LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 3rd 03, 06:17 AM
Posts: n/a
Default Chessmaster 2000 for DOS - Playing Strength?

Hi EZoto,

Be assured, there is nothing 'wrong' with CM 3000!

De initial versions of CM were definititely fun to play with and would still
be suitable for the occasional player.

It's just that with CM 4000 there was a sentational improvement in playing
strength. Bedore that, CM had never really been taken seriously as compared
to the Big Guys like Rebel, Chess Genius and Fritz.

"EZoto" schreef in bericht
news:[email protected]

I wouldn't bother with any versions before CM 4000.

I would like to know what is wrong with CM 3000. I'm not defending it
or anything but I have it on a computer with Win 3.1 and it works very
well and it plays pretty strong. I collect Win 3.1 software so I
don't know much about CM 3000. Just would like to know why.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IS IT WRONG TO PLAY VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES? Gunny Bunny (Computer Chess) 5 June 2nd 04 08:44 PM
Playing Strength Seeker3333361465 (Computer Chess) 9 February 2nd 04 08:20 AM
Chessmaster 9000 + Windoze 2000 Dr. David Kirkby (Computer Chess) 5 January 15th 04 11:57 AM
Chessmaster 9000 and Win 2000 Pro ? [email protected] (Computer Chess) 5 August 25th 03 01:20 PM
Chessmaster 2000 for DOS - Playing Strength? Proboscis (Computer Chess) 0 July 3rd 03 06:17 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.

About Us

"It's about Chess"


Copyright © 2017