LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 7th 04, 04:18 AM
Jane Adams
Posts: n/a
Default Trade secrets

Regarding the contract for the move to Crossville:

Why on earth would we wish to let the competition (ACA, etc) know the kind
of deal we got in Crossville? Or, for that matter, the process of getting

Am I the only person here that sees why such contractual arrangements are
never revealed except on a need to know basis. Well, I suppose Spammy could
leak them too, and that would be just as bad as what he did to USCL. (He
lied and lied about it).

It seems to me to be common sense not to show the competition how to do
anything. Let them figure it out on their own, and keep the organizational
experiences and reasons for doing things as trade secrets, which they
clearly are.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fritz 7 Trade Carol McAnulty (Computer Chess) 0 November 27th 04 02:41 PM
Neohumanist Perspectives on World Peace and Trade for Regional Self-Reliance oS2jSB Neohumanist Perspectives on World Peace and Trade (Chess Politics) 0 September 5th 04 12:05 PM
Trade for Convektas French training program? Aramaic (Computer Chess) 7 January 21st 04 10:21 AM
CEA Kathryn Rose Taylor (Chess Politics) 52 November 14th 03 01:40 AM
Secrets of the Russian Chess Masters Vol. 2 Bob Garrison (Chess General) 2 November 10th 03 01:46 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.

About Us

"It's about Chess"


Copyright © 2017