Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 29th 10, 11:53 AM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,misc.legal,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess,rec.games.chess.computer
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: May 2006
Posts: 14,870
Default Brian Lafferty asks for Amnesty on the USCF Issues Forum

I absolutely agree that there should be an amnesty. We have an
election campaign going on here, but the history of moderation of the
USCF Issues Forum has been that the moderators will not allow postings
favoring candidates they oppose or opposing candidates they favor.

For example, right now oldtimer, who favors Sam Sloan, is suspended
from posting.

How can the voting membership properly evaluate the candidates, if
they do not know what is being said about them?

Why is John Hillary allowed to attack Sam Sloan endlessly without
being sanctioned?

Let us remember that it was excessive moderation of this forum that
caused Polgar and Truong to be elected in the first place. When Polgar
and Truong were running for election, all of the moderators were pro-
Polgar and Truong and anti-Sam Sloan. Something like one thousand
postings, almost all of them anti-Polgar and Truong or pro-Sam Sloan,
were pulled by the moderators. Those of us who knew the true
background and history of Polgar and Truong and were trying to inform
the voting members of what we knew about them were prevented from
doing so.

Had the members of this forum been allowed to ask questions and make
negative observations about Polgar and Truong, almost without doubt
Truong would not have been elected. The person who would have been
elected was Stephen Jones, who was probably the best qualified person
ever to run for the USCF Executive Board. (Jones is a lawyer, a Ph.D.
in mathematics, a rated chess master and a life member of the USCF.)

Now, because of excessive moderation, instead of getting a qualified
person like Jones, we got Truong.

Are we going to go down that road again, with moderators who are using
their positions to get candidates they favor elected?

And are they going to sanction me for making this post?

Sam Sloan
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Major Victory for USCF in Illinois MrVidmar rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 22 July 16th 09 07:18 AM
The End Draws Near Mr.Vidmar[_2_] rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 0 March 25th 09 01:10 AM
Text of Complaint in USCF v. Polgar, Springfield IL, Case No.2008MR000751 samsloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 1 December 31st 08 10:03 AM
Text of Complaint in USCF v. Polgar, Springfield IL, Case No.2008MR000751 samsloan alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) 1 December 31st 08 10:03 AM
USCF Issues Forum: "New York Times" [email protected] rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 0 February 10th 07 06:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Chess"

 

Copyright © 2017