Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 23rd 07, 02:58 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.computer,rec.games.chess.analysis,alt.chess
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 197
Default Brian P. Lafferty lacks honesty according to Steve Owens

And, of course, our fine legal mind chooses to ignore the fact that
Mr. Terrie provided plenty of basis for his opinion... That fine legal
mind stated this:

Brian Lafferty wrote:
Without a stated, factual basis the opinion is just a personal
attack.

And that fine legal mind tossed out the below basis:

Hal Terrie wrote:
tanstaafl wrote:
I think Brian Lafferty needs to demonstrate that he can FOLLOW rules
before we accept him as a volunteer ENFORCING the rules, but that's
just my opinion. YMMV

My opinion as well. The old expression about letting the fox into the
henhouse comes to mind ...

-- Hal Terrie


Hal Terrie wrote:

In my opinion, Mr. Lafferty lacks even the slightest trustworthiness.
I believe the evidence shows that he came into this forum with a chip
on his shoulder, determined to make trouble from the very first day.
He whined and complained - and then threatened - until Bill Hall and
Bill Goichberg folded up like cheap suits. Now we have a massive
moderation bureaucracy but no guarantee that our esteemed USCF
Officers won't change the rules again at the slightest hint of
controversy.

-- Hal Terrie

Steve Owens

  #2   Report Post  
Old July 24th 07, 01:38 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.computer,rec.games.chess.analysis,alt.chess
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 197
Default Brian P. Lafferty lacks honesty according to Steve Owens

On 23 Jul, 09:58, Jackass Lafferty wrote:
And, of course, our fine legal mind chooses to ignore the fact that
Mr. Terrie provided plenty of basis for his opinion... That fine legal
mind stated this:

Brian Lafferty wrote:

Without a stated, factual basis the opinion is just a personal
attack.

And that fine legal mind tossed out the below basis:

Hal Terrie wrote:
tanstaafl wrote:

I think Brian Lafferty needs to demonstrate that he can FOLLOW rules
before we accept him as a volunteer ENFORCING the rules, but that's
just my opinion. YMMV

My opinion as well. The old expression about letting the fox into the
henhouse comes to mind ...

-- Hal Terrie

Hal Terrie wrote:

In my opinion, Mr. Lafferty lacks even the slightest trustworthiness.
I believe the evidence shows that he came into this forum with a chip
on his shoulder, determined to make trouble from the very first day.
He whined and complained - and then threatened - until Bill Hall and
Bill Goichberg folded up like cheap suits. Now we have a massive
moderation bureaucracy but no guarantee that our esteemed USCF
Officers won't change the rules again at the slightest hint of
controversy.

-- Hal Terrie

Steve Owens


Does Steve Owens have a case? Is Lafferty really dishonest?

Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brian P. Lafferty lacks trustworthiness according to Hal Terrie Jackass Lafferty rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) 1 July 24th 07 01:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Chess"

 

Copyright © 2017