Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 13th 09, 02:55 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
Rob Rob is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,053
Default Run For the USCF Board= Get Sued

What sane person you want to be on this board? Anyone who serves gets
sued and has to defen themselves from lawsuits by nortorious gadflies.
Aside from a brief addition to a resume, it is worthless.Most people
could care less about the USCF so it's value on a resume is really nil.
  #2   Report Post  
Old March 13th 09, 05:47 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,073
Default Run For the USCF Board= Get Sued

On Mar 13, 10:55*am, Rob wrote:
What sane person you want to be on this board? Anyone who serves gets
sued and has to defen themselves from lawsuits by nortorious gadflies.
Aside from a brief addition to a resume, it is worthless.Most people
could care less about the USCF so it's value on a resume is really nil.


I think you're confusing gadflys with whiners and bald faced liars.
  #3   Report Post  
Old March 13th 09, 07:28 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 60
Default Run For the USCF Board= Get Sued



Rob wrote:
What sane person you want to be on this board? Anyone who serves gets
sued and has to defen themselves from lawsuits by nortorious gadflies.
Aside from a brief addition to a resume, it is worthless.Most people
could care less about the USCF so it's value on a resume is really nil.


Right. Most people never heard of the USCF. And people don't concern
themselves with chess organization for its resume value. They concern
themselves with chess organization because it means something to them.

David Ames
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Text of Complaint in USCF v. Polgar, Springfield IL, Case No.2008MR000751 samsloan rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) 1 December 31st 08 10:03 AM
Motion for Summary Judgment in Polgar vs. USCF samsloan rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) 0 October 5th 08 09:15 PM
Motion for Summary Judgment in Polgar vs. USCF samsloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 0 October 5th 08 09:15 PM
Should the USCF rate the Olympiads? Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 9 March 29th 06 11:52 PM
Reply to Affidavit of Leroy Dubeck Sam Sloan alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) 26 March 29th 05 04:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Chess"

 

Copyright © 2017