For being "in a hurry" you sure are long-winded.

Regards,

Matt

"starwars" wrote in message
elinux.net...
crossposted to the pertinent groups:
rec.games.chess.politics
rec.org.mensa
misc.legal.moderated

(c) Please exuse the grammar errors I'm in a hurry.
The Emancipation of an Bobby Fischer et al.

In defense of Bobby Fischer's alleged immigration status violation
coupled with his trouble's with the IRS should be carefully examined. But
will he be successfully be emancipated from the war mongering United
States of America? First, what gives the right of the U.S.A in keeping
the status of citizen especially expanding its immigration hand and
exerting its claw (involuntary servitude to the US) over a renegade-
refugee world citizen. Especially in regards to the emancipation of
Fischer. I have only glance over the (chess politics) groups articles
however sadly most are stuck in the past regarding Fischer's life.
Here's my take.

[Fischer may consider his attorney being appointed conservator and
establishing a trust in the name of Bobby Fischer in Japan, permitting
the expugnable circumstances.-Immigration policy. The tricky part and
Fischers gonna have to swallow his pride is claim_a mental disability.]

A simple solution regarding his refugee status in light of his legal
problems (IRS, and Violation of Executive Order) one would think that the
American Civil Liberties Union [ACLU] should take a look at the
situation. Most certainly, his renunciation however unpopular the move
may be has to be on the minds of many whom may be considering a similar
plight. For example, Let's say for general sakes that a group of American
citizens feel that the US is looming towards a dictatorship_or militant
(UN controlled)...Shouldn't those citizens be given the right to seek
refuge elsewhere? Afterally America opens its borders to countless
immigrants in the same precarious garret. Certainly Spain had it's eyes
opened this year in light of their recent terrorist attack, certainly
would they be willing to accept honest and productive citizens?
So an American citizen renounces his or citizenship this truly is a
litmus test for the validity of the United Nations. The U.N. is suppose
to be the peace-keepers of the world and also keeping a watch on corrupt
governments. So Bobby Fischers has renounced his status as an
American...he does have one right and that is the right to contest
his "renouncement" through the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

In other words, I think a Supreme Court In Bobby Fischer
Amicus Curiae brief should be considered regarding the status of
citizenship and expunge all obligations in light of his renunciation of
his of citizenship and define the terms of foreign emancipation. In
particular a citizens right to succeed from an oppressed country.
Exoneration should be in order. Although Fischer's case has many
ramifications and his immigration fiasco evinces Constitutional
precedence. I think it may set precedence in regards to his Violation of
the Executive Order as opposed to a company or corporation.
Some of the issues at hand -presenting these points from the Constitution
of the United States of America

Fischer's right to renounce his citizenship
Amendment I
[Freedom of religion, speech, of the press, and right to petition.]
...and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Fischer's right to freedom to seek refugee status under another nation.
Tricky because of his temperment...the saying "It's a small world" has
more meaning.
Amendment V
[Trials for crimes..]
...nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of
law.

Fischer's right for asylum as a political pardon the pun, pawn.
Amendment VIII
[Excessive bail, fines and punishments prohibited.]
...nor cruel and unusual punishment.

"Just because a right is written into the constitution doesn't
mean that the rights given to the people are less important."
Amendment IX
[Reserved rights of people.]
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Section 1 in particular should be the trick in the hat, par se.
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
[Citizenship defined; privileges of citizens.]

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state
wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;
nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

This section should also be carefully considered.
Section 4.
[Public debt not to be questioned; payment of debts and claims incurred
in aid of rebellion forbidden.]

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law,
including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for
services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be
unqestioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or
pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion
against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of
any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held
illegal and void.

Article I.
Section 8.
[Taxes, duties, imposts, and excises.-1.]
....for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but
all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United
States.

I believe given the state of the world this issue of "where a citizen can
go" need to be more defined in terms of immigration policy. Also
immigration court coupled with civil and criminal liabilities in essence
a personal declaration of independence from the mother country.
Ironically, America's Declaration of Independence states as on the
reasons for the people's succession as "For transporting us beyond Seas
to be tried for pretended offenses." Truly Fischer's plight opens up a
can of worms.

Remember filmmaker French citizen Roman Polanski was never extradited to
for a more serious crime of...rape (1970)! Perhaps-other former statesmen
been granted citizenship Fischer does have a valid reason for his
renunciation...the events unfolding within the borders of the United
States look anything at best grim. Reason number one: The population has
been dumbed down and exploited by the media that the current
administration is the so-called good guy. Not! If the reader of this
article is paying attention to current events one will notice G.W. Bush's
continual creation of "Departments"...hmm, did not Adolph Hitler
restructure the German government with Minister of this and that. Also,
Albert Einstein, et al fleeing the holocaust. Truly, if you were in
Fischer's shoes given his sentiments and comments you would be quaking in
your shoes too!


Now for some Fischer optimism.
Let us not forget Fischer's latest passion Fischer Random Chess (FRC) or
Chess 960!As Wolfgang A. Mozart "was the greatest living musician ever to
walk the face of the Earth" Bobby Fischer in the eyes of most chess
aficionados is worthy of comparison as the greatest chess player ever to
walk the face of the earth although silently and eccentrically. There's
an old parable 'silence is golden', I believe Fischer's is the epitome
of these words. Take note Mozart was a closet eccentric via his
coprolalia which most astute scholars will agree. Fischer on the other
hand is more vocal and very unpredictable but he's no threat to the
United States of America.
First, take Fischer Random Chess (FRC) an embellishment of an older
variation. Classicall chess is played with the symmetry of King op/sur e1
(204 pos.) move 518. If the reader of this article takes a look at the
960 random setups in FRC one cannot comprehend the infiniteness of FRC;
this was Fischer's final frontier. Keep in mind move 518 and its MCO
theory is virtually nil in FRC. Another analogy would be the world
strongest man lifting the same weight repeatedly, whereas FRC offers the
player the ability to expand his or her horizons, par se. Play Blitz
FRC's and you will see what I mean. Let us not forget the value of
Fischer's ideas and the ramifications should Fischer want to further the
progress of FRC. The key words look foreword! Take a look at this .pdf
and look through the sheet til you get to move 518.
http://www.xs4all.be/~marcsmet/ebbs/...FRC_960Pos.pdf
Those of you that have looked at the FRC configurations will find that
move 518 becomes rather trite and meager in comparison to the 959
configurations. Some GM are more bold to say that the symmetry of chess
is ruined. On the contrary move 518 is not used in FRC. In other words,
once the chess player looks at the FRC configurations one will look at
move 518 in a different light. Fischer would encourage all chess players'
novices too and have a play at Fischer Random Chess.
So back to Fischer's plight.
The case of Bobby Fischer represents one of eccentric refugee without a
country yet he's brash and still brilliant (I wonder in awe about
Fischer's FRC ideas). Fischer represents the common man who has given up
on the corruption and decay of the Western society. Nevertheless, at the
same time his persecution should be looked at in terms of an immigration
issue regarding American citizenship emancipation. Finally, in light of
the Patriot Act time is ticking before all US citizens will chipped and
carded Nationally. Deep down inside...perhaps Fischer's realization to
reality.

The nuts are falling from the trees early this year.

Ken Albin

"starwars" wrote in message
elinux.net...
crossposted to the pertinent groups:
rec.games.chess.politics
rec.org.mensa
misc.legal.moderated

(c) Please exuse the grammar errors I'm in a hurry.
The Emancipation of an Bobby Fischer et al.

In defense of Bobby Fischer's alleged immigration status violation
coupled with his trouble's with the IRS should be carefully examined. But
will he be successfully be emancipated from the war mongering United
States of America? First, what gives the right of the U.S.A in keeping
the status of citizen especially expanding its immigration hand and
exerting its claw (involuntary servitude to the US) over a renegade-
refugee world citizen. Especially in regards to the emancipation of
Fischer. I have only glance over the (chess politics) groups articles
however sadly most are stuck in the past regarding Fischer's life.
Here's my take.

[Fischer may consider his attorney being appointed conservator and
establishing a trust in the name of Bobby Fischer in Japan, permitting
the expugnable circumstances.-Immigration policy. The tricky part and
Fischers gonna have to swallow his pride is claim_a mental disability.]

A simple solution regarding his refugee status in light of his legal
problems (IRS, and Violation of Executive Order) one would think that the
American Civil Liberties Union [ACLU] should take a look at the
situation. Most certainly, his renunciation however unpopular the move
may be has to be on the minds of many whom may be considering a similar
plight. For example, Let's say for general sakes that a group of American
citizens feel that the US is looming towards a dictatorship_or militant
(UN controlled)...Shouldn't those citizens be given the right to seek
refuge elsewhere? Afterally America opens its borders to countless
immigrants in the same precarious garret. Certainly Spain had it's eyes
opened this year in light of their recent terrorist attack, certainly
would they be willing to accept honest and productive citizens?
So an American citizen renounces his or citizenship this truly is a
litmus test for the validity of the United Nations. The U.N. is suppose
to be the peace-keepers of the world and also keeping a watch on corrupt
governments. So Bobby Fischers has renounced his status as an
American...he does have one right and that is the right to contest
his "renouncement" through the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

In other words, I think a Supreme Court In Bobby Fischer
Amicus Curiae brief should be considered regarding the status of
citizenship and expunge all obligations in light of his renunciation of
his of citizenship and define the terms of foreign emancipation. In
particular a citizens right to succeed from an oppressed country.
Exoneration should be in order. Although Fischer's case has many
ramifications and his immigration fiasco evinces Constitutional
precedence. I think it may set precedence in regards to his Violation of
the Executive Order as opposed to a company or corporation.
Some of the issues at hand -presenting these points from the Constitution
of the United States of America

Fischer's right to renounce his citizenship
Amendment I
[Freedom of religion, speech, of the press, and right to petition.]
...and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Fischer's right to freedom to seek refugee status under another nation.
Tricky because of his temperment...the saying "It's a small world" has
more meaning.
Amendment V
[Trials for crimes..]
...nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of
law.

Fischer's right for asylum as a political pardon the pun, pawn.
Amendment VIII
[Excessive bail, fines and punishments prohibited.]
...nor cruel and unusual punishment.

"Just because a right is written into the constitution doesn't
mean that the rights given to the people are less important."
Amendment IX
[Reserved rights of people.]
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Section 1 in particular should be the trick in the hat, par se.
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
[Citizenship defined; privileges of citizens.]

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state
wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;
nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

This section should also be carefully considered.
Section 4.
[Public debt not to be questioned; payment of debts and claims incurred
in aid of rebellion forbidden.]

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law,
including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for
services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be
unqestioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or
pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion
against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of
any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held
illegal and void.

Article I.
Section 8.
[Taxes, duties, imposts, and excises.-1.]
....for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but
all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United
States.

I believe given the state of the world this issue of "where a citizen can
go" need to be more defined in terms of immigration policy. Also
immigration court coupled with civil and criminal liabilities in essence
a personal declaration of independence from the mother country.
Ironically, America's Declaration of Independence states as on the
reasons for the people's succession as "For transporting us beyond Seas
to be tried for pretended offenses." Truly Fischer's plight opens up a
can of worms.

Remember filmmaker French citizen Roman Polanski was never extradited to
for a more serious crime of...rape (1970)! Perhaps-other former statesmen
been granted citizenship Fischer does have a valid reason for his
renunciation...the events unfolding within the borders of the United
States look anything at best grim. Reason number one: The population has
been dumbed down and exploited by the media that the current
administration is the so-called good guy. Not! If the reader of this
article is paying attention to current events one will notice G.W. Bush's
continual creation of "Departments"...hmm, did not Adolph Hitler
restructure the German government with Minister of this and that. Also,
Albert Einstein, et al fleeing the holocaust. Truly, if you were in
Fischer's shoes given his sentiments and comments you would be quaking in
your shoes too!


Now for some Fischer optimism.
Let us not forget Fischer's latest passion Fischer Random Chess (FRC) or
Chess 960!As Wolfgang A. Mozart "was the greatest living musician ever to
walk the face of the Earth" Bobby Fischer in the eyes of most chess
aficionados is worthy of comparison as the greatest chess player ever to
walk the face of the earth although silently and eccentrically. There's
an old parable 'silence is golden', I believe Fischer's is the epitome
of these words. Take note Mozart was a closet eccentric via his
coprolalia which most astute scholars will agree. Fischer on the other
hand is more vocal and very unpredictable but he's no threat to the
United States of America.
First, take Fischer Random Chess (FRC) an embellishment of an older
variation. Classicall chess is played with the symmetry of King op/sur e1
(204 pos.) move 518. If the reader of this article takes a look at the
960 random setups in FRC one cannot comprehend the infiniteness of FRC;
this was Fischer's final frontier. Keep in mind move 518 and its MCO
theory is virtually nil in FRC. Another analogy would be the world
strongest man lifting the same weight repeatedly, whereas FRC offers the
player the ability to expand his or her horizons, par se. Play Blitz
FRC's and you will see what I mean. Let us not forget the value of
Fischer's ideas and the ramifications should Fischer want to further the
progress of FRC. The key words look foreword! Take a look at this .pdf
and look through the sheet til you get to move 518.
http://www.xs4all.be/~marcsmet/ebbs/...FRC_960Pos.pdf
Those of you that have looked at the FRC configurations will find that
move 518 becomes rather trite and meager in comparison to the 959
configurations. Some GM are more bold to say that the symmetry of chess
is ruined. On the contrary move 518 is not used in FRC. In other words,
once the chess player looks at the FRC configurations one will look at
move 518 in a different light. Fischer would encourage all chess players'
novices too and have a play at Fischer Random Chess.
So back to Fischer's plight.
The case of Bobby Fischer represents one of eccentric refugee without a
country yet he's brash and still brilliant (I wonder in awe about
Fischer's FRC ideas). Fischer represents the common man who has given up
on the corruption and decay of the Western society. Nevertheless, at the
same time his persecution should be looked at in terms of an immigration
issue regarding American citizenship emancipation. Finally, in light of
the Patriot Act time is ticking before all US citizens will chipped and
carded Nationally. Deep down inside...perhaps Fischer's realization to
reality.

Yep. The nuts have arrived in full force. You can tell by the gentle breeze
caused by the anonymous remailings. Where do these idiots come from?? You
would think that people who know how to play chess would have more
intelligence.

Ken Albin


"Italy Anonymous Remailer" wrote in message
...
I'd rather be a nut than having
an nntp posted to alt.fan.cock-sucking
dated 1997 by Ken Albin
ya faggot!!

(c) Please exuse the grammar errors I'm in a hurry.
The Emancipation of an Bobby Fischer et al.


OK, I'll excuse the logical, factual and spelling errors too, while I'm at it.
Come to think of it, with all that, the post isn't worth diddly. But at least,
we've excused you for it.