Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 29th 07, 10:57 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: Sep 2007
Posts: 383
Default Expert Will Confirm Mottershead Report In Writing by 12/10/07

The expert's written report will confirm the Mottershead Report's
methodology and findings linking Paul Truong to the FSS. This expert is
also willing to be video deposed, if necessary, under oath.

Now EB, what ya gonna do?


  #2   Report Post  
Old November 30th 07, 12:21 AM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: May 2006
Posts: 14,870
Default Expert Will Confirm Mottershead Report In Writing by 12/10/07

On Nov 29, 5:57 pm, "B. Lafferty" wrote:
The expert's written report will confirm the Mottershead Report's
methodology and findings linking Paul Truong to the FSS. This expert is
also willing to be video deposed, if necessary, under oath.

Now EB, what ya gonna do?


Is this your expert, or the USCF's official expert?

Sam Sloan
  #3   Report Post  
Old December 1st 07, 03:46 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,073
Default Expert Will Confirm Mottershead Report In Writing by 12/10/07

On Nov 29, 5:57 pm, "B. Lafferty" wrote:
The expert's written report will confirm the Mottershead Report's
methodology and findings linking Paul Truong to the FSS. This expert is
also willing to be video deposed, if necessary, under oath.

Now EB, what ya gonna do?


How do you come by this information? Is it your expert, or the USCF's?
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 2nd 07, 04:52 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,576
Default Expert Will Confirm Mottershead Report In Writing by 12/10/07

On Dec 1, 9:46 am, The Historian wrote:
On Nov 29, 5:57 pm, "B. Lafferty" wrote:

The expert's written report will confirm the Mottershead Report's
methodology and findings linking Paul Truong to the FSS. This expert is
also willing to be video deposed, if necessary, under oath.


Now EB, what ya gonna do?


How do you come by this information? Is it your expert, or the USCF's?


In the Senate of Rome, they the Roman Senators would debate the number
of teeth on a horse.
That was recently after the emperor appointed a horse to the Roman
Senate. It is self
Evident to any expert in the field that the report is true. What we
have is a dip ****
historian!

What you are doing, is Mr. Historian, acting like a cover man as was
done by the Roswell
Alien crash, in 1947. According to the FIDE President, the cover-up
exists. In exact
Same fashion, you attack the evidence, because you want to see Paul
Troung
Threaten to kill whoever he wants.


Marcus Roberts
  #5   Report Post  
Old December 3rd 07, 05:20 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: May 2006
Posts: 14,870
Default Expert Will Confirm Mottershead Report In Writing by 12/10/07

I believe that the option to opt out of third party mailings should
not apply to candidate or election mailings.

Many USCF members do not want to receive junk mail. That is what they
are saying when they opt out.

I would like to see a single example of a USCF member who does not
want to see literature from the candidates when they run for USCF
election.

Sam Sloan


  #6   Report Post  
Old December 3rd 07, 06:39 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: May 2006
Posts: 14,870
Default Expert Will Confirm Mottershead Report In Writing by 12/10/07

Quote:
Originally Posted by marknibb
Sam, I thought someone else just posted recently
that the two most recent rewrites of this type of law (California and
Iowa) have now protected personal information from being on this type
of list if requested. Perhaps many states laws are now out of date
with respect to privacy and concern over identity theft. I know that
in the last 5 years, a great deal of corporate law has changed
regarding personal right to privacy and what can and should be
protected by corporations.

Mark Nibbelin
I doubt that any state will change the laws so as to make it
impossible for a dissident group in an election campaign to contact
the voters.

Remember that the officers of the USCF get to see and use the mailing
addresses of the members.

Why should not the election opponents be allowed to contact those same
members?

Sam Sloan
  #7   Report Post  
Old December 3rd 07, 07:16 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: May 2006
Posts: 385
Default Expert Will Confirm Mottershead Report In Writing by 12/10/07

On Dec 3, 12:20 pm, samsloan wrote:
I believe that the option to opt out of third party mailings should
not apply to candidate or election mailings.

Many USCF members do not want to receive junk mail. That is what they
are saying when they opt out.

I would like to see a single example of a USCF member who does not
want to see literature from the candidates when they run for USCF
election.

Sam Sloan


OK.

Larry Tapper
USCF member since 1962
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How the Mottershead Report became public samsloan rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) 6 October 29th 07 10:18 PM
How the Mottershead Report became public samsloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 6 October 29th 07 10:18 PM
Mottershead Report Download samsloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 3 October 15th 07 10:43 PM
Mottershead Report Download samsloan alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) 3 October 15th 07 10:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Chess"

 

Copyright © 2017