Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 16th 14, 10:54 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: May 2006
Posts: 14,870
Default Censorship as Usual on the USCF Issues Forum

The following posting was pulled from the USCF Issues Forum:

Subject: Election 2014

samsloan wrote:They have made it so difficult to stop me and any other non-approved candidates from running that now even the approved candidates have difficulty running. They almost did not have enough candidates to fill all the slots to run this time. We wait to see if they will pull any funny business like Bill Hall did at every election in the past. We want to see if the candidates really have enough signatures according to the rules. If they do not have enough will they try to change the rules retroactively? Will the election committee be consulted this time?
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The End Draws Near Mr.Vidmar[_2_] rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 0 March 25th 09 01:10 AM
The End Draws Near Mr.Vidmar[_2_] rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 0 March 25th 09 01:10 AM
The End Draws Near Mr.Vidmar[_2_] alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) 0 March 25th 09 01:10 AM
USCF Pension and Finance Problems and Slow Response From Board OdessaChess[_2_] rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 9 September 24th 07 11:59 PM
Should the USCF rate the Olympiads? Sam Sloan alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) 9 March 29th 06 11:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Chess"

 

Copyright © 2017