Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 03, 06:25 PM
Don Mihokovich
 
Posts: n/a
Default All Three

Anybody out there go 3 for 3 and vote for all three winning candidates?

KidDon
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 30th 03, 02:00 AM
drahmiel
 
Posts: n/a
Default All Three

I was 0 for 3
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 30th 03, 01:10 PM
StanB
 
Posts: n/a
Default All Three


"drahmiel" wrote in message
...

I was 0 for 3


That is right. You said that:

1) Saddam didn't have the billion needed for medicine and medical help for
Iraq's children

2) The war would last for years

3) And, terrorism would continue in Israel even without Saddam funding it.

StanB


  #4   Report Post  
Old July 30th 03, 07:26 PM
drahmiel
 
Posts: n/a
Default All Three



That is right. You said that:

1) Saddam didn't have the billion needed for medicine and medical help for
Iraq's children

2) The war would last for years

3) And, terrorism would continue in Israel even without Saddam funding it.

StanB



Did somebody put ammonia in your crack pipe this morning??
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Chess"

 

Copyright © 2017