Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 23rd 07, 06:07 AM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.computer,rec.games.chess.analysis,alt.chess
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: Apr 2006
Posts: 444
Default Nolan challenges Brian P Lafferty's trustworthiness

The problem is, Brian, that moderators in addition to doing things
like moving posts into or out of the review area and closing threads
also have the ability to edit or delete posts WITHOUT LEAVING ANY
EVIDENCE OF WHAT WAS DONE OR BY WHOM.

For that reason, we have to be VERY selective in appointing
moderators, far more than in appointing members of the FOC. It takes
someone with a blend of technical skills and adequate time to work on
the task, plus a huge degree of trustworthiness.

Nolan

Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nolan challenges Brian P Lafferty's trustworthiness samsloan rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) 0 July 23rd 07 06:07 AM
Brian P Lafferty's credibility is being challenged samsloan rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) 0 July 23rd 07 06:02 AM
Brian P Lafferty's credibility is being challenged samsloan rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) 0 July 23rd 07 06:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Chess"

 

Copyright © 2017