear from USCF members about their issues, concern, ideas, priorities, as well as what you feel is of value regarding your organization. I encourage USCF members to ask questions of the candidates and post the answers so the issues can be discussed. I'm somewhat of a regular here as I've been posting about chess issues on Usenet since 1994 and before that on the Leisure Linc. I now tend to drop into rgcp about once a week and I have the newsgroup filtered so I may miss some things. Thus it will more reliable to contact me through email. Please feel free to email me with your comments and questions. I'll be glad to just listen or provide you with my current perspective on any of the issues facing the USCF. I hope to complete my nomination process shortly and then as a candidate see if you think I would add anything helpful to our Executive Board. To find out more you can visit my developing web page at http://members.aol.com/betteruscf/ . Regards, Wayne Praeder |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good luck Wayne,
You might want to remove your rose colored glasses. There's lots of missing "shoulds" in your post here. I have a question for you. What do you intend to do or believe should be done to halt the decline of USCF adult regular members? What do you think a fair dues rate should be for the major classes of membership. Is your goal to put USCF on life support first and then work to restore it vigor? Without a book and equipment business and without a stable base of adult members, how can USCF generate the needed capital to operate over the next several years. As only a single Board member, what difference would you be able to make realistically speaking in an organization that has had 6 different Presidents and 9 Executive Directors or leaders since 1995? Does this indicate to you that the problems are too great for single individuals or even Boards of 6-7 people to solve effectively? While your promise not to use the position to innure benefits to yourself if elected, what will you do to prevent the other various people who have done and continue to do exactly that if elected? Thanks for running. I hope you and Bauer win. With you, Bauer, and Hanke on the Board, you might even be able to bring some sanity to this turkey. Best Regards, Bruce |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
What a crock!
This would be similar to a requirement that whoever ran for Congress should have stopped off in Washington DC and watched them "in action." Yawn, what a waste of time. I don't need to have attended a USCF meeting to understand its challenges. I can read a balance sheet and a cashflow statement. Randy Bauer I am a candidate for the USCF Executive Board "Sam Sloan" wrote in message ... Over the years, Wayne Praeder has been providing a wealth of useful information about the USCF, much of what I have put on my website. However, nobody that I know has ever seen him, and he apparently has never played in a USCF rated tournament. http://www.64.com/uscf/ratings/12887461 I am concerned that none of the declared candidates for the coming election have ever attended a USCF meeting of any kind, other than myself. Prior to OMOV, anybody who ran for election first came to a few USCF delegate's meetings before running for election. This past election we had two candidates who had never been to a USCF meeting. Now, we have four candidates, including Mr. Wayne Praeder, who have never attended a USCF meeting. I think it is disturbing that people try to get elected to the USCF Executive Board without first bothering to learn about the organization. Sam Sloan On 17 Mar 2004 23:56:09 GMT, (WPraeder) wrote: Dear USCF Member, As you may be aware, due to the resignations of two Executive Board Members the USCF will hold a special election for two one-year terms to the USCF Executive Board. If ever the USCF needed effective board members, it's now. When you are talking about a single year term one should not consider participation on the executive board as a reward for years of chess service, a way to get celebrity/benefit for oneself or ones institution, an item to be bought, or just something to add to ones resume or memoirs. The Executive Board has the principal responsibility for fulfillment of the organization's mission and the legal accountability for its operations. Board members therefore hold the key to organizational accountability and are its guardians on behalf of you -- the membership. This means that the Board is in charge of establishing a clear organizational mission, forming the strategic plan to accomplish the mission, overseeing and evaluating the plan's success, hiring a competent executive director and providing adequate supervision and support to that individual, ensuring financial solvency of the organization, interpreting and representing the membership to the organization, and instituting a fair system of policies and procedures for human resource management. The Board in essence directs, oversees, and measures how the mission is accomplished. Right now, to be effective in my opinion, the Board needs people with experience in the above disciplines who are willing to roll up their sleeves and pitch in. I'd like to offer my assistance to the Board, and become a candidate for one of the single-year terms to the USCF Executive Board. Since the Board represents the interests of the membership, I will need to align myself with your direction about what is important for the USCF. Therefore I'd like to hear from USCF members about their issues, concern, ideas, priorities, as well as what you feel is of value regarding your organization. I encourage USCF members to ask questions of the candidates and post the answers so the issues can be discussed. I'm somewhat of a regular here as I've been posting about chess issues on Usenet since 1994 and before that on the Leisure Linc. I now tend to drop into rgcp about once a week and I have the newsgroup filtered so I may miss some things. Thus it will more reliable to contact me through email. Please feel free to email me with your comments and questions. I'll be glad to just listen or provide you with my current perspective on any of the issues facing the USCF. I hope to complete my nomination process shortly and then as a candidate see if you think I would add anything helpful to our Executive Board. To find out more you can visit my developing web page at http://members.aol.com/betteruscf/ . Regards, Wayne Praeder |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:36:08 GMT, "Randy Bauer"
wrote: What a crock! This would be similar to a requirement that whoever ran for Congress should have stopped off in Washington DC and watched them "in action." Yawn, what a waste of time. I don't need to have attended a USCF meeting to understand its challenges. I can read a balance sheet and a cashflow statement. Randy Bauer I am a candidate for the USCF Executive Board Certainly the ability to read a balance sheet and a cash flow statement are important and useful qualifications which have been lacking in some prior USCF administrations. For example, when Tim Redman was president we found out that not only did Redman not know how to read a balance sheet, but he did not even know what a balance sheet was! Similarly when that self-procroclaimed master of business administration George DeFeis was Executive Director, we found out that he too did not even know what a balance sheet was. You are certainly qualified in that area. However, in my opinion, to serve on the board you need more. You need a plan, a program or an idea. So far, you have not told us yours.. So, what is it? I am also concerned about your view of USCF business meetings in which you state, "Yawn, what a waste of time." The people who attend these meetings are intelligent and dedicated people who have devoted a substantial portion to their lives to chess. They usually have valuable and important information to provide. It is also to be noted that this is a membership organization and they are members. If you feel that listening to the wishes of the members is a waste of time, I suspect that you might find better things to do rather than serve on this board. Sam Sloan Sam Sloan |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Subject: 2004 USCF Executive Board Election
From: (Sam Sloan) Date: 3/17/2004 11:06 PM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: Over the years, Wayne Praeder has been providing a wealth of useful information about the USCF, much of what I have put on my website. However, nobody that I know has ever seen him, and he apparently has never played in a USCF rated tournament. http://www.64.com/uscf/ratings/12887461 I am concerned that none of the declared candidates for the coming election have ever attended a USCF meeting of any kind, other than myself. Prior to OMOV, anybody who ran for election first came to a few USCF delegate's meetings before running for election. This past election we had two candidates who had never been to a USCF meeting. Now, we have four candidates, including Mr. Wayne Praeder, who have never attended a USCF meeting. I think it is disturbing that people try to get elected to the USCF Executive Board without first bothering to learn about the organization. Sam Sloan And I consider it a huge plus. John Fernandez |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"However, in my opinion, to serve on the board you need more. You need a plan,
a program or an idea." (Sam Sloan) =============== Sam, I can't say I've ever seen any unique plan, program, or idea of yours. RSHaas |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"I encourage USCF members to ask questions of the candidates and post the
answers so the issues can be discussed." (Wayne Praeder) ============= You and Bauer seem to have the "right stuff." But the both of you are coming in at a time when Chess HQ is being knocked down to a barebones operating status. Neither of you can have much of an impact because there is so little left with which to work. Nevertheless, what are you going to do to rehabilitate adult chess? How would you enhance and enrich our chess experience? If you do intend to listen to members, here's a little tip from an ex-member: $49 is well within my budget but I nevertheless regard it as an abusive asking price for membership. However, the current $38 offer to expired members seems tempting. The $11 difference isn't much of a savings but it does remove much of the perception of abuse. The lesson here is that many of us feel that we've been abused. RSHaas |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 18 Mar 2004 06:58:54 GMT, eepmeep (John
Fernandez) wrote: Subject: 2004 USCF Executive Board Election From: (Sam Sloan) Date: 3/17/2004 11:06 PM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: Over the years, Wayne Praeder has been providing a wealth of useful information about the USCF, much of what I have put on my website. However, nobody that I know has ever seen him, and he apparently has never played in a USCF rated tournament. http://www.64.com/uscf/ratings/12887461 I am concerned that none of the declared candidates for the coming election have ever attended a USCF meeting of any kind, other than myself. Prior to OMOV, anybody who ran for election first came to a few USCF delegate's meetings before running for election. This past election we had two candidates who had never been to a USCF meeting. Now, we have four candidates, including Mr. Wayne Praeder, who have never attended a USCF meeting. I think it is disturbing that people try to get elected to the USCF Executive Board without first bothering to learn about the organization. Sam Sloan And I consider it a huge plus. John Fernandez John "Know it all" Fernandez can well say that because he too has never attended a USCF delegates meeting or Executive Board meeting. At the 2002 USCF Delegate's meeting in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, John Fernandez although he was entitled to enter the room as a delegate stood just outside the meeting hall button-holeing delegates as they came in and out. He distainfully stated that he did not want to waste his time listening to what the delegates had to say. Instead, he wanted them to waste their time listening to what he had to say. Sam Sloan |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:36:08 GMT, "Randy Bauer"
wrote: What a crock! This would be similar to a requirement that whoever ran for Congress should have stopped off in Washington DC and watched them "in action." Yawn, what a waste of time. I don't need to have attended a USCF meeting to understand its challenges. I can read a balance sheet and a cashflow statement. Randy Bauer I am a candidate for the USCF Executive Board I think you misunderstand the nature of the position you are running for. If you are elected, you will be expected to attend four meetings of the USCF Executive Board during the next year. Each meeting will last two or three days. Your airfare and hotel expenses will be paid to attend these meetings. You will have one vote on the seven member board, so in order to get anything passed you will need the votes of three other board members. If you are elected, in all likelyhood you will also be elected the VP of Finance, because we need somebody to fill that position and you seem to be well qualified. I will certainly vote for you. However, since your comment about these meetings is "Yawn, what a waste of time" I do not see how you can expect yourself to attend four of these meetings per year. At least, at the annual delegates meeting, we can expect to see real fireworks and hope for a fistfight or two. At the Executive Board meetings, which are true love affairs, at least you will find a cure for insomnia. Is this really what you want to do? Sam Sloan |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| THE U.S.CHESS TRUST | WPraeder | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 22 | December 23rd 03 06:30 AM |
| Message from Yasser Seirawan about drug testing | Tim Hanke | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 60 | December 17th 03 07:04 PM |
| Peterson Lawsuit | Don Mihokovich | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 33 | August 29th 03 05:08 AM |
| L.A. Laws? | Eric Mark | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 28 | August 27th 03 01:50 PM |
| Will Tim Hanke actually take his seat on the USCF Executive Board? | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 37 | August 22nd 03 09:31 PM |