LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old November 30th 16, 12:49 PM posted to
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Default Playing higher rated opponents

Hash: SHA512

In article
The Horny Goat wrote:

On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 05:36:54 -0800 (PST), Eliyahu

On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 8:34:23 PM UTC+3, azigni wrote:
On Fri, 07 Oct 2016 03:52:05 +0200, Radrook wrote:
I think it is very unwise to play higher rated opponents.

I would like to all depends on ones reasons for playing chess.
Not every chess player aspires to be be a world class player. Not every
chess player wishes to play someone who could beat them.


What I want, what every normal chess player wants, is WINNING!!

In order to achieve that goal, you can start learning very hard, read a lot of books, play higher rated players, and get your a.. kicked.

I prefer the shortcut, playing weaker players, and winning without effort.

But to each his own. Those who like to lose because they wanna get better in order to win, also have their place. If everybody did like me, I wouldn't have opponents anymore.

My daughter played for awhile but gave it up as I let her win
occasionally to keep up her spirit but she was good enough to know
when the punches were being pulled. This would have been roughly 1750
vs 1100. I tried to get into the rudiments of analysis but she figured
it was going to take far too long to get the broad points down.

Which given the size of my library (which I haven't put nearly enough
time to master so it's at least as much a collection as a compilation
of assimilated chess knowledge) that's a real shame since it's big
enough and of high enough quality that a properrly motivated junior
could easily make master strength with enough time.

Moral: mastery at chess is one heckuva lot more than an ability to
appreciate quality in chess books and buy them!

This has, unfortunately, been my experience as well. Oh, and
sleeping with a chess book under the pillow did NOT help.

Eugene Delmar's Ghost

Version: N/A

DVDrG8B/QuyCtUaf2VQfZg+5UFRs1dCHQXWIonigwdEvGct4r9fKdWlr6N NGiIio
ijeiyCci5ElILBKKvAEDjcP3mAgsvOgMoub6Al0AngMpTgrCUr v9nEeSuujFNa0p
COo8oHibfl42L89vEntb5OHU3vy0xDTenogYDQHIs3tUswr2Mc CIIGer2G6CpzRd

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My highest Elo scalp on Playchess for far: beat a player rated 516points higher than me. raylopez99 (Chess General) 8 August 18th 10 10:17 PM
First Draft: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess samsloan (Chess General) 9 February 29th 08 03:55 PM
Should the USCF rate the Olympiads? Sam Sloan (Chess Politics) 9 March 29th 06 11:52 PM
Should the USCF rate the Olympiads? Sam Sloan (Chess General) 9 March 29th 06 11:52 PM
Why is a woman rated 1663 playing for the US title? Ray Gordon (Chess Politics) 1 March 10th 06 02:31 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.

About Us

"It's about Chess"


Copyright © 2017